Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-01-2010, 11:02 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Smile QHY9 First light

Over Christmas & New Year I thought I'd start a spreadsheet comparing various CCD specs, advantages/disadvantages, price, size, weight, pixel count, FOV, etc. Just in case I ever seriously considered going to the "dark side" from my trusty 450D.....

WARNING! - starting such a spreadsheet can be hazardous to your bank account!

It wasn't until I did the exercise that I realised how close the KAF8300 chips are to APS-C chips in pixel size and FOV, and why there is such interest in the newer SBIGS, QHYs, etc. After seeing some the very competitive prices on offer at the moment an idea started to form in my mind - just how much could I afford, and how important to me was my imaging?....

Anyway, the QHY9 + filterwheel and LRGB filters for $3000 before March 2010 was too nice to pass up. I was lucky enough to snare a camera in Theo's last delivery, so a week later I found myself the owner of a new QHY9 and trying to figure out what the heck "Gain and offset" are.

With help from Robin and Alex (and faultless and rapid support from Theo) I had learned enough to attempt my first shots on Saturday at Peter's (10 Chain Hill observatory outside Brisbane).

I'm still in the process of collecting suitable bias and dark frames, let alone figuring out what software to use for stacking etc, so I haven't processed much of the 4 or 5 objects I attempted. However, I did want to share my "first light" rite-of-passage on M42 and a more serious attempt on the Leo triplet, so here they are.

I'm looking forward to everything I'll need to figure out now to climb the LRGB mountain, but very happy with the initial sensitivity and resolution these pics offer.


1. M42/Running man (first pic taken) 1 x 30 secs, no cal, Gain 50, offset 100
2. Leo triplet, 3 x 5mins, no cal, Gain 40, offset 100

All pics mono (no filters), QHY9 + MPCC on 8 inch newt:

QHY9 pics


Also for comparison, a 30min stack of calibrated 3min images of the Leo triplet taken with 450D March last year - albeit with moderate noise reduction to help wash out light polution (no pollution filter used) and much less processing knowledge at the time:
http://picasaweb.google.com/UserRobF...41677845469922
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-01-2010, 11:26 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Very nice start Rob. You should have a bit of fun with the camera. I do like the Leo triplet image, it has come up very nicely for such short exposures and only 3.

The only thing I would sugest is that you go to Craig Starks web site and read his directions on setting the gain and offset for any camera. After reading his explanation you may want to reduce the Gain figure a little bit.

Taken from the Nebulosity owners manual, but it is relevant for whichever software you use. Bare in mind the well depth of the QHY9 is 25.5Ke.


How to set Gain and Offset then forget it.
The best value for your camera may not be the best value for other cameras. In particular,
different makers set things up differently. For example, on a Meade DSI III that I recently tested,
running the gain full-out at 100% let it just hit full well at 65,535 ADU. Running below 100%
and it hit full-well at 40,000 or 30,000, or 10,000 ADU. There's no point in running this camera
at anything less than 100% gain. On a CCD Labs Q8-HR I have, even at gains of 0 and 1 (on its
0-63 scale), the camera would hit 65535 on bright objects (like the ceiling above my desk).
There's no point in running this camera at gains higher than 0 or 1.
Why is there no point? The camera only holds 25k e-. If a gain of 0 or 1 gets me to 0.38 e-/ADU
(so that those 25k e- become 65535), running at 0.1 e-/ADU will only serve to limit my dynamic
range. Each single electron already comes out to more than 2 ADU.
So, to determine the gain and offset to use:
1) Take a bias frame and look for the minimum value in it. Is it at least, say 100 and less than a
thousand or a few thousand? If so, your offset is fine. If it's too low, boost the offset. If it's high,
drop it. Repeat until you have a bias frame with an offset in, roughly 100 - 1000. Don't worry
about precision here as it won't matter at all in the end. You now know your offset. Set it and
forget it. Never change it.
2) Aim the camera at something bright or just put it on your desk with no lens or lenscap on and
take a picture. Look at the max value in the image. Is it well below 65k? If so, boost the gain. Is
it at 65k? If so drop the gain. Now, if you're on a real target (daylight ones are great for this) you
can look at the histogram and see the bunching up at the top end as the camera is hitting fullwell.
Having that bunch-up roughly at 65,535 plus or minus a bit is where you want to be. If you
pull up just shy, you'll get the "most out of your chip" but you'll also have non-linearity up there.
You've got more of a chance of having odd color casts on saturated areas, for example, as a
result. If you let that just clip off, you've lost a touch but what you've lost is very non-linear data
anyway (all this assumes, BTW, an ABG chip which all of these cams in question are). Record
that gain and set it and forget it. Never change it.
By doing this simple, daytime, two-step process you've set things up perfectly. You'll be sure to
never hit the evil of zero and you'll be making your chip's dynamic range fit best into the 16-bits
of your ADC. Again, all the cameras in question have full-well capacities below 65,535 so you
are sure to have enough ADUs to fit every electron you record into its own intensity value.

Good luck with it all and have fun. Very nice start.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-01-2010, 12:38 AM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
I like the triplets and only 3 shots ... not bad is it. Bugger about the wheel.

Can you run zero gain? As I said in pm, you will lose star colour if you bump it up.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-01-2010, 01:43 PM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Rob, your gain setting seems very high. I used the method Doug posted here to set offset and gain on my QHY 9 and came up with gain = 15%, offset = 102. It seems to work for my camera without clipping the data so it might be worth giving it a try. My bias frame has min of 120 ADU and a max of 435 ADU. With the camera pointed straight into a light the max is 65 530 ADU.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-01-2010, 01:52 PM
richardo's Avatar
richardo (Rich)
Love reflection Nebs !

richardo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Streaky Bay
Posts: 1,070
Well done Rob on your first light with your new investment!
Looks as though you'll get things nailed pretty quickly I'd say

Yeah, I've had a setback money wise with any new ccd purchase, but I keep looking around anyway!
Although the ST8300 looks to me like a great choice, however the value for money that you have with your purchase even beats this.

I'll be looking for more images from you in the future.
Have lots of fun!

Rich
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-01-2010, 04:20 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Good stuff Rob.. That Leo trio was hard to frame right, but it's come out nicely mate! Well done indeed...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-01-2010, 09:07 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar View Post
Very nice start Rob. You should have a bit of fun with the camera. I do like the Leo triplet image, it has come up very nicely for such short exposures and only 3.

The only thing I would sugest is that you go to Craig Starks web site and read his directions on setting the gain and offset for any camera. After reading his explanation you may want to reduce the Gain figure a little bit.

Good luck with it all and have fun. Very nice start.
Thanks Doug - very handy reference. I had struggled to figure out how bright the surface should be for determining max gain. I'm sure to give it another go. Theo has already recommended I rein in my Gain too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tandum View Post
I like the triplets and only 3 shots ... not bad is it. Bugger about the wheel.

Can you run zero gain? As I said in pm, you will lose star colour if you bump it up.
Yeah - I think I'm going to have to come back a long way Robin - you were right. I spent some time on the phone with Theo Sun night troubleshooting my sticking filterwheel, and here it is Tue and I have a brand new one sitting here on my desk.

Good support feedback I've heard here was definitely a big reason I was happy to go QHY.

Quote:
Originally Posted by marki View Post
Rob, your gain setting seems very high. I used the method Doug posted here to set offset and gain on my QHY 9 and came up with gain = 15%, offset = 102. It seems to work for my camera without clipping the data so it might be worth giving it a try. My bias frame has min of 120 ADU and a max of 435 ADU. With the camera pointed straight into a light the max is 65 530 ADU.

Mark
Thanks Mark - I was a little surprised how difficult it was to find recommended starting values via Google. Should have just posted here of course..!

Quote:
Originally Posted by richardo View Post
Well done Rob on your first light with your new investment!
Looks as though you'll get things nailed pretty quickly I'd say

Yeah, I've had a setback money wise with any new ccd purchase, but I keep looking around anyway!
Although the ST8300 looks to me like a great choice, however the value for money that you have with your purchase even beats this.

I'll be looking for more images from you in the future.
Have lots of fun!

Rich
Thanks Rich. I've certainly got plenty to learn, but that's half the fun. Wow - impressive website you have there! Weight was another major issue for me. I really couldn't afford another 3-400 grams for the heavy duty quality SBIG is renowned for with my mount and focuser even if I did have the dollars. I'm hoping the QHY9+FW behaves on my setup.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Good stuff Rob.. That Leo trio was hard to frame right, but it's come out nicely mate! Well done indeed...
Thanks for your help Alex. I was surprised how much detail I could see in the end. A thoroughly enjoyable first light!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-01-2010, 09:20 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Seems we both thoroughly enjoyed our first lights on Saturday mate.. I really wanted to attack some galaxies but once I got enough Lum data on Eta I figured I may as well finish it off with a little colour... Next time hey...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-01-2010, 09:39 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
I ran off a decent set of bias and darks for the 40% and 50% gain settings I tried that night, so I'll have to get stuck into the horsehead and crab too now, as well as calibrating the Leo T effort.

All fingers and toes crossed for this Sat
Even though I don't have MPCC to Filterwheel adaptors, may not be necessary for the colour R,G,B exposures, as long as the L is shot manually attached to MPCC?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-01-2010, 09:48 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
shouldnt matter much Rob... The only thing you will want to make sure of is that your camera angle is as close as possible to the same.. coma will warp the look of the stars and make it hard to align the colour to the Lum..

Have you looked into the adapter required any further? Have any thoughts on how you are going to do it?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-01-2010, 10:05 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Turns out MyAstro Shop sells male M54 to female M42 - I just didn't look hard enough. I'm not sure how soon I can get one yet - expecting the worst....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-01-2010, 10:10 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
I sent Steve Massey an e-mail a few days ago asking about a few things, he's not replied yet so I'm assuming he's on holidays still..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 13-01-2010, 11:32 AM
marki's Avatar
marki
Waiting for next electron

marki is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF View Post
Turns out MyAstro Shop sells male M54 to female M42 - I just didn't look hard enough. I'm not sure how soon I can get one yet - expecting the worst....
I got the last one from Steve about a week ago and although they fit into the filter wheel nicely it causes a lot of vignetting. May just be my combo though.

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 13-01-2010, 12:35 PM
mill's Avatar
mill (Martin)
sword collector

mill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Evelyn
Posts: 2,925
Very nice first light

Still waiting for my QHY9, Maybe in 2 weeks
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 13-01-2010, 07:28 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by marki View Post
I got the last one from Steve about a week ago and although they fit into the filter wheel nicely it causes a lot of vignetting. May just be my combo though.

Mark
Hmm - that's what Steve just said too Mark!
Looks like I'll be waiting a while to see if I get any vignetting....

Quote:
Originally Posted by mill View Post
Very nice first light

Still waiting for my QHY9, Maybe in 2 weeks
Thanks Martin - will look forward to hearing your experiences too.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 13-01-2010, 08:05 PM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF View Post
Hmm - that's what Steve just said too Mark!
Looks like I'll be waiting a while to see if I get any vignetting....



Thanks Martin - will look forward to hearing your experiences too.
That's pretty impressive Rob. I'm envious. I'm going to have a run at the Leo Triplet tonight - after a couple of hours on the Cone - the QHY8 on the back of the ED127 - should be a good combo. I have just installed a new 100mm Orion F6 guider as well so all being well, I ought to get some competitive results.

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 13-01-2010, 08:41 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmrid View Post
That's pretty impressive Rob. I'm envious. I'm going to have a run at the Leo Triplet tonight - after a couple of hours on the Cone - the QHY8 on the back of the ED127 - should be a good combo. I have just installed a new 100mm Orion F6 guider as well so all being well, I ought to get some competitive results.

Peter
Thanks Peter. You're certainly assembling some formidable gear at 10 Chain. With your skies there's nothing holding you back now!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement