Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-02-2010, 06:45 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
NGC3242 Ghost of Jupiter-close up

Hi Guys

Late last night patchy clouds came in so I dumped the usual long exposure pain, and took this pic through sucker holes with short exposures. I only got 1 hr total in before shut down, at about 2am.

Its very small, but also bright, especially OIII, huge ADUs with just 2 min subs . I was suprised, I dont think ive ever got away with 2 min NB subs on anything !.

Anyway, this is 4 off 10min 3nm Ha subs, 6 off 2 min OIII and 2 off 5min SII (both 6 nm). Mapped as LRGB (hubble), all at bin 1 . SII was a joke, almost nothing.

I was lucky enough to find a bright enough guide star to fire up AO8 guiding at 2hz. The guide star was mag 10, 0.25sec exposures is unusual for this mag (I think), so the seeing must have been quite good, despite the full moon and bright clouds everywhere.

Guideing error was about 0.2 arc/secs RMS although the pk/pk could have been 1 arc/secs or more.

The Saturn neb is some 16 arc/secs in diameter, about 25 pixels at my image scale and FL(0.68 arc secs), so this image is VERY cropped, the raw subs were fairly blocky before processing, hence the focus doesnt look very flash at all .

Anyway, given the FOV it came out OK I think, AO saved my ass here from a even more blurry mess .

Also on my site at a slightly higher res.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC3242 Saturn neb NB sml .jpg)
113.3 KB138 views

Last edited by Bassnut; 27-02-2010 at 02:47 PM. Reason: Got the name wrong, its not "Saturn neb"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-02-2010, 07:05 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Haha! That's awesome! Extreme NB with narrowfield.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-02-2010, 07:07 PM
DavidU's Avatar
DavidU (Dave)
Like to learn

DavidU is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 4,835
LOL, how kewl Fred !!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-02-2010, 07:08 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Beautiful Fred. Given the trying conditions, a real winner. Suckerholes, schmukerholes - annoying aren't they? Well done
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-02-2010, 07:39 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Haha! That's awesome! Extreme NB with narrowfield.
Thanks Marc, well, exteme at a cost

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidU View Post
LOL, how kewl Fred !!!!
Thanks Dave

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaroo View Post
Beautiful Fred. Given the trying conditions, a real winner. Suckerholes, schmukerholes - annoying aren't they? Well done
Well, the sucker holes themselves were OK, its waiting for the buggers that sucks, and clouds make the sky sooo bright.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-02-2010, 07:45 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Nice one Fred.

I'm tempted to take the C11 out of mothballs and doing some imaging at >2800 FL.

Steven
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-02-2010, 07:58 PM
mill's Avatar
mill (Martin)
sword collector

mill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Evelyn
Posts: 2,925
Nice image Fred
It is a tiny little sucker isn't it?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-02-2010, 08:11 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
Nice one Fred.

I'm tempted to take the C11 out of mothballs and doing some imaging at >2800 FL.

Steven
Oh yeah, do it . I miss the 12" at 3m. 10" is a suprising increase in exposure time.

Its hard, but over 2m is well, differenter and more challenging and obviously betterer. Croping the hell out of pokey refractor pics is well, marginal, and way too much harderer, even on an AP
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-02-2010, 09:28 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by mill View Post
Nice image Fred
It is a tiny little sucker isn't it?
Yes it is, bloody small, 4m FL would be nice (well, and 14-20")
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-02-2010, 03:19 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Oh yeah, do it . I miss the 12" at 3m. 10" is a suprising increase in exposure time.

Its hard, but over 2m is well, differenter and more challenging and obviously betterer. Croping the hell out of pokey refractor pics is well, marginal, and way too much harderer, even on an AP
Very cool! Much more dedication shown when imaging long FL than cropping a widefield shot!

Bravo chap!!

Ps - put the 12" up on the PME, sell the 10" RCOS.. then your costs are not so extreme, and the results would be similar if not better given local sky conditions.... Just a thought..
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-02-2010, 01:01 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Very cool! Much more dedication shown when imaging long FL than cropping a widefield shot!

Bravo chap!!

Ps - put the 12" up on the PME, sell the 10" RCOS.. then your costs are not so extreme, and the results would be similar if not better given local sky conditions.... Just a thought..
Thanks Alex

Actually, im kidding, ive seen some very good close ups on refractors, and given the apature, must be much harder

Yes, ive considered putting the 12" up, but setting up everything again (image train adaptor hell, pointing map, FOV indicator, focus max etc) makes it just too hard on a whim, and the RCOS is soo stable.

The last time I tried the Meade, there was something very wrong with images (with the long image train, same as the RC plus a focuser, stupid long), havent worked that out yet, could be way past the back focus, whatever it is on an SCT, cant find out. Ive seen an image train that long on Astro anarcys site, but with a FR, seemed to be fine, although counter intuative (doesnt a FR reduce back focus?). Fitting the FR is more adaptor hell, its starting to get unwieldly and unstable (the ST10/filter is way heavier than a QHY).

mmm, come to think of it, I must ask Stuart how he does it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27-02-2010, 01:41 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
up close and personal..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27-02-2010, 02:20 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Very nice image Fred, great detail. I find this object quite fun to image - it's brightness and position in the sky are quite good.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 27-02-2010, 02:49 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Thanks Narayan, Roger.

Yes, the brightness makes it a pleasure to image.

I got the name wrong, its "Eye nebula", or "Ghost of Jupiter".
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 27-02-2010, 03:10 PM
trent_julie's Avatar
trent_julie
Registered User

trent_julie is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 581
Very nice indeed Fred.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 27-02-2010, 04:19 PM
telecasterguru's Avatar
telecasterguru (Frank)
Have scope will travel!

telecasterguru is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pitnacree NSW
Posts: 1,501
Fred,

You can see in the image what looks like the neb is starting to go middle elliptical with the bright rim starting to push out the halo at the bottom and the top.

Fantastic image.

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 27-02-2010, 04:56 PM
tonybarry's Avatar
tonybarry (Tony)
Registered User

tonybarry is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Penrith, Sydney
Posts: 558
I can only echo others' admiration. A great effort.

Regards,
Tony Barry
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 27-02-2010, 06:00 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Very nice image Fred showing the structure of this planetary well.

I hope to do this with my 14" SCT soon when I get the OAG working.

All the best.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 28-02-2010, 12:42 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,689
Hmmm?...at first I thought you had done the ol' looks like detail but is really just processing artifacts trick again ..but nup, comparing to Hubble shots I think the mottling in the halo is indeed (at least mostly) real , nice job.

Now I would like to see a crop of just the inner ring too please...and maybe the pointed ends of the inner oval, or.....oh sorry your field is already sooooo small you can't do that huh? DOH



Mike
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 28-02-2010, 01:02 AM
Waxing_Gibbous's Avatar
Waxing_Gibbous (Peter)
Grumpy Old Man-Child

Waxing_Gibbous is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Gippsland
Posts: 1,768
Beautiful!
I tried the same object only to realise I' dforgotten to put a card in the DC!
Images like this only re-inforce my opinion: "Leave it to the pros!"
Thanks for posting.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement