Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-11-2012, 10:38 PM
nobbygon's Avatar
nobbygon (Angus)
Registered User

nobbygon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 59
Baader or Astronomik UHC

Hi,

I've moved to Sydney where the light pollution is much worse than where I’ve imaged from before. Traveling to a dark site is out of the question so I’m going to have a go with filters to try to block out some background light. I’m shooting through a GSO RC8 and QHY9 mono. It will basically replace my L filter.

I want to use the filter for both nebulae and galaxies. I understand that shooting galaxies through a UHC filter will block out some light but will it be worth it in terms of the darker backgrounds? I was leaning towards the Baader as it seems to be a bit broader than the Astronomik and should lessen this effect.

Has anyone got experience with both of these filters? What can you recommend?

Also, are these filters UV/IR blocking? I saw that the Astronomik site said theirs wasn’t and would need a separate filter. Can’t find anything on the Baader though.

Cheers,
Gus.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-11-2012, 03:56 PM
Max Vondel's Avatar
Max Vondel (Peter)
Time Traveller

Max Vondel is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bairnsdale VIC
Posts: 437
The Astronomik is supposed to be the best. I have some of the Baader filters and am happy with those. A friend has the Astronomik filters and I couldn't notice much difference. But it wasn't a straight comparison so no firm conclusions. Used visually only and not for imaging. Ref the UHC and OIII only
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-11-2012, 06:20 PM
nobbygon's Avatar
nobbygon (Angus)
Registered User

nobbygon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 59
Thanks for the reply Peter.

From my latest research it looks like the UHC filters will be a no go. They are intended for visual use. I've been recommended the Astronomik CLS-CCD for what I am trying to do.
Has anyone got any experience with this filter or know of any good alternatives?

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-11-2012, 10:46 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
From my latest research it looks like the UHC filters will be a no go. They are intended for visual use.
No, the Astronomik UHC and Baader UHC-S can be used for photography. Both these filters pass Ha and OIII bands for single shot colour.

Quote:
I've been recommended the Astronomik CLS-CCD
This is a good filter also. The CLS has a wider bandwidth than the other two, primarily at the blue end of the spectrum.

Quote:
I’m shooting through a GSO RC8 and QHY9 mono.
In that case I'd be more inclined to go narrow band for nebula with Ha and OIII filters. Maybe SII and H beta also, then do some combination with them for RGB colour.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-12-2012, 11:37 AM
alocky's Avatar
alocky (Andrew lockwood)
PI popular people's front

alocky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: perth australia
Posts: 1,291
I'm using the CLS-CCD filter, it works quite well from a semi dark site (bortle 3 or so), but I've never bothered from suburban Perth. I'll give it a go sometime out of curiosity.
Regards,
Andrew.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement