Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-06-2012, 10:41 AM
jasonh
Registered User

jasonh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 54
Is this lens dead?

Unfortunately I just sold this to a member here and after he cleaned the lens this was revealed

It does not look good at all and I suppose it is an example of a scope living inside an observatory.

I am giving a refund on the purchase but now wondering what I can do with this? I don't know exactly what the damage is, I guess it looks like the coating has been eaten away at multiple spots all over the objective.

Has anyone had any experience with this sort of thing? I am guessing that sending it back to Tak might be uneconomical.

Any ideas how much this has actually damaged the performance of the scope if I was to try and sell it at a reduced price?

Thanks,
Jason
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_1735.jpg)
149.5 KB173 views

Last edited by jasonh; 06-06-2012 at 10:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-06-2012, 11:32 AM
torana68's Avatar
torana68 (Roger)
Registered User

torana68 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ACT/NSW
Posts: 786
wow thats nasty, you could have it cleaned professionally but if its been like it for a while the coatings may have been eaten, someone here will recommend somewhere to have it cleaned then youll know if its cactus or not, dont leave it long like that. Value? thats a fair bit of the value right there but might be fixable.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2012, 11:48 AM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
You should be able to feel it if it is the coatings on the outside.
any chance of some higher resolution images from a lower angle?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-06-2012, 12:01 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
what did it look like before he cleaned it? what did he wipe it with? & yes a better shot will help

its had to tell but doesn't look like etching of the coatings to me - might be a reaction from some chemical with the coatings -hence what did he clean it with

pls tell me this isn't the Tak?

Last edited by dannat; 06-06-2012 at 12:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2012, 12:04 PM
jasonh
Registered User

jasonh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 54
I will ask him if he can, naturally he is absolved of the whole affair but hopefully he won't mind helping me out while it is with him.

Thanks,
Jason
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-06-2012, 12:06 PM
koputai's Avatar
koputai (Jason)
Registered User

koputai is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,648
What the hell did he clean it with? You may be taking a hit for a mistake someone else made.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-06-2012, 12:07 PM
jasonh
Registered User

jasonh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 54
It looked like lenses do when you know condensation had formed on them. It lived in an observatory, with the cap on when not in use but I had also trapped a spider in there that decided to **** on it a dozen times.

That seemed to come off OK. I did remove one spider doo to make sure there wasn't an issue there but for all my years in astronomy I had been told not to clean a lens unless it required it so I left it as it was and let the buyer do it if he wanted to.

In hindsight (of course!) I would have saved myself hundreds in shipping if I had decided to send it all cleaned up and found the problem first. Oh well...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-06-2012, 12:09 PM
jasonh
Registered User

jasonh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 54
Jason, I don't know what he cleaned it with but I would assume that if it was cleaned with something corrosive that it would have got rubbed all over the place rather than in spots.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-06-2012, 12:21 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
the coat ins is hard, it would have to have been applied at the factory incorrectly to be rubbed off - hence it looks like some type of liquid either sitting there (from drying) or a reaction of moisture/chemicals
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-06-2012, 12:24 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by koputai View Post
What the hell did he clean it with? You may be taking a hit for a mistake someone else made.
It was cleaned only in a few spots to remove spider **** and then only with warm water on a cotton wool pad in a few spot locations. No chemicals were used at all. Not everyone is a complete idiot.
Here is a crop from the centre of the objective.

Peter
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (crop.jpg)
73.6 KB113 views
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-06-2012, 12:32 PM
jasonh
Registered User

jasonh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 54
Yes, it was the Tak, It seems to have had a short life and I was privileged to pay about $500 per hour of use from it eek.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-06-2012, 12:49 PM
Miaplacidus's Avatar
Miaplacidus (Brian)
He used to cut the grass.

Miaplacidus is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hobart
Posts: 1,235
Can you email the photo to Tak directly. Their boffins might have some idea.

(If you told me that photo was of someone's cornea, then I would have suggested that the diagnosis was herpes keratitis.)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-06-2012, 01:20 PM
koputai's Avatar
koputai (Jason)
Registered User

koputai is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,648
Quote:
It was cleaned only in a few spots to remove spider **** and then only with warm water on a cotton wool pad in a few spot locations. No chemicals were used at all. Not everyone is a complete idiot.
Here is a crop from the centre of the objective.
Definitely looks like old damage doesn't it, and growth rather than just deposit. I hope it can be saved........
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-06-2012, 02:39 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miaplacidus View Post
Can you email the photo to Tak directly. Their boffins might have some idea.

(If you told me that photo was of someone's cornea, then I would have suggested that the diagnosis was herpes keratitis.)
You can get herpes in your eyes?!?

Those ones lower down in the cropped shot look like the coating has been eaten, but hard to tell from the photos.

I'd contact Takahashi and send them photos, they may have an idea to try re cleaning. I guess its possible that it could be sitting on top of the coatings, but I wouldn't be feeling super optimistic.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-06-2012, 05:40 PM
andyc's Avatar
andyc (Andy)
Registered User

andyc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,008
Would suggest perhaps something's grown on the lens from spores(?). Perhaps the addition of water was enough to activate them but not to remove the spores. Or possibly crystallisation from a solution around seed points? Those star shapes definitely look like either something living or something crystallised out of solution. But am really no expert at all - though I've seen 1cm lichens growing on an old uncleaned primary mirror that was left for a decade .

The more I look at it, the more it looks like crystallisation - maybe salts from the water, or produced by the mix of water and whatever was on the lens surface pre-cleaning?

I hope you can find a way to fix it!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-06-2012, 05:58 PM
jenchris's Avatar
jenchris (Jennifer)
Registered User

jenchris is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ormeau Gold Coast
Posts: 2,067
looks like pollen or spores - most of it will clean off with iso I reckon
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-06-2012, 05:59 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,750
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyc View Post
Would suggest perhaps something's grown on the lens from spores(?). Perhaps the addition of water was enough to activate them but not to remove the spores. Or possibly crystallisation from a solution around seed points? Those star shapes definitely look like either something living or something crystallised out of solution. But am really no expert at all - though I've seen 1cm lichens growing on an old uncleaned primary mirror that was left for a decade .

The more I look at it, the more it looks like crystallisation - maybe salts from the water, or produced by the mix of water and whatever was on the lens surface pre-cleaning?

I hope you can find a way to fix it!
the theory overlooks that the lens was not cleaned across it's whole surface. As I said, it was spot cleaned with water only in the few locations where spider poop was. The growth, whatever it is, is across the entire lens surface - edge to edge.

So whatever it is, it has been there for some time, it is related to some common cause, loks fungicidal and is uniform across the whole surface.
Peter
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-06-2012, 06:59 PM
mplanet62's Avatar
mplanet62 (Michael)
Registered User

mplanet62 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 86
If you did not see the actual spider - that's fungi growth. Looks like spiderweb, too. And it affects the optics profoundly - if left for too long. The only way to find how much damage was done is to clean the stuff off professionally - you don't want those spores all over your house, and primary cell assembly and collimation is a smart business in refractors. Considering the possible cost of all of this - not much resale value there might be. Sorry.
As a best case scenario, after you pay the cost of fixing it - you'll have a good scope back. Tak may be worth it.
P.S. It's not the first time I hear about this problem with Tak. Does it mean anything?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-06-2012, 07:19 PM
Hans Tucker (Hans)
Registered User

Hans Tucker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,476
I really wish I could find the thread on Astromart by Roland Christen (Astro-Physics) that covered a lens recovery that was in a similar, possibly worse condition, to this lens. I believed it used Acetone, Prurosol and human saliva.

Last edited by Hans Tucker; 06-06-2012 at 07:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-06-2012, 07:41 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
Talking of saliva, I know of 2 very exp bino users/cleaners that finish there bino cleaning with hot breath always with a eyeglass lens cloth, it removes all cleaning marks apparently
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement