Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-11-2010, 12:45 AM
Waxing_Gibbous's Avatar
Waxing_Gibbous (Peter)
Grumpy Old Man-Child

Waxing_Gibbous is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Gippsland
Posts: 1,768
Question Focal Reducers for Visual?

I should know this but I don't. Can focal reducers be used - successfuly -for visual obs? What I mean by this is; what kind of image degredation if any) can you expect and what effect (if any) will it have on eyepieces.
Sometimes I'd like a bit larger FoV than I get at f7.5 and Tak sells a reducer/flattener (f6.3) for the TOA/TSA series that gets excellent reports for AP but I can't find any reference for visual.
Thanks,
Peter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-11-2010, 08:59 AM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
I would imagine for visual it's just a case of using a different eyepiece, no matter how you play it the same amount of light comes in.
Focal reducers flatten the field so it can project onto a flat surface, the ol mark one eyeballs surface of light collection is curved so some degradation will occur to either the outside of the field or inside depending on where you focus. This will be consistent for all eyepieces as you have changed the light path for that flat surface.

Want a bigger FOV get an ethos.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-11-2010, 11:32 AM
Waxing_Gibbous's Avatar
Waxing_Gibbous (Peter)
Grumpy Old Man-Child

Waxing_Gibbous is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Gippsland
Posts: 1,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alchemy View Post
.....

Want a bigger FOV get an ethos.
The Reducer is cheaper!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-11-2010, 01:20 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
borg make a reducer for visual/photography - peter tan sells them in HK - i think they aren't cheap though, about $400 if i remember rightly
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-11-2010, 03:48 PM
Waxing_Gibbous's Avatar
Waxing_Gibbous (Peter)
Grumpy Old Man-Child

Waxing_Gibbous is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Gippsland
Posts: 1,768
No, you are correct sir. They are not cheap by a long shot. The Tak is about the same - $420ish.
Still. Cheaper than a Lomo 80/400 or an NP101.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement