Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 22-02-2006, 11:30 AM
Robert_T's Avatar
Robert_T
aiming for 2nd Halley's

Robert_T is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,959
SO So SATURN 21st Feb 06

Hi All, had a go at Saturn last night with the C9.25.

Seeing was pretty bad, around 3-4/10 though toward the end of my run has improved a little to 4-5 out of ten for the result posted here. Best 1041 frames from 2000 at 10fps and 1/10s. I had to have gain up around 50% even at 1/10 s as transparency was pretty poor too. I've done better, but s'pose I've done worse too.

One at left was with LR deconvolution, at right without LR just some Soft Sharpen.

cheers,
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (saturnnexmage_2006-02-21_21-50_0007_1041frmsAstraImageLRjpg.jpg)
38.6 KB32 views
Click for full-size image (saturnnexmage_2006-02-21_21-50_0007_1041frmsjpg.jpg)
36.4 KB33 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-02-2006, 11:40 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,635
Mate why do you call these so-so?
I think they're great, especially the LR Deco version.

I'd be wrapped with these.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-02-2006, 11:46 AM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
i know how you feel, if it not better than the last one after that initial registax run, then i almost delete the avi.

a day later, i come back and find that yes it is not too bad at all. With all the great jupiters and saturns over the last coupla months, this downturn in the seeing has to mean non perfect images.

we don't have to like it, just accept it. If i don't post my bad ones, asimov craps on me from a dizzy height!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-02-2006, 12:26 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Rob

They're OK. Not your best by a long chalk, but not bad.

I'll post one of my saturn's from last weekend shortly using exactly the same gear and we can compare.

There's real value in being able to compare your "average" shots with your best. It gives me a real measure of the effect of seeing and other variables, and for that I am very grateful.

So keep posting mate. They're all good.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-02-2006, 02:39 PM
EzyStyles's Avatar
EzyStyles (Eric)
I HATE COMA!

EzyStyles is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,208
so so saturn?? they are great Rob!!
keep them coming.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22-02-2006, 05:14 PM
Robert_T's Avatar
Robert_T
aiming for 2nd Halley's

Robert_T is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,959
I guess there's been so many outstanding images just recently ones like this pale in comparison

good points from Matt and DP that we need to post our mediocre images and our shockers (and the conditions under which they were obtained) as it helps to put into perspective what the key factors that are missing but needed for the really stunning shots

cheers,
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-02-2006, 06:59 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
I think their great images Robert!

I can't get near those 2 'so-so' shots with the scope I'm using so yeah, their nice! Good colour/CD/image scale.

With that many frames stacked I would have expected less grain, what do you reckon that's due to?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-02-2006, 08:03 PM
Robert_T's Avatar
Robert_T
aiming for 2nd Halley's

Robert_T is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by asimov

With that many frames stacked I would have expected less grain, what do you reckon that's due to?
Not entirely sure but for me generally Gain = Grain, and as the transparency was poor I had to have the gain up around 40-50%. Might have pushed the sharpening a little too much as well . Unless the seeing's fantastic I always find it's a compromise between over sharpening to reveal detail which unfortunately brings out more noise as well.

cheers matee,
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement