Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-09-2011, 01:28 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
47 Tuc

This image of 47 vTuc is a combine of 12 X 2 minute exposures and 12 X 30 second exposures for the core area. Looking at the background I could do with taking some 3 - 5 minute exposures to make the background star field jump out a bit more.

This was only a test after making some radical changes to the camera settings and getting everything well balanced in software. I need to do some more testing before I can reveal the changes made.

Details:
12 X 2 minute exposures each LRGB
12 X 30 second exposures each LRGB
Calibrated using CCDStack.


Hi Res Version
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (47tuc-web.jpg)
165.0 KB94 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-09-2011, 06:37 PM
desler's Avatar
desler
Registered User

desler is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Werribee, Australia
Posts: 1,053
Can't wait to see the results mate!

Radical change! Your more game than me! I'm just happy that everything works when I plug it in! haha!

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-09-2011, 06:42 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,165
Nice and sharp. The processing though has left a donut hole in the centre - a lasso or something used in the processing taming the core?

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-09-2011, 06:44 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,077
Nice round stars, no burning. It's working!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-09-2011, 07:47 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar View Post

This was only a test after making some radical changes to the camera settings and getting everything well balanced in software. I need to do some more testing before I can reveal the changes made.



Hi Res Version
Intruiging...... Radical changes.

I have just been bench testing my qhy9 to determine it's gain and offset, using this process
http://www.cool.id.au/astronomy/Neb_...d%20Offset.pdf

I came up with 20 gain and 80 offset, an interesting process, I was aware of the offset but not quite so with determining the gain .... But got it now so set and forget at -20C

Guess we will just have to wait to see what the radical changes are

Didn't realize tuc47 was so blue....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-09-2011, 08:29 AM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by desler View Post
Can't wait to see the results mate!

Radical change! Your more game than me! I'm just happy that everything works when I plug it in! haha!

Darren
Thanks Mate. Well radical for me anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Nice and sharp. The processing though has left a donut hole in the centre - a lasso or something used in the processing taming the core?

Greg.
I noticed that myself Greg. It will need a bit of a rework I think.

Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Nice round stars, no burning. It's working!
Thanks Mark.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy View Post
Intruiging...... Radical changes.

I have just been bench testing my qhy9 to determine it's gain and offset, using this process
http://www.cool.id.au/astronomy/Neb_...d%20Offset.pdf

I came up with 20 gain and 80 offset, an interesting process, I was aware of the offset but not quite so with determining the gain .... But got it now so set and forget at -20C

Guess we will just have to wait to see what the radical changes are

Didn't realize tuc47 was so blue....
Thanks Clive. The big change is what you are up to now. Increasing the gain to 40% and offset to 102 was rather a frightening thing to do after running the camera at 1 and 125 for so long. I must say it will be interesting to see what some long exposures hold with this change.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-09-2011, 08:39 AM
mill's Avatar
mill (Martin)
sword collector

mill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Evelyn
Posts: 2,925
Mate what happened to the right and left bottom corners??
They are blueish
To me it looks like the gain has gone a wee bit too high
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-09-2011, 09:11 AM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by mill View Post
Mate what happened to the right and left bottom corners??
They are blueish
To me it looks like the gain has gone a wee bit too high

I am inclined to agree with you Marty. This was purely experimental and I will be doing another test of these settings on an easier target with some other settings.

I have included a black and white version and an inverted version of the 120sec stacked image on it's own. This looks much better. Probably my processing skills are a bit rusty or don't exist.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Invert.jpg)
190.3 KB15 views
Click for full-size image (Black-and-white.jpg)
197.5 KB24 views
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-09-2011, 08:38 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
Hi Doug,

A very sharp photo with detail right to the core.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement