Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Talk
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 10-05-2009, 12:06 AM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
I have one of these scopes and it is frustrating to remove the lens. I checked my scope and the FL spec did not match the length of the tube I suspect the lens in mine was used to compensate for short tube to give better spec. Again another trap to get into buying cheaper scopes although wasn't really cheap. (me)

Apart from that I hate having to take out the lens all the time to use my laser colliminator.

Hence I am looking at another scope.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-05-2009, 12:33 AM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Quote:
Originally Posted by mswhin63 View Post

I suspect the lens in mine was used to compensate for short tube to give better spec.
Sort-of yes - the corrector lens (a 2x barlow usually) allows the physical tube length to be around half the optical focal length.

My understanding is that the design achieves two things:-

1. Shorter tube length, hence more compact as well as less material used (= less cost)

2. Allows the use of a spherical mirror - cheaper to produce?

Last edited by erick; 10-05-2009 at 10:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-05-2009, 09:30 AM
Shano592's Avatar
Shano592 (Shane)
#6363

Shano592 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Central Coast NSW
Posts: 1,267
Yeah, there is no way that my tube is 700mm. Actual length is 517mm, tip to tip. I reckon that it is about 350-355mm from primary to secondary, which with the barlow in the focuser (which was found easily enough), would give close to 1400mm, f/9 characteristics.

Now ... if I were to get an F/5 Bintel Parabolic primary ...theoretically, I should be able to modify this scope with minor minor adjustments, albeit halving any magnification in he process. I'm talking about adjusting the position of the secondary by a few mm, to accommodate for the new focal length.

This would then allow me to do away with the in-line barlow, and have a short-tube F/5 scope.

Any holes in my argument so far?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-05-2009, 12:04 PM
Glenhuon (Bill)
Registered User

Glenhuon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Geraldton, WA
Posts: 1,440
Sounds good so far, but apart from the fun of doing the mods (which is something I like too). In money terms it would probably be a better option to look around for a good s/h 150 F5 to replace the OTA.

Just checked the lengths on my 150 F5 newt, centre of focuser to mirror 500mm, overall tube length 675mm. Looks like the tube is too short to accomodate a parabolic 150 F5 mirror.

Bill

Last edited by Glenhuon; 10-05-2009 at 12:21 PM. Reason: Additional Info
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-05-2009, 09:40 AM
Shano592's Avatar
Shano592 (Shane)
#6363

Shano592 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Central Coast NSW
Posts: 1,267
Yeah, I thought that, almost as soon as I posted.

Bunnings should have some good stormwater pipe that i can spray black inside. When I get the chance, I may take the spider off the top, take it on a roadtrip ...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement