Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-06-2010, 05:31 PM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
FF dslr's - yay or nay?

Hey guys

I notice than pretty much everyone is using dslr's with what I call small chips - i.e. not full frame 35mm sensors like in the Canon 5D or 1Ds series or Nikon D3 series.

Do the full frame dslr's show lots of vignetting/field curvature when plugged into something like a 80ED or 120ED refractor?

hope this makes sense!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-06-2010, 05:47 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Field curvature will be minimised by a field flattener. If you can get one specific for your scope, great, but a "generic" flattener will do.

Vignetting can be combated by getting a large enough focuser so that the light path to the ff CCD isn't hampered by anything internally. You'll need at least a 2" focuser or larger for a 35mm CCD chip. Same goes for the flatteners and anything else you connect up in the imaging train. Anything can cause vignetting, but flatteners can be a source of the problem. Sometimes, it's unavoidable, so you have to live with it and just adjust your piccies accordingly.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-06-2010, 09:52 PM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
thanks, very helpful
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-06-2010, 06:10 AM
j.w.white (John)
Registered User

j.w.white is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 2
I shoot with the Nikon D700 and love the wide field on my EdgeHD 800. It's kind of cheating in that the field flattener is already build in, but it is sharp out to the edges of the chip. Vignetting is not that big of an issue and is easily controlled by processing with image flats. My biggest gripe with the D700 (aside from the diminished red sensitivity - no one yet mods these) is the weight. I'm getting a much lighter camera (will be modded!) to use on my Meade 5000 APO so the crayford focuser will not be constantly pulling out.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M27-web.jpg)
109.0 KB31 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-06-2010, 08:11 AM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
I'm using 1 series Canon's, which are about the heaviest dslr's out there! I think no matter what I get I'll need to get a better focuser.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-06-2010, 09:51 AM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
It depends on the scope. My VC200L was made originally to illuminate a 35mm full frame camera. The small refractors that are popular as imaging scopes don't seem to have as big a light cone so there will be some light loss in the corners. As long as there is some illumination to the corners it should be fixable with flats.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-06-2010, 10:31 PM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
if your asking if going and purchasing a FF dslr for astro use, i wouldn't bother get a dedicated astro CCD about the same price and 10x as good!

If you already have a FF dslr, well meh flats and cropping will clean them up but its all down to telescope design.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-06-2010, 11:58 PM
sejanus's Avatar
sejanus (Gavin)
Registered User

sejanus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Southern suburbs
Posts: 683
Yeah I already have ff dslr's hence the question.

The astro ccd's look very trick - maybe one day But I think I'd try and reach the limit of the dslr's first - there are some fantastic results from them around here & on the web.

The cameras are 21mp so even if I need to crop them a bit to help vignetting wise I'd imagine there'd still be quite a few pixels left over!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-06-2010, 12:05 AM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
learn how to take flats.
and just chuck it on and see what happens.! figure out the details later.!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-06-2010, 02:23 AM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
I found when imaging with my 5D Mark II that flats have to be absolutely critical.

If the flats are not well-illuminated, then, the stacking algorithms make a meal of your data. The one I use, anyway.

H
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement