ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waxing Gibbous 80.2%
|
|

06-07-2012, 11:49 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
|
|
John Carter
Hi , I got the DVD called " John Carter " out the other night , you know the Disney new reliese ,  come on you all must be interested as to what its like ..?
Well its science sux .  , but apart from that its a really entertaining movie , with great EFX , cool monsters and aliens , I could not ask for more ,  .
I liked it .
Oh yea its a kids kind of movie .
Has anyone else seen it yet ?
Brian.
|

06-07-2012, 01:37 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
|
|
Cant say I have Brian, glad you enjoyed it mate.
Leon
|

06-07-2012, 03:59 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Carrum Downs Victoria
Posts: 13
|
|
We watched it last week on DVD. l was not sure what to expect but l was very surprised to view a really fun family movie.
As Brian said a kids kind of movie but lots of entertainment for all ages.
John
|

06-07-2012, 04:26 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ulverstone Tas
Posts: 733
|
|
I liked the dog thing , ZOOM !
David
|

06-07-2012, 04:38 PM
|
 |
Star-Fishing
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tuckurimba
Posts: 885
|
|
Saw it at the cinema months ago ... thoroughly enjoyed it ... thought they put it together pretty well, mixing the west with space .. ending was great too .. a twist I wasnt expecting.
|

06-07-2012, 04:52 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
|
|
 Yea couldnt that , strange ? doggy,? thinggy ? , zoom alright , I liked him as well . He was cool with a big heart .
What a mate to have .
Brian.
Quote:
Originally Posted by omegacrux
I liked the dog thing , ZOOM !
David
|
|

06-07-2012, 06:50 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
|
|
It was ok and effects were good but I wonder how many of the series will be made. Edgar rice Burroughs wrote a lot of books about Barsoom and John Carter was one of the characters.
As to the movie it was a little lacking in story depth but overall entertaining.
|

06-07-2012, 07:06 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
|
|
 The more the merryier , thats a Barsoom saying .  .
Brian.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese
It was ok and effects were good but I wonder how many of the series will be made. Edgar rice Burroughs wrote a lot of books about Barsoom and John Carter was one of the characters.
As to the movie it was a little lacking in story depth but overall entertaining.
|
|

06-07-2012, 07:13 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,217
|
|
The name of the "dog-thing" is Woola and in the Barsoom tongue is a 'callot' (martian dog). It is John Carter's loyal companion/pet after he saves it from being bludgeoned to death by a white ape - actually Woola rescues JC first and then he can't turn his back on the creature which went to rescue him in the first place. (This information comes from the books not the movie)
Wow - this is somewhat embarrassing but the ERB martian chronicles were the first books I read and re-read when I was 12 or 13 yo and really loved them. ERB is internationally famous for Tarzan but IMHO the martian stories are far superior. The irony is that so much of contemporary sci-fi is heavily derivative of ERB and the Martian stories. Tattoween and the whole sand cruiser battles in return of the jedi are essentially the flyers, planet and battles from the John Carter books. The 'speeder bikes' in Ewok land from ROJ are also straight out of JC. Jedi fighting with swords and super strong able to jump and dodge all over the place - or the fiesty head strong space princess who can fight, lead and be a love interest princess deja thoris - oops I meant Princes lea - all JC once again written in 1912. Suffice to say George Lucas is heavily indebted to the non-litigeous nature of ERB's estate,
For almost 3 decades Hollywood has been talking and trying to make a JC film and largely limited by the special effects. The big problem being how to make the 15 foot high four armed sword fighting green martians come to life (when shrunk are also known as 'Sand people' in lucas land). Both James Cameron and Ridley Scott had both expressed interest in trying to make a JC film over the decades. Sadly the film is regarded as a failure because while they recouped their money it didn't make a spectacular profit as the producers had hoped and hence it is unlikely there will be another one.
Last edited by Profiler; 06-07-2012 at 07:32 PM.
|

06-07-2012, 07:40 PM
|
 |
It's about time
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,221
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Profiler
The irony is that so much of contemporary sci-fi is heavily derivative of ERB and the Martian stories.
|
Yes, we need to remember this and that the story was written 100 years ago. I kept that in mind as I watched it was was just happy to watch the story unfold, simple as it might have seemed. I thought they did a good job getting Mars looking as we know it is today - dry, dusty with a pink sky. I had tried to find the books about 20 years ago but no luck so I was curious to see the movie and find out about the story that had inspired so much!
|

06-07-2012, 08:34 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ulverstone Tas
Posts: 733
|
|
Hey Profile
What's the name of those books ?
They usually read better than movies ( Battlefield Earth )
David
|

06-07-2012, 09:03 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,217
|
|
As is always the case the books are far better than the movie and I can certainly recommend them.
The first three are the best (I think ERB wrote 6 Martian books before he died) and none of the books are particularly long. The first 3 relate to John Carter and thereafter the subsequent books are about other characters/hero's etc but not from earth and thus not super strong like JC.
From memory the first three books are:
A Princess of Mars
Gods of Mars
Warlord of Mars
Ironically, I saw only yesterday that the first three books had been reprinted into a single paperback volume for $17 at my local Dymocks
Last edited by Profiler; 07-07-2012 at 06:41 PM.
|

06-07-2012, 09:06 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ulverstone Tas
Posts: 733
|
|
Cool thanks
David
|

06-07-2012, 11:52 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful SE Tassie
Posts: 4,734
|
|
Very cheap at Amazon for the lovely Kindle ...
John Carter of Mars, Books 1-6 for ... $0.99!!
Book 1 : A Princess of Mars
Book 2 : The Gods of Mars
Book 3 : The Warlord of Mars
Book 4 : Thuvia, Maid of Mars
Book 5 : The Chessmen of Mars
Book 6 : The Master Mind of Mars
http://www.amazon.com/John-Carter-AU...der_B008DIX4H2
|

07-07-2012, 01:00 AM
|
 |
Senior Citizen
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bribie Island
Posts: 5,068
|
|
Zoom Zoom ..... 
Flash ... !! 
|

07-07-2012, 05:45 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful SE Tassie
Posts: 4,734
|
|
|

07-07-2012, 09:03 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,217
|
|
Although very cute and a nice touch the speed factor of the callot (i.e.Woola), if memory serves me correctly, is purely an invention of the movie. In the actual ERB martian books the creature description of callots is essentially correct as a somewhat 'frog' like looking creature with multiple legs but it features a huge head and mouth full of teeth. So the general concept of Woola was an alien bull-dog.
|

07-07-2012, 05:02 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tassie
Posts: 1,105
|
|
I got it for my kids and warned them that it may not be that great given it was supposedly a bit of a financial failure, but we were pleasantly surprised when we sat down and watched it - a decent family movie I thought
|

07-07-2012, 05:12 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,217
|
|
It is not a bad movie at all IMHO - the frustrating thing is that in movie producer world the ambition is to make a gigantic profit everytime - not a modest profit - off their ventures. They spent some 260 million making it and certainly didn't lose money but it wasn't an Avatar, Titanic, Up, Toy Story type return for them and hence in their mindset not a successful film. Ironically, the controversy about the movie was that many millions were spent on advertising which was not regarded as effective. Interestingly, in all the time it was showing in the cinema's all I could see of it in terms of ads was one bill-board on a highway and another at the Sydney IMAX. My fingers are crossed that they will one day make another.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:33 AM.
|
|