Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 03-12-2005, 02:51 PM
33South's Avatar
33South (Chris)
Registered User

33South is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wentworth Falls NSW
Posts: 1,112
Post I should be so Lucky

Astro Imaging news item from the Beeb

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4456988.stm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-12-2005, 08:23 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
This is essentially what "our" imaging guys do when they use stacking software like registax, while picking the best frames to stack.

I believe there is a lot more one could do with a sequence of images through the turbulent atmosphere, in order to reconstruct the unperturbed image. I find this problem quite fascinating and hope to look into it more deeply over the coming months, years...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-12-2005, 08:43 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
My Optics lecturer started something called speckle interferometry back in the seventies.We did not have the huge digital computing power in those days so we used real time Fourier computing with the incoming photons.
Did you guys see this for finding extrasolar planets 'visually'.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1130232242.htm

Bert
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2005, 08:55 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by avandonk
We did not have the huge digital computing power in those days so we used real time Fourier computing with the incoming photons.
Fourier computer = lens. Analog computing at its finest.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2005, 10:08 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by janoskiss
Fourier computer = lens. Analog computing at its finest.
No it is far more complex that that.At the back focal plane of a good lens with coherent light,the Fourier transform exists.Filters can be put there to modulate
and deconvolute to obtain the desired information.Then another equally good lens to reconstruct the result.Yes a very quick analogue computer.I remember when an FFT took hours,now my laptop does it in milliseconds.Now people are too busy to see the beauty.

Bert
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2005, 10:25 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Bert, Fourier optics, and the associated analog image processing/computing, is a beautiful thing and it is performed at the speed of light, literally. And I do appreciate it very much; I believe it is one example of somewhat outside-the-square thinking that could help make unprecedented advances in the science of computing. (can you imagine? the optical co-processor )
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-12-2005, 10:37 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
I first put foward the idea to my boss P M C. that the human and any brain works at not only a Fourier level for storing information,but the brain was working at a quantum level for data processing.This was twenty years ago!
He said to me ,get the proof and test!I am still working on it.
I have done many experiments in Fourier processing and I am always astonished how well it works.Fourier did not even have a calculator,let alone a computer.What an achievment!And to think he was trying to understand heat flowing through a metal plate.He virtually predicted phonons that were quantised etc.I could go on.Sorry

Quote:
Originally Posted by janoskiss
Bert, Fourier optics, and the associated analog image processing/computing, is a beautiful thing and it is performed at the speed of light, literally. And I do appreciate it very much; I believe it is one example of somewhat outside-the-square thinking that could help make unprecedented advances in the science of computing. (can you imagine? the optical co-processor )

Last edited by avandonk; 03-12-2005 at 11:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-12-2005, 10:07 AM
33South's Avatar
33South (Chris)
Registered User

33South is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wentworth Falls NSW
Posts: 1,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by janoskiss
This is essentially what "our" imaging guys do when they use stacking software like registax, while picking the best frames to stack.
Im gonna need a faster puter, to process several million images with registax.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement