Quote:
Originally Posted by lhansen
Thanks Greg
That is certainly a much better effort than my original attempt at processing the image stack.
I think a bit more data is in order. The stars are still at bit 'fat'.
Lars
|
Well there are 2 solutions to that. One is to image when the seeing is great - not such a great solution. The other is to use deconvolution on the luminance and perhaps even the colours. That needs to occur on the master Lum, master red etc.
Also not sure if you used flats as there were a couple of dust donuts that were resistive to processing. Fresh flats would be handy if you did. They vary over time.
Greg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheeny
I like it!
Very nice team effort guys!
Al.
|
I thought it was good data, sensational data really.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jase
Room for improvement, but I like it. Seeing looks like it played havoc. Need to more selective on what subs you include in the stack I suspect. Well done guys.
|
Yes, tossing out weak subs is hard to do but you are better off doing that.
Greg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
I recon that's a great effort guys, some really nice res in there, not sure that the stars are that fat really Lars..?  it's a small FOV so the scale effect plays a roll here too..?
Nice work
Mike |
It is highly magnified for sure.
greg
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised
Very nice shot....good effort, guys  |
Thanks on behalf of Lars.
Quote:
Originally Posted by telecasterguru
Nice image and nice long tails, well captured and well processed. The dynamic duo.
Frank
|
Hehe, I don't mind processing good data. Lots of fun.
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb
Nice details. Great colors in there. Top work.  |
Thanks Marc. Lars did a good job of acquiring good data and that makes the processing relatively easy.
Greg.
