Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-08-2010, 05:03 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post Unusual Orbits for Planetary System

Astronomers at the 216th meeting of the American Astronomical Society announced that the orbit of one of the planets of the Upsilon Andromedae system, planet "C", was inclined at an angle of about 30 degrees to the plane of the rest of the system....McArthur et al, 2010.

(The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 715, Issue 2, pp. 1203-1220 (2010))

The planet possibly ended up in its present orbital inclination due to some violent encounter(s) sometime after the formation of the system. The possible cause was most likely planet to planet scattering due to the gravitational interactions between the planets after their formation. Another mechanism may have been through gravitational perturbations via ups And B, which is a red dwarf that is currently separated from Star A by around 750AU. It's likely that it may have been closer to the main star in the past.

Last edited by renormalised; 26-08-2010 at 05:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-08-2010, 08:29 PM
CraigS's Avatar
CraigS
Unpredictable

CraigS is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,023
Gee;

"Previous minimum masses for the planets given by radial velocity studies put the minimum mass for planet c at 2 Jupiters and for planet d at 4 Jupiters. The new, exact masses, found by astrometry are 14 Jupiters for planet c and 10 Jupiters for planet d."

Man that's a huge difference ! They say they improved the precision of Radial Velocity measurements by using one of the Hubble Fine Guidance Sensors (FGSs) on the Hubble Telescope, to come up with this result.

Got to make you wonder about the accuracy Radial Velocity measurements are in general (eg: galaxy RVs). Although, I suppose trying measure the RVs of a couple of planets 44 light years away might be fairly prone to error, however.

Interesting again.
Thanks Carl,
Cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement