Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-07-2010, 08:41 PM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Bahtinov mask question?

Hi fellow astrophotographers. I have a question about using a Bahtinov mask with an 80mm refractor and DSLR?

I notice that the mask works fine on bright objects such as Venus, the spikes are clearly visible in the view finder. Antares is a different matter, it's not as bright and the diffraction spikes are impossible to see. So focus is a matter of the sharpest blur if that makes sense.

Would it be better to have a mask with finer, that is narrower elements - currently about 6mm - would that improve definition of the spikes?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-07-2010, 08:51 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
I've made one for my ED80 & DSLR 400D but haven't had the right weather to test it. To me, it'd make more sense taking a (correct) exposure of the star & making focus adjustments that way than using the view finder.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-07-2010, 10:01 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Rowland - Bahtinov masks aren't really used that way.

Firstly, don't use a planet as it's a disk. Use a point-source of light such as a medium-bright star only. The planet will not work - at all.

Secondly, don't view it through the viewfinder - you won't be able to see the diffraction pattern on a star anyway. Center the star in your viewfinder and then take a 5-10 second exposure at ISO800 or so. Zoom in to 10x and see the pattern on your rear screen. Keep adjusting focus in the same direction and taking shots until you see the central bar in position. If you go too far, come back.

Here's a page out of a manual I wrote a while back where you can see the progression to focus and then beyond it.

Once you've reached it - don't forget to take the mask off. I do this ALL the time. LOL!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (screen-capture.jpg)
162.4 KB57 views

Last edited by Omaroo; 07-07-2010 at 10:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-07-2010, 01:54 AM
rcheshire's Avatar
rcheshire (Rowland)
Registered User

rcheshire is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Geelong
Posts: 2,617
Thanks guys. That makes much more sense, and is fairly obvious when you think of it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-07-2010, 11:45 AM
bartman's Avatar
bartman (Bart)
1 of 7 of 9

bartman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,968
Where can I get a mask for my DSLR Chris?
Cheers
Bartman
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-07-2010, 12:11 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
PM'd Bart.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-07-2010, 01:29 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Chris,

How can I get hold of one of those for my 200mm f/2.8L II USM? It's a 72mm filter mount.

Cheers, buddy.

H
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-07-2010, 01:56 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
PM'd Humayun
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-07-2010, 03:16 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Humayun - I use my 52mm filter and connect it to a 72mm adapter I made up for my larger lenses. Works great - one mask does the lot.

Sorry about the pic quality...
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (photo.jpg)
80.9 KB21 views
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-07-2010, 05:21 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,801
By the way H you wont need a B/Mask on the Tak, it just snaps into focus.

I am 60 and I have never used any computer, and/or any focusing device to get focus, and I am half blind, LOL, and some of my pics are pretty reasonable

Just move it into and past focus, you will see the B/Mask effect instantly, in the scope.

I bought one once and sold it the next day totally useless on a Tak mate.

But that is only MHO

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-07-2010, 05:37 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Leon,

Yep, I'm expecting the FSQ to be far easier to focus than any other scope I've had in the past. Was just wondering about it for the 200mm lens.

Hopefully first light this weekend!

Will get in touch with you regarding a couple of adapters -- I have no idea what to use a couple of them for.

H
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-07-2010, 05:37 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Thanks, Chris!

H
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-07-2010, 07:48 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,801
Don't ya, well we surly can fix that.

Leon
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement