Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 23-02-2011, 01:45 PM
toc (Tim)
Registered User

toc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 863
c14 and a EQ6

Sorry if this is out of order on this forum, but for visual and Planetary webcam work, would the 12 inch be ok on an EQ6? I don't expect it to be rock solid...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-02-2011, 04:40 PM
el_draco (Rom)
Politically incorrect.

el_draco is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tasmania (South end)
Posts: 2,315
on an EQ6?

Quote:
Originally Posted by toc View Post
Sorry if this is out of order on this forum, but for visual and Planetary webcam work, would the 12 inch be ok on an EQ6? I don't expect it to be rock solid...
It would probably crush it...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-02-2011, 06:22 PM
robz (Robert)
Registered User

robz is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Perth West Australia
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by toc View Post
Sorry if this is out of order on this forum, but for visual and Planetary webcam work, would the 12 inch be ok on an EQ6? I don't expect it to be rock solid...
Tim, in my opinion, after having talked to many who have used the 12 with the EQ6, it will be fine for planetary visual and photography/capture.

Bear in mind that the any extras that are going to be mounted on or hanging off that tube may bring you to thin ice territory.

The mount can handle 20kg(conservatively - and can be tweaked to handle more)............the 12 inch Meade SCT OTA is a tad over 16kg, so you could still use a large eyepeice or compact camera and a Telrad, star diagonal and still be within limits.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-02-2011, 10:13 PM
trek1701's Avatar
trek1701 (Mark)
Registered User

trek1701 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 203
The Duckadang Celestron C14 sitting on an NEQ6Pro





http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=60499
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-02-2011, 11:27 AM
robz (Robert)
Registered User

robz is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Perth West Australia
Posts: 415
I have been informed by one person here in Perth that the EQ6 when heavily tweaked/worked on has been used successfully in imaging with a payload of 28kg.

This of course is is an exception to the rule, but does indicate that 16-20 kg for non critical work is definately possible with the EQ6.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-02-2011, 05:50 AM
macsen2 (Mac)
Registered User

macsen2 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: bundaberg
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by toc View Post
Sorry if this is out of order on this forum, but for visual and Planetary webcam work, would the 12 inch be ok on an EQ6? I don't expect it to be rock solid...
.................using a 12 on an EQ6,no problem..for guiding using a gso finder scope[shortened 30mm]with a dsi pro 11[very light system]................................... ..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-02-2011, 08:02 AM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,760
The thread title refers to a C14 but the discussion seems to centre more around a 12". The C14 in the Duckadang thread mentioned below is mine and I did indeed mount the C14 on an NEQ6Pro. But only to get it off the ground and to try some preliminary collimation tweaks - not to actually use either visually or for imaging. The weight that had to be carried on the weight bar to balance the bare scope was huge - and balancing really difficult. I would not recommend that course to anyone.
The C14 weighed 25 kgs or so with the rings and Losmandy bar attached and nothing else. If you add a decent eyepiece and diagonal, you can add another 1-2 Kgs to that.
A 12" SCT would be another issue if the weight was significantly below that - and I see from the discussion that there may be a difference of 6 Kgs or more in the bare OTAs. That may bring it within an EQ6's range but it would still be at the top end of that range and therefore not much use for imaging. It would be OK for visual and it would track OK though. You'd have to try to keep the slew rates down to reduce stress and load on the motors and other components but it would be manageable.
Peter
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-02-2011, 09:00 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
I own a C14 too and I would not recommend putting it on an EQ6. The mount is not built for that sort of stress. If you are going to buy a C14 don't skimp on the mount.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-02-2011, 04:44 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
I've just weighed my 12" Lx OTA with Losmandy dovetail and ADM minirail guide bar it's 17.2Kg
I was considering taking it off the forks (which weigh 15.7Kg by the way)
and putting it on the NEQ6pro....by the time you add the spectroscope/ cameras etc etc I don't think the NEQ6 is up to the job....the OTA is going back onto the forks.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25-02-2011, 04:49 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
a losmandy g11 should handle a c14.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 25-02-2011, 05:19 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by icytailmark View Post
a losmandy g11 should handle a c14.
Should....they can carry 60lbs (about 27kgs).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 25-02-2011, 05:39 PM
toc (Tim)
Registered User

toc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmrid View Post
The thread title refers to a C14 but the discussion seems to centre more around a 12".
Yes this little discussion was originally part of a for-sale thread for a Meade 12" ACF scope. I think the moderator made little boo boo when they moved it here.

FWIW, Ive bought the 12 inch, so it served its purpose
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 25-02-2011, 05:42 PM
toc (Tim)
Registered User

toc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 863
In another thread, there is a comment about how Meade put a heavy iron counter weight in the back of the 12 inch scope, apparently to balance it on a fork mount. Im probably to much of a wimp to try and remove it though. I have a bad track record of 'improving' stuff
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 25-02-2011, 05:43 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
yes, but did you also buy a NEQ6 mount??
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 25-02-2011, 05:45 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Tim,
could you link to that thread?
I've had the 12" for the past six years and never heard of the "big iron weight" - mind you I've never pulled the OTA apart!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 25-02-2011, 05:50 PM
robz (Robert)
Registered User

robz is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Perth West Australia
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by toc View Post
In another thread, there is a comment about how Meade put a heavy iron counter weight in the back of the 12 inch scope, apparently to balance it on a fork mount. Im probably to much of a wimp to try and remove it though. I have a bad track record of 'improving' stuff
Now that's interesting!...............anyone else care to comment?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 25-02-2011, 09:06 PM
toc (Tim)
Registered User

toc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
yes, but did you also buy a NEQ6 mount??
Nope - That is the next task Im actually considering a GOTOless G11 as well - not sure I can come up with the 4+ grand for the full GOTO'ed G11. Im only going to be using the 12 inch for Visual for the semi long term, so I can probably get by with an EQ6 I think.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 25-02-2011, 09:09 PM
toc (Tim)
Registered User

toc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlin66 View Post
Tim,
could you link to that thread?
I've had the 12" for the past six years and never heard of the "big iron weight" - mind you I've never pulled the OTA apart!
This is the link for removing the weight from the 7inch MAK:

http://www.astromart.com/articles/ar...article_id=658

Apparently they put them in the 10 and 12 inch SCT's as well, but I havent seen pics of that
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 25-02-2011, 09:41 PM
toc (Tim)
Registered User

toc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 863
Just further on this: Found a link on the Meade yahoo group that details removing the internal counter weight on the LX200 12 inch:

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/s...A-disassembly/
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 26-02-2011, 12:27 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Just waiting on membership so I can access the info....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement