Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 23-10-2011, 12:45 AM
Jbunky86 (Jason)
Registered User

Jbunky86 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth
Posts: 85
Overloading CG5GT mount?

Hi everyone I currently have a C8 on a CG5GT mount and I was thinking of getting a carbon fiber ED80 To mount on top for visual and imaging using a cannon eos 1100d, which is a pretty light DSLR.
Can anyone tell me if this would be overloading the mount? I have done some weighing and rough calculations, including accessories and it looks like it would be at 70% of the mounts total capacity.

Has anyone done anything similar? Would I be over loading the mount? Because I'm still after accuracy after doing this. I would like to keep this mount because anything with higher capacity is getting pretty big and harder to transport.

Thanks jas
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-10-2011, 11:09 AM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
Hi Jas, I dont think the weight will be an issue , plenty of good astrophotos have been done using that set uo , but its the little extra weight thats further from the centre of ballence that makes it harder to acheive good results , hence ballence becomes very critical .
Good luck and hope to see a few photos soon
Brian.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-10-2011, 01:46 PM
Jbunky86 (Jason)
Registered User

Jbunky86 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth
Posts: 85
Hi thanks Brian, yes alot of the guys said the same thing on another forum. As in balance is critical and there was mention of going side by side would be better for keeping weight more central, even though side by side mount weighs more.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-10-2011, 09:30 AM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,895
From memory I had a C9.25 + 80mm Meg - quite heavy - and a Canon 400D on a CG5 - using 15kgs of counterweights.

That pushed it to its limits - but it managed it just (for astrophotograpy) doing under 5 mintue auto guided subs - on good (not windy days).

The more I read stories of mounts with problems - the more I love the Atlux I upgraded too. It carries the same gear + a 5" MAK, OAG, Losmandy bars, motor focusers etc.... This set up points in the low tens of arc seconds accuracy and tracks superbly. I find 30 minute subs at 2.3 metre focal lengths routinely easy - I'm blessed!

One day all my gear will likely end up on a paramount class mount - but the story for you is if you balance, shelter and set up your gear really well you'll likely be happy with it!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-10-2011, 12:13 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
What's an Atlux worth?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-10-2011, 01:28 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,895
Brand new around $7K - I bought second hand - saved nicely!

Plus I got the model with the SkySensor2000-PC and upgraded it to the latest EPROMS. Personally I think its far, far more capable than the Skybook version.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-10-2011, 04:36 PM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
In relation to over mounting its not just about balance.

as g-day said wind protection is a massive point but one of the biggest points is actually your mounts tuning eg backlash, meshing and the like utilizing a oag system will also push your mount further than without it.

My EQ6 is a testiment to this notion although i have got the over all weight down under 25kgs now I can run it with the 10" newt, ED 80, all cameras qhy9 mono, canon 40D, guiding and the like which is about 27kgs and still get round stars but i have adjusted and polished that white turd like you wouldn't believe!

So number one get your mount tuned and adjusted
number two, balance it well
number three, make sure its a still night
number four, enjoy your time

Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24-10-2011, 08:18 PM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
Jason I bieleve its best to have the balance so its a little towards the bottom , eg. the weight is falling down onto the RA drive as it climbs , that takes care of any back lash
Only a little ! mind .
Brian.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbunky86 View Post
Hi thanks Brian, yes alot of the guys said the same thing on another forum. As in balance is critical and there was mention of going side by side would be better for keeping weight more central, even though side by side mount weighs more.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-11-2011, 08:35 PM
Jbunky86 (Jason)
Registered User

Jbunky86 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth
Posts: 85
Good advice
Thanks guys
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-11-2011, 09:01 AM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
I think you should upgrade to a paramount right away!

(and then sell me your Atlux, cheap!)




Quote:
Originally Posted by g__day View Post
From memory I had a C9.25 + 80mm Meg - quite heavy - and a Canon 400D on a CG5 - using 15kgs of counterweights.

That pushed it to its limits - but it managed it just (for astrophotograpy) doing under 5 mintue auto guided subs - on good (not windy days).

The more I read stories of mounts with problems - the more I love the Atlux I upgraded too. It carries the same gear + a 5" MAK, OAG, Losmandy bars, motor focusers etc.... This set up points in the low tens of arc seconds accuracy and tracks superbly. I find 30 minute subs at 2.3 metre focal lengths routinely easy - I'm blessed!

One day all my gear will likely end up on a paramount class mount - but the story for you is if you balance, shelter and set up your gear really well you'll likely be happy with it!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement