Ok, so here's a couple of quotes from this article, which should serve to summarise it:
Quote:
Working with colleagues Francisco Guinea and Jose Gonzalez, San-Jose claims to have shown that the energy landscape of graphene rippling in 2D and that of the Higgs field in 3D, are described by similar "Mexican hat" potentials. Like a sombrero, the potential energy starts high in the centre but quickly falls away to a minimum in any direction. The negative curvature at the top ensures that symmetry will break spontaneously – any push from the centre sends the system down towards a stable point in the brim, just where the edge of the hat begins to climb again.
In the case of graphene, the negative curvature is a result of how graphene responds to being stretched or compressed. In particle physics, negative curvature is a result of the relationship between the Higgs field and the "bare" mass of the Higgs boson. In order to be unstable, this bare mass must be imaginary – the Higgs boson acquires a real, effective mass when the field reaches its true stable ground state.
|
So this guy is suggesting that studying the 'energy landscape' of Graphene, may tell us more about the behaviours in Higgs quantum field theory, the details of which, are 'mathematically difficult'.
(So this reminds me of the analogy developed for studying Hawking Radiation. Ie: using lasers colliding in the optical domain, to create an artificial black hole).
I suppose any new information discovered using this analogy, might speed up the hunt for the Higgs … gotta find it before they can predict its behaviours under variable conditions, eh ??
Cheers