Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-10-2011, 12:32 AM
Phil Hart's Avatar
Phil Hart
Registered User

Phil Hart is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mount Glasgow (central Vic)
Posts: 1,091
40 Orionid Meteors

hi all

Here's a page with my image of 40 Orionid Meteors from Saturday night (Sunday morning) and some words:
http://philhart.com/content/40-orion...d-october-2011

I have to find a way to make the processing easier!

Good luck to everbody at IISAC and VicSouth this weekend. Sorry I can't be there!

cheers
Phil
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-10-2011, 02:02 AM
luigi
Registered User

luigi is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 438
Standing ovation!!!

The image is fantastic, and I really appreciate the description of your process.

I tried with 30 second exposures but only got 2 meteors:
http://www.luisargerich.com/nightsca...4e68#h3a8f4e68


I have the theory that the fainter meteors can be washed by sky glow in the long exposures so maybe your 4 second exposures does the trick. What do you think?

Luis
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-10-2011, 02:20 AM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Phil,

That is a remarkable image. I am honestly floored.

Congralations, mate!

H
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-10-2011, 06:14 AM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
Excellent Work Phil, great result. With the one meteor I captured I did a similar thing to you in regards to masking and overlaying over another background image. I think this is the best method to use but as you state in your description it is tedious going through them all... I tried using a program called Starmax to auto detect the meteors but have been unsuccessful so far.

It shows a wide FOV fast lens and high ISO is what is needed for these to be captured on a DSLR. Thanks for taking the time for explaining how to capture them and process them out..

BTW did you have to do much curves adjustment on them to bring them out more?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-10-2011, 07:01 AM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
Terrific work Phil, I am prob only 50km from there & we were quite cloudy
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-10-2011, 07:05 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Brilliant image, Phil!
Stunning.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-10-2011, 07:41 AM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Excellent meteor capture Phil. Would have to be the best I have seen. Thanks for the view. All the best.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-10-2011, 08:11 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
A terrific image Phil. I like your planning and execution of a difficult imaging task. Tedious processing. I can't think of a way to speed it up unless scripting is able to be used. Perhaps another way would be to use the various combining methods in CCDstack. Setup right CCDstack combining methods will reject the meteors from the images.

Perhaps simply stack all the images and select out the meteors using Photoshop magic wand or a hide all mask or colour range selection seeing as they seem to be green.

The objects on the left are they trees? I'd be tempted to clone tool them out.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-10-2011, 08:54 AM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Amazing work Phil.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26-10-2011, 09:17 AM
Phil Hart's Avatar
Phil Hart
Registered User

Phil Hart is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mount Glasgow (central Vic)
Posts: 1,091
thanks all!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Astroman View Post
Excellent Work Phil, great result. With the one meteor I captured I did a similar thing to you in regards to masking and overlaying over another background image. I think this is the best method to use but as you state in your description it is tedious going through them all... I tried using a program called Starmax to auto detect the meteors but have been unsuccessful so far.

It shows a wide FOV fast lens and high ISO is what is needed for these to be captured on a DSLR. Thanks for taking the time for explaining how to capture them and process them out..

BTW did you have to do much curves adjustment on them to bring them out more?
Yes.. it does take some curves adjustment (brightening) of the meteor sub-frames to get them to stand out. which answers greg's points as well.. the fainter parts of the meteor trail blend away into the background so selecting with magic wand/colour range etc doesn't work.

the very short exposure helps keep the background brightness down (more difficult with a bit of moonlight too) but after the curves adjustment it still makes the background brighter than the base image so just using lighten mode doesn't work.

i think the next step is to try video mode, as the meteors will be recorded just as bright but the background exposure will only effectively be 1/30 sec. not sure how i would process it though!

Phil
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 26-10-2011, 10:37 AM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
That is just an amazing image, very nice indeed.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 26-10-2011, 11:51 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,693
Like many here I am sure, I have had the "heard about an amazing meteor shower on the radio, have you seen it" line a few times here at work and I have patiently tried to explain how it works. It was nice to be able to send your photo around work and say "see? this is what I was talking about" :-)

Great project Phil.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 26-10-2011, 03:37 PM
Osirisra's Avatar
Osirisra (Ken)
Dead God

Osirisra is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 635
That is awesome, well done on an epic job. Makes me happy to see this as all I've seen of the Orionids this year is cloud and rain
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 26-10-2011, 07:36 PM
midnight's Avatar
midnight (Darrin)
Always on the road

midnight is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Australind, WA
Posts: 891
Fantastic work Phil. A lot of effort has gone into that and it shows in the presentation.

Darrin..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 26-10-2011, 11:48 PM
astronobob's Avatar
astronobob (Bob)
Casual Cosmos Capturer

astronobob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Gold Coast SE QLD
Posts: 4,478
That is a stunning result, Has a lot of Impact, Yep, Amazing work ! !
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 27-10-2011, 12:02 AM
mishku
Registered User

mishku is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 491
Mindblowingly good!!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 27-10-2011, 12:51 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by philiphart View Post
thanks all!



Yes.. it does take some curves adjustment (brightening) of the meteor sub-frames to get them to stand out. which answers greg's points as well.. the fainter parts of the meteor trail blend away into the background so selecting with magic wand/colour range etc doesn't work.

the very short exposure helps keep the background brightness down (more difficult with a bit of moonlight too) but after the curves adjustment it still makes the background brighter than the base image so just using lighten mode doesn't work.

i think the next step is to try video mode, as the meteors will be recorded just as bright but the background exposure will only effectively be 1/30 sec. not sure how i would process it though!

Phil
What about simply stacking all the images and then using normal masking techniques to select out the meteors and enhance them with curves etc.

Non Orionid meteors could be clone tool or healing tooled out. Would that work?

That way you are simply doing a normal callibrate, normalise, data rejection for clean up then align and median stack routine then in PS to mask the meteors to boost them then healing tool unwanted ones out.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 27-10-2011, 08:53 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
An amazing photo Phil.

Thanks.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 27-10-2011, 09:14 PM
John Hothersall's Avatar
John Hothersall
Registered User

John Hothersall is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thornlands, Brisbane.
Posts: 1,346
Thats very impressive with great perspective.

John.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 27-10-2011, 09:30 PM
Phil Hart's Avatar
Phil Hart
Registered User

Phil Hart is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mount Glasgow (central Vic)
Posts: 1,091
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
What about simply stacking all the images and then using normal masking techniques to select out the meteors and enhance them with curves etc.

Non Orionid meteors could be clone tool or healing tooled out. Would that work?

That way you are simply doing a normal callibrate, normalise, data rejection for clean up then align and median stack routine then in PS to mask the meteors to boost them then healing tool unwanted ones out.

Greg.
the masking process isn't any easier whether you do it on each meteor frame or on a combination. but aligning and stacking 5000 frames takes a long time and leaves you with a million satellite trails across the image. so it's quicker to reject most of the frames first.

i have however another idea, similar to something i used on some of my comet mcnaught images. if i take the average of a few sub-frames and subtract it from all those with meteors, that should leave just the meteor better separated from the background. i'm working on a repro..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement