Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-02-2012, 09:50 PM
niko's Avatar
niko
Registered User

niko is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,053
Star trail - excessive noise - suggestions?

Hi,

I took this trail photo a few weeks ago and was surprised to see so much noise.

Could anyone offer any suggestions as to why?

Many thanks

niko

http://www.flickr.com/photos/6638216...in/photostream
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-02-2012, 10:04 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
Were you in jpg mode? was it a hot night?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-2012, 10:43 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Nick, there is software available for combining lots of short'ish exposure images into trails, I'm sure. That would keep your long exposure noise down signficantly.

Aha, found it - cunningly hidden on a webpage called "Startrails"!
http://www.startrails.de/html/software.html
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-02-2012, 09:41 AM
niko's Avatar
niko
Registered User

niko is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,053
Thanks guys.

Ah yes, it was a hot night. I did take a raw as well but the results are just as bad.

Really? A warm night can do that! Wow!

Thanks Rob - I have used startrails but find it creates quite a jagged/stepped trail and wanted to see if I could do better with a long exposure like I used to do with film.

cheers

niko
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-02-2012, 01:39 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
If it is a hot night, then consider some form of cooling, the sensor gets hot and noise becomes an issue.
Can you post a RAW image somewhere? What ISO were you shooting at, and how long was the exposure?
Are these the jagged trails you meant with the software?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/6638216...n/photostream/
The jaggies can be as a result of having VR/Image Stabilisation turned on, or the tripod being to lightweight.

As for the noise, I make sure the camera starts off rested and cool, and set it to ISO 200 and try a 10-15 minute exposure. Turn the camera off for 30 seconds to cool the sensor back down and then take another 10 minute one. Seems to work okay and be low noise.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-02-2012, 08:42 PM
niko's Avatar
niko
Registered User

niko is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,053
Thanks Peter - I'll check the stabilisation and perhaps weight the tripod down.

ISO was pretty low from memory - probably 100 and the exposure was probably close to 2 hours (maybe a bit long)

Would be delighted to post the RAW if you can suggest where.

thanks again

niko
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-02-2012, 12:09 AM
skysurfer's Avatar
skysurfer
Dark sky rules !

skysurfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: 33S 150E (AU holiday)
Posts: 1,181
Looks very grainy. Do you have exif info ? Looks like 6400 or more asa. A hot night cannot be the main problem I have taken many pictures in Bali at 27ºC with iso1600 and virtually no grain. But the exposure time was always short, no more than a few minutes. I don't have experience with *hours* of exposure time that might be the problem. Did you set the 'long exposure noise reduction' on ? In that case the camera will take another picture (darkframe) with the same (which means hours in your case) exposure time.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-02-2012, 09:20 AM
niko's Avatar
niko
Registered User

niko is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,053
termia kasih skysurfer! I'll check the exif info
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-02-2012, 11:00 AM
luigi
Registered User

luigi is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 438
If you plan to take a single shot then turn on long exposure noise reduction in your camera. The shot will take twice as long but the noise will be reduced.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-02-2012, 11:33 AM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Definitely noise caused by heat.
Give Star Trails another go. I too notice exaggerated jagged edges while viewing the image within the program. But in a full res image, they aren't as bad.
Try doing 5 minute subs instead, with 1 second between shots.
You can try to clean up this image though, using the "dust and scratches" filter in Photoshop. A very small increment is all that should be needed, then fade it back if necessary.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-02-2012, 12:07 PM
niko's Avatar
niko
Registered User

niko is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,053
thanks again for all the advice

we have clear skies (sorry to those in the north) but that giant bright thing in the night sky is a terrible interference!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-02-2012, 12:50 PM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by niko View Post
thanks again for all the advice

we have clear skies (sorry to those in the north) but that giant bright thing in the night sky is a terrible interference!
I know, someone needs to turn it off!!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-02-2012, 01:14 PM
niko's Avatar
niko
Registered User

niko is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,053
LOL!

Don't get me wrong I love the moon but perhaps if it could only ever get to about 65-70% full we could all be happy. The terminator would be there so we'd get nice views and the lunar month could be that little bit shorter.

Terry did such a good job with the comet - maybe his powers extend to objects a little closer....?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-02-2012, 01:27 PM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
I think that star trail pics is one area where film cameras still have the edge. The star trail software is good but not as simple as a single long exposure.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-02-2012, 02:18 PM
niko's Avatar
niko
Registered User

niko is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,053
I agree with you Terry - probably the single area where film stll holds the edge in astrophotography.

Also, so much easier to focus on infinity.

And for that reason I unearthed an old Minolta at my Mum's on the weekend (mine has mould in the lens) and bought some film from Ted's yesterday.

Look out for a whole host of postings when the film comes back from the chemists!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement