Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-05-2010, 02:37 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Rcw58

Hi All,

Following on from the wide field "Environs of the Hibiscus" post, I made comment on the framing, specifically what appears to be featureless void to the lower left.

While acquiring data for the wide field mosaic, I was fascinated by what I saw in the data set. This prompted me to acquired data at a longer focal length to provide a magnified view of intriguing nebula known as RCW58 - Wolf-Rayet Bubble.

Located in the constellation Carina, an extremely dim shell of gas forms a ring like appearance around the Wolf-Rayet star HD96548. Designated RCW58, the expanding bubble of gas has formed as a result of the central star ejecting stellar matter outward at extremely high velocity. Another example of a Wolf-Rayet star is NGC6164.

I found this to be a tough target being very dim and to make matters challenging the data acquired was mediocre, compounded by bad seeing and time constraints. Only 4.5hrs worth of filtered RGB. I created a synthetic lum to combat noise. Blue cast gradients were a nightmare to remove and are still present in areas. The target offset from center is intentional given guide star selection was limited. I could have cropped the view, but feel this adds a twist to the norm.

Basic workflow used, so no surprises. Perhaps the exception in adding a heavily DDP stretched and colour saturated RGB layer (gradient corrected) which was layered as a softlight blend to boost colours. Needs more data, but it will suffice for now.

Thanks for looking!

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-05-2010, 02:58 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Hmm, very nice. I like the radial structure visible in the nebulosity.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-05-2010, 03:14 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Thanks Roger! Certainly needs some focal length and good seeing. Unfortunately I failed with the latter. Angular size of 7'x9', so quite small.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-05-2010, 03:21 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,792
Jase mate that is just great, man you are good at this stuff, not often, but when you do it it is magazine quality.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-05-2010, 03:21 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,268
Well done

Thor's helmet is also a WR

what is it's specific location and VB or WR catalogue designation Jase
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-05-2010, 03:31 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Nice shot, as usual
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-05-2010, 03:34 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
Jase mate that is just great, man you are good at this stuff, not often, but when you do it it is magazine quality.

Leon
Cheers Leon. Equipment has much to do with it. Choosing the right tool for the job. Had to pull a rabbit out of the hat with processing to get this one looking 'respectable'. Not the best data. I enjoy processing data of different focal lengths as they require different techniques to bring out the details. Thanks again mate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
Well done

Thor's helmet is also a WR

what is it's specific location and VB or WR catalogue designation Jase
Cheers Tevor. Thor's...indeed it is. Perhaps I should link to that as well. Nah...will not get too carried away. RCW58 is WR40 if I'm not mistaken. J2000: RA 11:06:18 Dec -65:43:00

Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Nice shot, as usual
Thanks Carl!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28-05-2010, 03:55 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,268
Jase hope you don't mind but here is a good reference to WR stars

http://www.peripatus.gen.nz/Astronomy/WolRaySta.html

WR 40 at vb 7.85 although small for those with longer FL it's a great target

I also notice a predominance in the list for WR's in Cygnus

well worth imaging IMO

Last edited by TrevorW; 28-05-2010 at 04:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 28-05-2010, 04:03 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
No problems at all Trevor.

In case people are wondering, attached is a map detailing the location of RCW58 cross referenced to the wide field image. The red reticle marks the spot.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (RCW58map.jpg)
191.1 KB37 views
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28-05-2010, 04:47 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,177
A fascinating object Jase. Nicely imaged.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 28-05-2010, 05:02 PM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by jase View Post
In case people are wondering, attached is a map detailing the location of RCW58 cross referenced to the wide field image. The red reticle marks the spot.
You forgot to remove the red reticle in the original image Jase....oh wait....that's the bubble....



I love these wonderful beauties you present to us mate, excellent stuff.
What looks like empty space is full of wonders.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28-05-2010, 06:31 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Great image Jase.

Most definitely a tough one to image and process.

Regards

Steven
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 28-05-2010, 08:27 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
A fascinating object Jase. Nicely imaged.

Greg.
Thanks Greg! Something not often imaged adds an element of surprise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RB View Post
You forgot to remove the red reticle in the original image Jase....oh wait....that's the bubble....



I love these wonderful beauties you present to us mate, excellent stuff.
What looks like empty space is full of wonders.

Cheers RB! Always see the lighter side of things mate. Good stuff! Will be more careful next time with the reticle layer blending technique. Thanks for taking the time to check it out and make comment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
Great image Jase.

Most definitely a tough one to image and process.

Regards

Steven
Thank you Steven. I'm aware you recently imaged this object. Tough one it sure is. Nothing like a challenge!

====

Thanks all!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 30-05-2010, 08:51 AM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Interesting target Jase. Dificult with my equipment but always great to see some of the more obscure targets. Nice job on the processing considering your problems. I wouldn't know where to start. In fact I probably would have binned the lot and moved on to the next target/data.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 30-05-2010, 09:51 PM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
Thanks Doug! I generally throw data away only if its truly beyond repair. Subs that are of a low FWHM are keepers, even if they have satellite trails, cosmic ray hits etc. Data rejection algorithms clean these up so its not an issue. Severe gradients on the other hand take extra work. Photoshop is still the tool of choice in dealing with such nasties. Pleased you liked it. Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 30-05-2010, 10:48 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Nice image Jase. I hve viewed this through my 18" when I had it and an OIII filter. It is a really interesting target and well worth imaging at high resolution.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 30-05-2010, 11:14 PM
richardo's Avatar
richardo (Rich)
Love reflection Nebs !

richardo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Streaky Bay
Posts: 1,070
Pretty work Jase!
I find these Wolf Rayet objects very interesting indeed.

Thanks for sharing this one.

All the best
Rich
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 31-05-2010, 06:08 AM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Top work there Jase, you certainly know how to present clean natural looking pics, the stars look very colourfull and natural, im jealous , and excellent detail.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 31-05-2010, 11:56 PM
Tom Davis's Avatar
Tom Davis (Tom)
Registered User

Tom Davis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Inkom, ID USA
Posts: 589
That is a wonderful object and image!

Tom
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement