Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Terrestrial Photography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-02-2010, 11:15 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Lake Burley Griffin tonight

I walked straight through a giant Orb Weaver's web in the dark to get this tonight. Lake Burley Griffin from the Black Mountain shore.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_8461.JPG)
36.2 KB36 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-02-2010, 11:42 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Beautiful sunset.

I imagine the hues in the clouds would have extended well beyond zenith at the time. Because there's no foreground interest (no reflections or rocks or anything else), perhaps a composition with 1/3rd water and 2/3rd sky would have worked better.

H
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-02-2010, 12:22 AM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
Beautiful sunset.

I imagine the hues in the clouds would have extended well beyond zenith at the time. Because there's no foreground interest (no reflections or rocks or anything else), perhaps a composition with 1/3rd water and 2/3rd sky would have worked better.

H
So more like this one?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_8462 (Medium).JPG)
36.7 KB22 views
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-02-2010, 12:51 AM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Much better, Baz.

We've been having some amazing sunsets recently. There were two absolute corkers last week. I'll have to keep it in mind, late January/early February for beautiful Canberran sunsets. Is there a lake out at Jerrabomberra? For some reason I remember reading somewhere that you can capture nice sunsets on the lake out there...

H

Last edited by Octane; 02-02-2010 at 08:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-02-2010, 07:33 AM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
I was going to suggest the same thing as H. Looked like there's more interest in the sky than water. Well done. Lovely colours.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-02-2010, 09:38 AM
Liz's Avatar
Liz
Registered User

Liz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beautiful SE Tassie
Posts: 4,734
Both beautiful pics Baz, but 2nd is the better
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-02-2010, 06:06 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Bless ya cobbers!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-02-2010, 11:58 AM
lacad01's Avatar
lacad01 (Adam)
The sky is Messier here!

lacad01 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Darwin
Posts: 2,587
Nice one Baz, certainly pic #2 hits the spot
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-02-2010, 06:09 PM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
I couldn't help but come back to these shots. Sorry mate.

It appears as though you're trying to use the rule of thirds, but may be erring on the border side of the third points, rather than towards the middle. Take #1 above - the sky appears to be a thin sliver along the top, slightly less than 1/3.

Have a look at this link: http://photoinf.com/Golden_Mean/Euge...enSection.html

See the giraffe pic. Don't get too caught up in actual dimensions, or things being exactly equal thirds. I think just around third points, but slightly towards the middle.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-02-2010, 06:22 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Ah yes, I see now. Thanks Troy. The golden triangle is an interesting concept too! Hmmmm...lots of thinking going on around these here parts now...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-02-2010, 06:39 PM
Lumen Miner's Avatar
Lumen Miner (Mitchell)
Registered User

Lumen Miner is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beecroft, Sydney
Posts: 825
I'm going to go out on a limb and dis-agree with others here. Out of the two crops I prefer the first. The second looks like a sightly dramatic version of a stock-standard sunset.

IMHO I believe the strongest point to this shot is the unique colours present in the water. The reason I don't not like the seconds crop is because you loose that lovely gradient there.

I agree that you need more of the sky to appreciate the gradient / colours there yet not at the degredation of the lovely gradient below. I believe the water gradient is stronger than the skies.

In the second image the top third of the sky is not strong. I would crop, 1/3 off the top of the second and 1/3 of the bottom of the first shot.
The image I would like to see is right in the middle of those two, which would include both the skies strong points and the water.

I stick by my opinion and believe number 1 has stronger elements.
Just MHO though, take it as you will.

Great shots mate!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement