Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12-03-2012, 04:55 PM
barx1963's Avatar
barx1963 (Malcolm)
Bright the hawk's flight

barx1963 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mt Duneed Vic
Posts: 3,982
Solar Max 60 Report

Solar Max 60 Report

I have had this new scope for a week now and have it out on several occasions, so time to give a bit of a report.

The specs of this scope are

Aperture 60mm
Focal Length 400mm
f/Ratio 6.6
Bandwidth 0.7A single stacked

I haven't weighed the scope so not sure about the weight but for a fairly small unit it is reasonably heavy. It has an adjustable clamshell which can move up and down the tube to allow balancing. There are three 1/4 inch threads og the base for attaching to mounts. The focuser has 2 parts. A simple sliding drawtube which is held in place by a couple of nylon screws for rough focusing and a solid helical focuser for fine tuning. This arrangement works well but if you have a heavy eyepiece in loosning the nylon screws may cause it to swing around. Eyepieces are held in place with another nylon screw not a compression ring so if it does swing around make sure it is tight!

The scope comes with a 25mm Cemax EP which apppears to be a simple Plossl. I found that there was a lot of ghosting of the image. I only use it now when setting up to amke sure the image is nicely centred before switching to a higher power Nag. In the 13mm Nag at 30x the view is really nice and steady even when seeing is a bit unsteady. This enable you to pick out any interesting features to examine further. I also used a 7mm Nag at 57x which is enough power to get good views of spots and prominences and see some real detail. I tried a 2x barlow which the 7mm also but without much luck.

Tuning is done with a lever on one side. Moving it to about 80% to the left allows a great view of prominences and about the same distance right makes spots and their surround stand out so well done Meade on producing a well tuned scope!

The Sol Ranger finder is easy to use. I setup initially by looking at the shodow of the scope on the ground to roughly line it up. On the back of the Sol Ranger a small white dot appears, centre this and the sun is in the centre of the FOV in the 25mm ep.

I have mounted this on a photo tripod which works OK and on my old EQ2 mount. The EQ I have done a rough Polar alignement with a compass only but if I am careful this is good enough to keep the sun in the FOV at 57x for over an hour with the motor running on the RA axis. The mount has no trouble handling the weight.

Overall I am very impressed. Good points are solid build, easy tuning, easy focusing, well thought out finder. Points that could be better are lack of compression ring on the eyepiece holder, supplied EP is just adequate, nylon screws are a bit dodgy. Have said that, there is nothing that would persuade me that this scope is not great value for money at $1900. Mind you if I was shelling out nearly $10k for a top of the line Solar Max, I would want these items addressed!

Malcolm
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_9365.jpg)
84.0 KB27 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_9366.jpg)
191.1 KB25 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_9367.jpg)
102.5 KB26 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_9368.jpg)
157.2 KB27 views

Last edited by barx1963; 12-03-2012 at 06:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2012, 06:21 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
nice report malcolm. What made you choose the solarmax over Lunt?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-2012, 06:34 PM
barx1963's Avatar
barx1963 (Malcolm)
Bright the hawk's flight

barx1963 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mt Duneed Vic
Posts: 3,982
Hi Mark
I wanted to keep price under $2k. The Lunt is available under that price but with only a 6mm blocking filter, and from what I had learned if I wanted to do some solar imaging you need at least a 10mm blocking filter.
Also the SM comes with a dedicated finder which the Lunt doesn't.
In addition I had looked through an SM a couple of times and been impressed, so it was partly a case of I knew what I would get.

Thats about it!

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-03-2012, 07:47 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
Thanks for the review, have you used a PST? I'd love to know how much of a step up this scope is from the PST.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-03-2012, 07:51 PM
barx1963's Avatar
barx1963 (Malcolm)
Bright the hawk's flight

barx1963 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mt Duneed Vic
Posts: 3,982
Hey Peter
No I haven't used a PST. I wanted to get something that would be available for imaging if I went down that path, and from reading the PST is a bit problematic in that regard.
Also the PST has a fairly small sweet spot I gather, while the SM has a nice even FOV.

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-03-2012, 08:05 PM
mozzie's Avatar
mozzie (Peter)
Registered User

mozzie is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: moonee beach
Posts: 2,179
nice report malcolm

looking at the sun is something iv'e come to enjoy!!!!!!!!
with your eyepiece i bought a hyperion zoom mark 3 and am happy with it's results zooming from 24 down to 8...5 eyepieces in one...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement