Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 03-04-2011, 09:40 AM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
8" F2.8 Newt

I came across these powernewts the other day and thought it may be of interest. 8" F2.8 corrected newt with carbon fibre or steel tube. A little expensive but I'm sure the corrector would cost da bomb. They mention 65mm backfocus from corrector to sensor in the user manual and that may be to short for mono cameras with wheels and an OAG. But worth a look.

Last edited by Tandum; 03-04-2011 at 09:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-04-2011, 10:32 AM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Damn you Robin. Why did you post this? LOL
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-2011, 10:37 AM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
Sorry nettie. I recon you could just get a 2" wynne corrector, about $1250, and plug it into a cheap 8" F4 to get a similar speed
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-04-2011, 11:08 AM
Zaps
Registered User

Zaps is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 349
Interesting! An Israeli company. But not a lot of information online about these instruments aside from the stuff on their own site. Does anyone know how long they've been around?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-04-2011, 06:04 PM
garymck (Gary)
Registered User

garymck is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Geelong
Posts: 822
Its just an 8" f4 GSO newt with a Keller corrector and a mountain of mark up added. Save your dough...
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-04-2011, 05:52 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
I'm afraid I am in the same camp as Gary, and while I like to see innovation and progress, to me it is headed past the point of diminishing returns.
I use an F4 AT8", and it is similar or the same as this variant. At f4 it is tricky enough to collimate and focus, I can only imaging what it will be like at F2.8. And while you are gaining an obvious light collection advantage, is it really worth the extra cost and collimation effort? To me not.
Each to their own though of course.
Gary
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement