Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-07-2010, 10:11 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
First go at Rho Ophiuchus

2.5 hours standing in the cold - street lights, moonlight, neighbours lights and headlights.

The technical stuff. A stack of 20 frames out of 32, approx 1.8 hours. The longest frame was 9 mins - unguided, with several at 7 mins, 6 mins, 5 mins, 4mins, 3 mins and 2 mins.

ES 80, Canon Kiss F, Takahashi EM-200B - no fringing - focus was as sharp as could be with a mask. Tracking was very good unguided, even over 9 mins.

Pixinsight - Calibrated raw files with master dark only - histogram correction, cropped to remove the dew spots (at least I think that's what they were), ACDNR noise reduction, saved file as 32 bit floating point .fit then batch converted to .jpeg

Second run alongside

The dreaded vertical stripes are difficult to get rid of.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (integration_1.jpg)
23.6 KB123 views
Click for full-size image (Rhooph.jpg)
63.0 KB104 views

Last edited by rcheshire; 27-07-2010 at 12:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-07-2010, 11:43 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Jeez Rowland, however you look at it... that's a dramatic shot. Those beautiful Antaric (!) rays really add to the shot along with the gas/dust.

9 mins unguided eh? Polar alignment must be spot on... forget it, just read that you're using a Tak mount!!!

Regardless of all technical issues, it has that 'something' that one wants from an astro-image - well done.
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-07-2010, 12:45 AM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
HI Doug. Thanks for the encouragement. I've posted a second run alongside the original for comparison. It's an improvement I think, and I would welcome a critique to improve my skills.

Last edited by rcheshire; 27-07-2010 at 07:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-07-2010, 11:04 AM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcheshire View Post
HI Doug. Thanks for the encouragement. I've posted a second run alongside the original for comparison. It's an improvement I think, and I would welcome a critique to improve my skills.
I think a mid point between the 2 versions would be the sweet spot for me Rowland. The new one has lost that wonderful dustiness.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-07-2010, 05:38 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Here are the latest attempts. Used 31 frames this time round. Might try an HDR composite.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (integration11_1.jpg)
42.9 KB33 views
Click for full-size image (integration10.jpg)
43.7 KB52 views

Last edited by rcheshire; 29-07-2010 at 05:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-07-2010, 10:32 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
I like the 2nd one Rowland - nice contrast without losing that lovely dust.
Good exercise this - the more you play around in PS, the more you learn!
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-08-2010, 11:28 AM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Reprocessed - fixed black point clipping - better balance all round - histogram attached if anyone feels inclined to comment. Some hot pixels here and there.

Backed off on the wavelet transformation and dark structure enhancement that comes with Pixinsight.

A filter should fix the stripes and or longer exposures. Looking forward to a clear dark night to try again.

Cheers.

Rowland.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (roophhisto.jpg)
79.3 KB33 views
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2010, 11:23 PM
luigi
Registered User

luigi is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 438
Really nice Rowland the filtering rays to me enhance the photo, very interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-08-2010, 06:41 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Hi Luis. It's not everyone's cup-of-tea, and I didn't really know what to expect when I took the shots.

It could be better framed - next time round. A focal reducer would increase the FOV and take in more of the unique features in that part of the sky.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-08-2010, 02:30 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,799
I have to qgree,very interesting image indeed, quite like it really.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-08-2010, 04:16 AM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Thanks Leon. It's a bit different. Might try an uncropped version.

Last edited by rcheshire; 05-08-2010 at 04:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement