Go Back   IceInSpace > IceTrade Classifieds > IceTrade Archives

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-11-2013, 01:44 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,762
Explore Scientific 8x50 erecting finder

This finder is a beaut but made better by adding a Rigel pulse illuminator instead of those daggy things that seem to die after a week.
With the Rigel, this would set you back about A$225-250 landed. It can go for A$150 plus post.

Peter
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (FINDER.JPG)
79.1 KB121 views

Last edited by pmrid; 05-11-2013 at 02:21 PM.
  #2  
Old 05-11-2013, 01:48 PM
PostalRuhl's Avatar
PostalRuhl (Bryan)
Registered User

PostalRuhl is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 5
Is the finder corrected or still upside down like those other finders? And it is illuminated crosshairs, right?
  #3  
Old 05-11-2013, 02:20 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,762
G'day Bryan - it is corrected - i.e. "right way up ". I've added a pic showing that it also comes with a set of rings mounted on a pair of ADM vixen-saddles.
Peter
  #4  
Old 05-11-2013, 02:47 PM
PostalRuhl's Avatar
PostalRuhl (Bryan)
Registered User

PostalRuhl is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 5
Hmmm...Tempting. But I only have the standard finderscope bracket to hold a standard 8x50 finderscope. Does it have the same diameter and will it fit?
  #5  
Old 05-11-2013, 03:23 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,762
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostalRuhl View Post
Hmmm...Tempting. But I only have the standard finderscope bracket to hold a standard 8x50 finderscope. Does it have the same diameter and will it fit?
Yes. Diameter is the same.
P
  #6  
Old 05-11-2013, 04:28 PM
Astro_Bot's Avatar
Astro_Bot
Registered User

Astro_Bot is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,605
I'm interested in this myself, so checked specs and measurements.

The ES erect 8x50 finderscope has a tube diameter of 54.9mm, according to the Agena Astro product page: http://agenaastro.com/explore-scient...ed-finder.html

My SkyWatcher 9x50 finderscope (that comes with the standard bracket) has a tube diameter of 53.1mm according to my digital caliper.

Looking at the rubber ring and minimum internal diameter of the bracket, I have doubts that the ES finder would fit in the SkyWatcher bracket - I think it might be too tight a fit. But, maybe worth the chance anyway. I think I'll roll some dice, or toss a coin, to make up my mind.

Edit:
After deciding a coin toss was too risky, I pulled apart the SkyWatcher finder and measured the bracket internal diameter - there's a recess that the rubber ring sits in and behind that is the narrowest part of the bracket - the largest diameter of the narrowest part I could measure was 53.85mm, so it looks like it won't fit.

Last edited by Astro_Bot; 05-11-2013 at 04:37 PM. Reason: More measurements
  #7  
Old 05-11-2013, 05:02 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astro_Bot View Post
I'm interested in this myself, so checked specs and measurements.

The ES erect 8x50 finderscope has a tube diameter of 54.9mm, according to the Agena Astro product page: http://agenaastro.com/explore-scient...ed-finder.html

My SkyWatcher 9x50 finderscope (that comes with the standard bracket) has a tube diameter of 53.1mm according to my digital caliper.

Looking at the rubber ring and minimum internal diameter of the bracket, I have doubts that the ES finder would fit in the SkyWatcher bracket - I think it might be too tight a fit. But, maybe worth the chance anyway. I think I'll roll some dice, or toss a coin, to make up my mind.

Edit:
After deciding a coin toss was too risky, I pulled apart the SkyWatcher finder and measured the bracket internal diameter - there's a recess that the rubber ring sits in and behind that is the narrowest part of the bracket - the largest diameter of the narrowest part I could measure was 53.85mm, so it looks like it won't fit.
I'll have a look and see - but I'm pretty sure I have a WO finder bracket that would fit it. I'm not sure if I have a "foot " or shoe or whatever it is called to go with it though. Stay tuned.
Peter
  #8  
Old 05-11-2013, 05:14 PM
Astro_Bot's Avatar
Astro_Bot
Registered User

Astro_Bot is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,605
Thanks for that, but that'd have to be for Bryan since I'd be putting it on a small refractor where the "shoe" is part of the focusser, so no way to bolt on an alternative.
  #9  
Old 05-11-2013, 05:15 PM
PostalRuhl's Avatar
PostalRuhl (Bryan)
Registered User

PostalRuhl is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 5
I hope it fits mine but I am unsure. Let us know thx peter
  #10  
Old 05-11-2013, 05:37 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,762
Well, that's interesting.
I found 2 finder scope holders. The photos show them both. The " single-piece " one has 6 adjusting screws and is designed to be screwed into a newtonian OTA. It has 57mm at one end and 59mm at the other - so plenty of room for adjustment.

The other one is still a single cast piece but is designed to sit in a shoe - which I don't seem to have.

But it too has plenty of room for adjustment with openings of 61 mm - it is one of those with 2 screws and one spring-loaded point at each end. Not meant for guiding but fine as a finder.

SO you can actually nominate the holder of your choice.

Peter
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (solid.JPG)
189.2 KB37 views
Click for full-size image (split.JPG)
119.4 KB41 views
Click for full-size image (split2.JPG)
106.1 KB31 views
  #11  
Old 05-11-2013, 05:41 PM
Astro_Bot's Avatar
Astro_Bot
Registered User

Astro_Bot is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,605
The second "twin ringed" bracket looks like it has a Meade foot.
  #12  
Old 05-11-2013, 07:29 PM
PostalRuhl's Avatar
PostalRuhl (Bryan)
Registered User

PostalRuhl is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 5
The first finder bracket photo looks similar to the one I have, but the shoe looks different. Any chance thus might fit mine? Im going to use it with my orion ed100 and im sure youre familiar with the finder socket thats on it
  #13  
Old 05-11-2013, 07:37 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,762
Quote:
Originally Posted by PostalRuhl View Post
The first finder bracket photo looks similar to the one I have, but the shoe looks different. Any chance thus might fit mine? Im going to use it with my orion ed100 and im sure youre familiar with the finder socket thats on it
The first one is for a newt, not a refractor.
P.
  #14  
Old 05-11-2013, 08:53 PM
PostalRuhl's Avatar
PostalRuhl (Bryan)
Registered User

PostalRuhl is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 5
Hello peter, my bracket looks like this. Hows this one?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Screenshot_2013-11-05-20-52-10.jpg)
98.2 KB26 views
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement