Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-05-2010, 03:55 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Perils of the Peer Review Process

http://www.scientificblogging.com/qu...pedantic_jerks

Regards

Steven
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-05-2010, 04:27 PM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
So you can lose out on being first to publish because someone else has a shorter review process.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-05-2010, 05:55 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by mithrandir View Post
So you can lose out on being first to publish because someone else has a shorter review process.
What is even more devestating is using the wrong font for a comma.

Reminds me of a supervisor I once had.

Regards

Steven
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-05-2010, 07:32 PM
Nesti (Mark)
Registered User

Nesti is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 799
Imagine trying to write a technical piece for a TV series on science, include all of the necessary technical jargon as well as a lay explanation of those terms so the audience doesn't get lost, then cover only the absolute minimum pathway through the entire concept from start to finish making sure you touch on all of the key contributors, you must present the concepts along the way making sure each piece relates to the whole picture, then once you've written the whole thing 3-4 times over, you're told it's too long by 40%, so then you cut it down by 40% while trying to retain as much meaning as possible...mind-you, you haven't got to the editing phase yet, you haven't done the graphics, or invited speakers, and all this is assuming you understand the content in the first place.

Accurate documentaries would be the most difficult thing to make.

Imagine doing a 12 part series on the evolution and meaning of General Relativity aimed at the general public?!

You would probably end up looking like Einstein yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-05-2010, 12:02 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
What is even more devestating is using the wrong font for a comma.

Reminds me of a supervisor I once had.

Regards

Steven
Tell me about it!!!

Or, if you get someone who has, for whatever reason entirely known to themselves only, has taken a disliking to you. That can stuff you up pretty well and good too.

People can be rather arbitrary and very pedantic at times.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-05-2010, 12:09 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nesti View Post
Imagine trying to write a technical piece for a TV series on science, include all of the necessary technical jargon as well as a lay explanation of those terms so the audience doesn't get lost, then cover only the absolute minimum pathway through the entire concept from start to finish making sure you touch on all of the key contributors, you must present the concepts along the way making sure each piece relates to the whole picture, then once you've written the whole thing 3-4 times over, you're told it's too long by 40%, so then you cut it down by 40% while trying to retain as much meaning as possible...mind-you, you haven't got to the editing phase yet, you haven't done the graphics, or invited speakers, and all this is assuming you understand the content in the first place.

Accurate documentaries would be the most difficult thing to make.

Imagine doing a 12 part series on the evolution and meaning of General Relativity aimed at the general public?!

You would probably end up looking like Einstein yourself.
Yep, with your hair looking like it just come out of a bad day at the barbers and your tongue poking out of your mouth...
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (einstein-tongue-out.jpg)
20.9 KB17 views
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-05-2010, 04:30 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Yep, with your hair looking like it just come out of a bad day at the barbers and your tongue poking out of your mouth...
That picture of Einstein was in one of his calmer moods.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-05-2010, 04:36 PM
Nesti (Mark)
Registered User

Nesti is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
That picture of Einstein was in one of his calmer moods.

Yeah, I think that one was taken just outside his front door at his home in Princeton; a reporter caught him off-guard exiting his home.

If you look at the photos of Einstein, you can see the difference before and after both SR and GR. In 15 years he aged 30-40 years.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-05-2010, 04:39 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nesti View Post
Yeah, I think that one was taken just outside his front door at his home in Princeton; a reporter caught him off-guard exiting his home.

If you look at the photos of Einstein, you can see the difference before and after both SR and GR. In 15 years he aged 30-40 years.
Nothing more than a simple case of time dilation.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-05-2010, 09:46 AM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
That picture of Einstein was in one of his calmer moods.
It was more in reference to his appearance than his mood
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 21-05-2010, 09:48 AM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nesti View Post
Yeah, I think that one was taken just outside his front door at his home in Princeton; a reporter caught him off-guard exiting his home.

If you look at the photos of Einstein, you can see the difference before and after both SR and GR. In 15 years he aged 30-40 years.
It's all relative, Mark....all relative
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28-05-2010, 07:20 PM
Nesti (Mark)
Registered User

Nesti is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 799
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
It's all relative, Mark....all relative

Yeah, must have felt like 30-40 years I bet!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement