Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-02-2006, 02:49 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
If you had a choice which high end Refractor

Just dreaming at the moment but if you had a choice which widefield refractor would you use or recommend for imaging DSO's.

Takahashi - FSQ-106N f/5
http://www.optcorp.com/product.aspx?...9-2-83-996-882

TeleVue - NP-101 - 3.97" f/5.4
http://www.optcorp.com/product.aspx?...-2-83-996-1489

William Optics - FLT-110 - 110mm, f/6.5
http://www.optcorp.com/product.aspx?...-2-83-996-2438

Or anything else.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-02-2006, 02:54 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Benchmark standard

Don't come much better than the original 4" f5 TV Genesis. A joy to use, every time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-02-2006, 02:56 PM
Vermin's Avatar
Vermin (Tom)
Cloud dodger

Vermin is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hobart
Posts: 584
My choice would have to be the NP101.

But I'm biased, I have a TV101, an NP127 would be on my wish list.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-02-2006, 03:05 PM
JohnG's Avatar
JohnG (John)
Looking Down From Above

JohnG is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cootamundra, NSW
Posts: 1,711
As where dreaming, why not add something that is really going to pull those photons in:

Takahashi TOA-130 or better still TOA-150.

Would love my 102 to grow up to one of those one day........keep on dreaming. JG

JohnG
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-02-2006, 04:20 PM
Robert_T's Avatar
Robert_T
aiming for 2nd Halley's

Robert_T is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,959
that sounds like a very Daaanngerous question to be asking Tony....

where is this heading and is your wallet re-inforced?

the good things is they're relatively small and unimposing compared to a big SCT or Dob... you could easily convince you know who that it only costs a couple hundred bucks
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-02-2006, 09:09 PM
mickoking's Avatar
mickoking
Vagabond

mickoking is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: China
Posts: 1,477
TAKAHASHI
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-02-2006, 09:36 PM
norm's Avatar
norm
Registered User

norm is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ashfield NSW
Posts: 778
Astrophyics
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24-02-2006, 10:24 PM
acropolite's Avatar
acropolite (Phil)
Registered User

acropolite is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
Same here Astrophysics Starfire, the bigger the better...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-02-2006, 09:38 AM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66
Don't come much better than the original 4" f5 TV Genesis. A joy to use, every time.
Well it was a great scope in its day but its' day was 15 yrs ago, these were 1st introduced in 1988. Optical technology, particularly in respect to exotic glass types has advanced a long way in the last 18 years. Extending Al Naglers own words "we only ever replace an eyepiece with a better one, never for lack of sales", I can only assume the same philosophy applies to his telescopes. That all having been said I have used a TV Genesis SDF (F5.4) and it was a superb scope, competitive with modern premium Petzval design APO's but just a tad behind them IMO.

CS-John B
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25-02-2006, 10:44 AM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vermin
My choice would have to be the NP101.

But I'm biased, I have a TV101, an NP127 would be on my wish list.
Tony/Vermin

Ultimately we are splitting hairs here between the absolute cream of 4" Telescopes, which includes the previously mentioned TV Genesis BTW.

However FWIW, I know of several very experienced imagers in the US (they are as patriotic as it comes when talking home grown products BTW, eg: Televue) who rate the Japanese made Tak FSQ106 as slighly superior to the TV NP 101, predominantly due to a superior focuser. They believe it is slighly smoother and easier to bring images to focus. Also the TV focuser is single speed only and has been known to "creep" with very heavy imaging loads. Testimony to this is the fact that the FSQ-106 is a big seller in the US notwithstanding that the homegrown TV NP101 is about $US 500 cheaper over there.

You can also throw the 4" TMB triplet into the equation as well, as it's a great package. You can probably forget about the Astrophysics because they are almost impossible to source, notwithstanding the outstanding quality.

Ultimately your going to be very happy with any of these scopes.
FWIW my choice would be the Takahashi FSQ 106 in a nail biter.

CS-John B

Last edited by ausastronomer; 25-02-2006 at 12:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 25-02-2006, 10:45 AM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,902
I've seen a 8" or 9" apo at astro optical once, they said it was a $27K grand job, looked nice!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 25-02-2006, 11:04 AM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by g__day
I've seen a 8" or 9" apo at astro optical once, they said it was a $27K grand job, looked nice!
I am just wondering what the quality of that 8" APO was like considering this 8" Takahashi APO including mount is $US 167k

http://www.buytelescopes.com/product...=1&pid=1727&m=

BTW for the asking price of $US 167k the Japs fly over and install it in your observatory for you

Also the the last Astrophysics 180 EDF Starfire (7" OTA only) went for $US 55,000 on Astromart 2nd hand about a year ago.

CS-John B
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 25-02-2006, 12:25 PM
Dave47tuc's Avatar
Dave47tuc (David)
IIS member 65

Dave47tuc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mornington peninsula. Victoria.
Posts: 1,658
Tony,
I'm with john. The Takahashi FSQ 106 on a EM200 mount would be my choice for imaging.

For just observing it would be the NP101 which I have used a lot. Very nice scope.

For drool factor (refractor) have a nice scope we use from time to time below. Trying to get it to Snake Valley next weekend.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (AP 130.JPG)
111.6 KB46 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement