Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-05-2010, 02:03 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,268
An excercise in futlity

How many have done this or similar

taken 1hr 18min in 6 minute subs and ended up missing the target altogethor

a starfield somewhere near NGC3576

Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (star field near ngc 3576 mas.jpg)
132.9 KB71 views

Last edited by TrevorW; 15-05-2010 at 02:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-05-2010, 02:09 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,177
Oops! Nice star field anyway.

On occasion when my go-tos have been way off it amazes me how hard it can be to locate some objects with a smallish CCD. A good way to spend an hour or so! It only has to be a fraction off.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-05-2010, 02:54 PM
desler's Avatar
desler
Registered User

desler is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Werribee, Australia
Posts: 1,053
As Greg said, a very nice star field!

Almost as good as my 100 minutes of 10 mins subs through the Bathinov mask!

It's all good fun.......

I've got the permanent pier in, and everything on top under a Telegizmo cover and for about three seconds last night, I could see a star!!!!!!
At least you got to see a star field!

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-05-2010, 03:09 PM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
Oh dear Haven't done that yet, but sure I will...

Nice colours and field regardless.

You don't check composition with some test frames first?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-05-2010, 03:15 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,268
Yeah Troy I do but with some targets you need to do long subs and even then you are not sure if you've got it as they are very faint in unprocessed TIF files even after some stretching but not having imaged the area before I wasn't sure what to expect
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-05-2010, 03:31 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,177
What capture software are you using? CCDsoft stretches the downloaded image so even a faint galaxy will show in a 4-10 second image. If it won't show even with that then it would probably not show in a normal long exposure either (say 2-3 hours total).

One exception is the Vela Supernova Remnant which hardly shows anything under a 1 minute exposure unless you are using O111 filters.

I sometimes open up a downloaded 10 minute test frame in CCDstack to check it out before committing to a 5 hour run. Especially to check focus and guiding errors.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-05-2010, 03:38 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,268
Thanks Greg

using Maxim to capture at moment but will try Nebulosity

a bit of inexperience and impatience not knowing what to expect from the OSC
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-05-2010, 04:01 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
That is a special image....think of it this way. You've taken the piccie of at least 40 to 50 civilisations, there

No obvious targets but there's certainly something there apart from just stars
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-05-2010, 05:06 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,378
well not bad - i have several pointless hours under the belt - with more to come probably
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16-05-2010, 12:24 AM
David Fitz-Henr's Avatar
David Fitz-Henr
Registered User

David Fitz-Henr is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bowen Mountain
Posts: 837
Well, at least you got something! I remember years ago taking some 60min hand guided exposures with film, only to find that I had the exposure set at 1/1000 sec !?!

Anyway, which starfield near NGC3576 were you after ???
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 16-05-2010, 12:44 AM
Tom Davis's Avatar
Tom Davis (Tom)
Registered User

Tom Davis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Inkom, ID USA
Posts: 589
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
How many have done this or similar

taken 1hr 18min in 6 minute subs and ended up missing the target altogethor

I have done this at least a half dozen times! Very frustrating for sure.

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16-05-2010, 10:20 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,268
Well it's nice to know we all make mistakes but it's all part of the fun I was aiming for NGC3576

next time I'll nail the little bugger
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 16-05-2010, 04:05 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
How many have done this or similar

taken 1hr 18min in 6 minute subs and ended up missing the target altogethor

a starfield somewhere near NGC3576

... Story of my (astro)life.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 16-05-2010, 06:39 PM
leinad's Avatar
leinad (Dan)
Registered User

leinad is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 1,307
Using binning 2x2 or 4x4, will assist in boosting the faint ones to test exp/frame the shot where needed.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 16-05-2010, 08:23 PM
dcalleja's Avatar
dcalleja
Registered User

dcalleja is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 515
I have done this also - Nice star colours though.

My other good trick is to set the imager running in single image mode without setting it to auto (ie: take 8 or 10 images) and walk off for an hour or so. Much fun.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 16-05-2010, 08:26 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
I think we all have done this at one stage or another. Youre no orphan.

Nice star field Trevor.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17-05-2010, 04:01 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,268
Thanks for the feedback

Marc. Daniel, Dan and Dougie

now here is where I am

http://live.astrometry.net/status.ph...01005-45866439

11:17:12 -62.12.26

NGC3576

11:11:32 -61.21.44

Cheers

Last edited by TrevorW; 17-05-2010 at 04:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17-05-2010, 05:20 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by desler View Post

Almost as good as my 100 minutes of 10 mins subs through the Bathinov mask!

It's all good fun.......
I know someone who not only excels at shooting through his bart mask, but on special occasions likes to capture in Small Jpeg too.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17-05-2010, 08:48 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Trevor,

I did this the other night. The Gemini wasn't playing ball. I was after the Rho Ophiuchus region and shot off a 5 minute test exposure. It was a very pretty starfield but was nowhere near Antares!

I think we've all done this!

H
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement