Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 22-10-2005, 09:42 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambermile
Well, I've found that those scopes that do not use rings are usually pretty level wrt the dec axis - it's actually the use of rings that makes their adjustment necessary. Go figure!

Arthur

Now that does confuse me?
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 22-10-2005, 09:47 PM
Ambermile's Avatar
Ambermile
I make stuff...

Ambermile is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Norfolk, UK
Posts: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
Now that does confuse me?
Really? Most ring systems are cast or sintered and as such there is little about them that could be described as "precise". If your scope has a dovetail bolted directly on to it then it's usually a very good fit and so has been made to tighter tolerances and will sit parallel to the optical axis.

Arthur
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 22-10-2005, 09:53 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambermile
Really? Most ring systems are cast or sintered and as such there is little about them that could be described as "precise". If your scope has a dovetail bolted directly on to it then it's usually a very good fit and so has been made to tighter tolerances and will sit parallel to the optical axis.

Arthur

That makes sense!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 22-10-2005, 10:34 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
If you look at the first picture Dave you will see that I have replaced the original GM-8 mount head with a G-11 (longer bearing plate which should help with flexure and offer more support for the Dovetail plate). The original head (its a round "C" series mount plate) is the mount head on the left side of the dovetail on top. I then used a GM-8 "D" series head on the right.

It is probably overkill, but this setup allows me complete control over positioning of the scopes fore and aft and side to side for good balance. I'm gradually marking mounting plates and dovetail plates with the points of balance for the different imaging equipment setups I may be using at any time. So swaping them over and re-balancing is relatively easy.

Using Losmandy gear it goes without saying that its nice and stable but also that its not cheap. I managed to save a bit by getting the dovetail plates machined free through a friend and buying the additional plates from the US.

One disadvantage of doing it this way is its not light. This setup adds quite a few lbs to the system. If you were to buy the same system from Losmandy it would add an additional 7.25 lb to the mount. Then there is the weight of the additional dovetail plates, around 2 to 2.5 lb each. But boy is it solid You could swing a C-11 of this baby with a 4" refractor for a quide scope np at all. Assuming your mount could take it of course
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_2538.jpg)
34.4 KB44 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_2444.jpg)
26.9 KB37 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_2445.jpg)
48.6 KB39 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_2539.jpg)
37.1 KB34 views
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 22-10-2005, 11:33 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by [1ponders]
If you look at the first picture Dave you will see that I have replaced the original GM-8 mount head with a G-11 (longer bearing plate which should help with flexure and offer more support for the Dovetail plate). The original head (its a round "C" series mount plate) is the mount head on the left side of the dovetail on top. I then used a GM-8 "D" series head on the right.

It is probably overkill, but this setup allows me complete control over positioning of the scopes fore and aft and side to side for good balance. I'm gradually marking mounting plates and dovetail plates with the points of balance for the different imaging equipment setups I may be using at any time. So swaping them over and re-balancing is relatively easy.

Using Losmandy gear it goes without saying that its nice and stable but also that its not cheap. I managed to save a bit by getting the dovetail plates machined free through a friend and buying the additional plates from the US.

One disadvantage of doing it this way is its not light. This setup adds quite a few lbs to the system. If you were to buy the same system from Losmandy it would add an additional 7.25 lb to the mount. Then there is the weight of the additional dovetail plates, around 2 to 2.5 lb each. But boy is it solid You could swing a C-11 of this baby with a 4" refractor for a quide scope np at all. Assuming your mount could take it of course

I agree Paul that is a very solid setup. Hopefully I will get something together of a similar nature
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 23-10-2005, 09:06 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,378
Aurthur,

I just saw one of your earlier posts and that you have added the picture of the mount. thanks.

I can see how you can get the mount assemblies parallel now with those "grub" screws and lock it in with the main screw. looks a very solid setup!
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 23-10-2005, 09:51 AM
Ambermile's Avatar
Ambermile
I make stuff...

Ambermile is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Norfolk, UK
Posts: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
Aurthur,

I just saw one of your earlier posts and that you have added the picture of the mount. thanks.

I can see how you can get the mount assemblies parallel now with those "grub" screws and lock it in with the main screw. looks a very solid setup!
Oh. Right then. You won't want to see these then, will you
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (set-1.jpg)
34.1 KB71 views
Click for full-size image (set-2.jpg)
29.0 KB41 views
Click for full-size image (set-3.jpg)
38.0 KB57 views
Click for full-size image (set-4.jpg)
35.3 KB63 views
Click for full-size image (set-5.jpg)
68.9 KB53 views
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 23-10-2005, 11:12 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambermile
Oh. Right then. You won't want to see these then, will you
Arthur,
No total waste of time .

OMG thats awesome . Whats the blue bit hanging off the Meade N6????

I can see how you slide that bar to balance the Yaw of the system.

Nice pier, and construction details on that one???

now I notice that you have the Skyscan ,and not the synscan. how did you setup the computer link. Can you sync the camputer with the scope? Will that Sync the mount at the same time?

I am like a kid in a lollie shop, what to look at next.


Hey , hang on a minute is the Megrez II the guidescope? what have you got in it?
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 23-10-2005, 11:34 AM
rumples riot
Who knows

rumples riot is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackwood South Australia
Posts: 3,051
Ambermile that is a sweet looking setup you got there, whats your opinion of the EQ6. It looks to ge a nice mount and I think I will have to get one soon.

BTW, is that a bucket of plaster in the background, I am looking for some more ceiling fixers?
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 23-10-2005, 11:44 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by rumples riot
BTW, is that a bucket of plaster in the background, I am looking for some more ceiling fixers?

Paul
that's his other "light" bucket
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 23-10-2005, 05:02 PM
xrekcor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
1ponders,

How much weight can your Losmandy take or whats it's loading capacity.

Regards,CS
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 23-10-2005, 05:34 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
hi houghy,


the df30 or the k5 or uz8 was what i was thinking you could use on each of the three scopes or cameras to try and align whilst flat.

let me know any way and i can sample 3 off and send over
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Untitled-1.jpg)
83.4 KB44 views
Click for full-size image (Untitled-2.jpg)
75.0 KB21 views
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 23-10-2005, 05:37 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
nice setup arthur!!!
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 23-10-2005, 06:26 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Rob carrying capacity of the GM-8 is around 14 - 15 kg (30 lb), but I try not to carry more than about 10 kg (20 lb) if I'm using it for imaging.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 23-10-2005, 07:37 PM
Ambermile's Avatar
Ambermile
I make stuff...

Ambermile is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Norfolk, UK
Posts: 229
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
Arthur,OMG thats awesome . Whats the blue bit hanging off the Meade N6????
That "blue" bit is an Artemis, actually an ART-285AL, I'll have you know...
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
I can see how you slide that bar to balance the Yaw of the system.

Nice pier, and construction details on that one???
Simple - there's a 24" lump of 8"x4" square section cemented into the garden with a drilled and tapped (M20) flange on top. The little bit of the pier you can see is 8"x4" with a flange drilled on the bottom and a plate on top. This is bolted to the bit in the ground and the mount sits on another plate on top - adjusted for level by the four bolts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
now I notice that you have the Skyscan ,and not the synscan. how did you setup the computer link. Can you sync the camputer with the scope? Will that Sync the mount at the same time?
Oh yes, proper kit It is ver. 2.04 ISTR, just plug the two together really. Scope should be aligned first and then just put it into RS232 mode. Computer then can communicate and it's then just a case of telling the computer where the mount is pointing. On this syncing thing, I realised last night it's no big omission if you can get a list of the alignment stars. There's usually one near where you are pointing so you can do a quick one star align on the closest one to your target and away you go. Bit like the HPP but you have to do it manually.

Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
I am like a kid in a lollie shop, what to look at next.


Hey , hang on a minute is the Megrez II the guidescope? what have you got in it?
Umm, yup, that's one of the Megrez semi's in there. It has a QC Pro in the hole in the pics which I took out of the original case and fitted into an old 50mm camera lens case I had laying around.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rumple
BTW, is that a bucket of plaster in the background, I am looking for some more ceiling fixers?
Truth be told, I believe that is Dried Fish Blood and Bones for the roses Incidentally, that SN-6 is about to go off to somewhere as soon as I can find a buyer - looking at an SN-8 now...

Yes, I like the EQ6, it's soooo quiet after the coffee grinder LX200 and tracks real well. Not actually got any LX pics with it yet as every time I get set up something goes wrong. Last time it was a dead PSU (after I had converted all the leads to fit!).

Arthur

Last edited by Ambermile; 23-10-2005 at 07:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 23-10-2005, 10:43 PM
Ambermile's Avatar
Ambermile
I make stuff...

Ambermile is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Norfolk, UK
Posts: 229
Right, quick note here - I said I was "doing away" with the SN-6 so today I've taken it off the mount. Not too sure when the SN-8 will get here so I dug out an old friend

It is an Orion (UK) prototype f/5.6 158mm doublet refractor and I really do love it! Last year it was set up next to a 6" Starfire and stood up pretty well - losing out in contrast and also a bit of colour at higher mags but hey, you don't get an f/5.6 refractor to look at planets It really excels at DSO's and that's why I bought it.

Sadly, the prototype never made it to production (costs I suspect - although the doublet is Chinese it is not Synta and the focus assembly is cast in aluminium) so this is the only one around. It was purchased from a workshop sale at Orion a couple of years ago and I got it early last year. Even then I was a WO "disciple" so stripped it and repainted to match. Mesed up the gold though

Arthur
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (st-1.jpg)
58.3 KB38 views
Click for full-size image (st-2.jpg)
85.7 KB40 views
Click for full-size image (st-3.jpg)
76.2 KB42 views
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 24-10-2005, 12:07 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,378
looks impressive Arthur!
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 24-10-2005, 08:22 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidpretorius
hi houghy,


the df30 or the k5 or uz8 was what i was thinking you could use on each of the three scopes or cameras to try and align whilst flat.

let me know any way and i can sample 3 off and send over

Dave,

I have a circular one (not quite like the one shown) that I use on the tripod, its not attached, there is no where to put it. I have the older mount, and there is nowhere to put it. I did think of the triangular brace but that doesn't mean the mounting flat is parallel to the earths surface! That really then brings up another topic, is the base machined level? That goes for all scopes I would think?
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 28-10-2005, 10:03 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,378
an example of the tracking PE of the scope

I took an image the other night to find out what the PE would be like on the scope. I am no expert but it looks good to me, very small
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMGP9444cropPE.JPG)
67.3 KB79 views
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 28-10-2005, 10:13 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy
I took an image the other night to find out what the PE would be like on the scope. I am no expert but it looks good to me, very small

That looks good to me, although again I'm no expert.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement