Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-10-2012, 01:43 PM
lepton3's Avatar
lepton3 (Ivan)
Registered User

lepton3 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 670
Jupiter Oct 6 UT

I finished my run on SN2009ip at around 330am this morning, and couldn't resist a quick look at Jupiter, even though the jetstream was apparently raging at 140 kts!

The seeing was reasonably stable, but soft, as you'd expect. I could see the G and B channels were pretty smeared once I had processed the video. Still, the final image was better than I expected.

C11, TV 3x Barlow, DBK21AU618.AS, 1800 of 7200 frames stacked with AS!2

-Ivan
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (jup_0009-LRGB_2.png)
123.5 KB107 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-10-2012, 06:11 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
that is good Ivan - definitely worth the effort. regards ray
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2012, 06:35 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Nice one Ivan but a pity about that jet. In situations like this, reckon it pays to drop back to 2X with the C11 as it still gives a respectable sized image of Jupiter right now. Helps with the seeing too of course, & is my main point here.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2012, 08:12 PM
lepton3's Avatar
lepton3 (Ivan)
Registered User

lepton3 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz View Post
that is good Ivan - definitely worth the effort. regards ray
Thanks Ray.

Quote:
Originally Posted by asimov View Post
Nice one Ivan but a pity about that jet. In situations like this, reckon it pays to drop back to 2X with the C11 as it still gives a respectable sized image of Jupiter right now. Helps with the seeing too of course, & is my main point here.
Thanks Asimov, I did grab a video with a 2.5x Powermate, and while the stack seemed to be less noisy than the 3x ones, there was less detail visible. I think 2.5x was not sufficiently different from 3x in this case.

Anyhow, fwiw here is the 2.5x Powermate version. I think the conclusion is there's really no substitute for seeing.

-Ivan
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (jup_0006-RGB.png)
75.6 KB26 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-10-2012, 11:18 PM
Clayton's Avatar
Clayton
Rob

Clayton is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,201
Nice work Ivan
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-10-2012, 09:50 AM
Quark's Avatar
Quark (Trevor)
Registered User

Quark is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Broken Hill NSW Australia
Posts: 4,110
Still worth the effort Ivan.

Regards
Trevor
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-10-2012, 11:35 PM
lepton3's Avatar
lepton3 (Ivan)
Registered User

lepton3 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clayton View Post
Nice work Ivan
Thanks Rob.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quark View Post
Still worth the effort Ivan.

Regards
Trevor
For sure, Trevor.

-Ivan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement