Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-07-2012, 02:51 PM
rmuhlack's Avatar
rmuhlack (Richard)
Professional Nerd

rmuhlack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Strathalbyn, SA
Posts: 979
eq6 portable pier mount

anyone here use a skywatcher portable EQ6 pier mount ? (like this)

just wondering how it compares (particularly for AP) with the stock EQ6 tripod (with the tripod legs fully retracted)

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-07-2012, 06:23 PM
rmuhlack's Avatar
rmuhlack (Richard)
Professional Nerd

rmuhlack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Strathalbyn, SA
Posts: 979
anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2012, 07:57 PM
Clancy Lane's Avatar
Clancy Lane (Phil)
Registered User

Clancy Lane is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Taromeo Qld
Posts: 169
Hi Richard!

Used one of these portable piers in my home ro/ro shed for a while before converting it into a permanent pier.

I wanted to avoid the 'tripping over tripod leg in the dark' happenings but still had to contend with the 'legs' jutting out from the pier.

It was quite a stable setup even with my 12" newt on a NEQ6 when the adjustable lock down on each leg is used.

The big advantage was the ability to wheel the scope around whilst on the pier......very mobile, even with the 12".

Hope this info helps.

Regards,

Phil

PS... I still have the legs with the wheels and lock down if you can use them......no use to me anymore!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-07-2012, 09:00 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Yes, I'd be interested in hearing people's experience on benefits over normal tripod too, particularly for "backyard" setup/pulldown. Do you get noticeably better stability over the tripod?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2012, 09:55 PM
Clancy Lane's Avatar
Clancy Lane (Phil)
Registered User

Clancy Lane is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Taromeo Qld
Posts: 169
Rob,

For me the only advantage over a tripod was the mobility with the scope attached..still tripped over the legs during the night.

I think it would only be worthwhile if you had to wheel the scope out each night and then only if you had a smooth surface such as concrete.

Regards,

Phil
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2012, 10:28 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Thanks Clancy.
It makes you wonder about the benefits of a (potentially?) stiffer mount after the convenience considerations of setup and polar alignment are sorted....
It's not something that seems to get commented on too often, I guess because most people either use mobile tripods, or fixed piers, but rarely anything in between.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-07-2012, 12:19 AM
MattT's Avatar
MattT
Reflecting on Refracting

MattT is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,216
Richard, somewhere Dr Tim Wethrell, of Mt Stromolo's Oddie refractor restoration fame, has his 8" frac on a wooden pier ...I think, for the life of me I have no idea where it is on the net. Could be on cloudy nights or possibly the Istar link on my sig, where he compares his 140mm APO TEC to the 200mm APO TEC scopes he owns. Some one else may have a link??? I'll post it if I find it. Might be of some interest.
Found it but not exactly what I was looking for.http://platypusart.com/wetherell/
Matt

Last edited by MattT; 12-07-2012 at 08:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement