ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Last Quarter 37%
|
|

05-01-2010, 12:01 AM
|
 |
Barb and David
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
|
|
M42 - Different Exposures Blended (added new trap repro)
This is a combination of four different single exposures blended together in PS.
Having a few guiding problems for some strange reason ATM hope to sort it out and get back to longer exposures again ASAP
Details
1x8min 1x4min 1x2min 1x25sec ISO 800
Canon 40D unmodded
Celestron C9.25 using 6.3 Focal reducer
Larger image http://www.pbase.com/rangeviewobserv...73522/original
An added repro with the dark trap area revealed as suggested by Mr Sidonio
Thanks Mike
A larger size of both images can be compared here http://www.pbase.com/rangeviewobservatory/nebulae
Last edited by Tamtarn; 06-01-2010 at 11:38 PM.
Reason: 2nd image added
|

05-01-2010, 12:34 AM
|
 |
Widefield wuss
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
|
|
Considering its only 1 exposure of each different duration, that is exceptionally impressive.. fantastic sharpness and tons of detail..
well done guys!
|

05-01-2010, 12:59 AM
|
 |
Barb and David
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN
Considering its only 1 exposure of each different duration, that is exceptionally impressive.. fantastic sharpness and tons of detail..
well done guys! 
|
Appreciate your comments Alex.
By the way congrats on your new camera. Looks a beauty  Look forward to your first light image
B & D
|

05-01-2010, 01:35 AM
|
 |
Star Struck
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
|
|
Very nice indeed guys. An exceptional amount of detail for such a small amount of data.
Hopefully you guys will tackle M42 again collecting more data.
|

05-01-2010, 01:40 AM
|
 |
Support your local RFS
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
|
|
Lovely image, lots of detail and natural looking colour.
|

05-01-2010, 07:42 AM
|
 |
Star-Fishing
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tuckurimba
Posts: 885
|
|
Theres a lot to like with this effort Barb & Dave. I really like the greys that appear. It looks like non astro cameras are more sensitive to it, my 40D does the same. Many of the other M42's around taken with astro cameras show some light grey but it seems nothing like their counterparts.
Lots of detail for such little exposure time too, it sure is a bright object.
Thanks for showing us.
|

05-01-2010, 01:05 PM
|
 |
Barb and David
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty P
Very nice indeed guys. An exceptional amount of detail for such a small amount of data. 
Hopefully you guys will tackle M42 again collecting more data.

|
Thanks Matt. We were surprised at the detail with minimal data. Had our session cut short that night hence the small amount of subs. Hope to get out again soon for lots more longer exposures.
|

05-01-2010, 06:20 PM
|
 |
Barb and David
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric
Lovely image, lots of detail and natural looking colour.
|
Thanks Ric
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffkop
Theres a lot to like with this effort Barb & Dave. I really like the greys that appear. It looks like non astro cameras are more sensitive to it, my 40D does the same. Many of the other M42's around taken with astro cameras show some light grey but it seems nothing like their counterparts.
Lots of detail for such little exposure time too, it sure is a bright object.
Thanks for showing us.
|
The 40D does do a great job Jeff. We're happy with ours. Like to try a CCD but we think it would be too complicated for us to get our heads around
|

05-01-2010, 08:13 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,223
|
|
Not too bad guys! 
Did you guys have an image published recentley also?
|

05-01-2010, 10:56 PM
|
 |
Mostly harmless...
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
|
|
Impeccable processing as always Barbara and David. Lovely image.
I'm sure you could start giving processing classes for a fee! (Perhaps the next IIS star party!?  )
|

05-01-2010, 11:04 PM
|
 |
Highest Observatory in Oz
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,657
|
|
Yep, pretty nice guys and a very good return from not much investment
I do think though that the trap area is quite obviously darkend so looks a bit like we are looking at it through an unnatural looking hole in the nebula, it's only subtle but if you could just rework that bit only, the dynamics of the image would be just a little more believable I think...?
Still a great looking image none the less
Mike
|

05-01-2010, 11:05 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
|
|
I just can't believe how well this has worked out considering it's only just single images.
Well done.
|

06-01-2010, 10:32 AM
|
 |
Barb and David
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDecepticon
Not too bad guys! 
Did you guys have an image published recentley also? 
|
Gray one image was published in AS&T Nov/Dec the other in Astronomy 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobF
Impeccable processing as always Barbara and David. Lovely image.
I'm sure you could start giving processing classes for a fee! (Perhaps the next IIS star party!?  )
|
|

06-01-2010, 11:51 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,223
|
|
Congrats, then! You're images have earned it!
|

07-01-2010, 12:00 AM
|
 |
Barb and David
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Yep, pretty nice guys and a very good return from not much investment
I do think though that the trap area is quite obviously darkend so looks a bit like we are looking at it through an unnatural looking hole in the nebula, it's only subtle but if you could just rework that bit only, the dynamics of the image would be just a little more believable I think...?
Still a great looking image none the less
Mike
|
Thanks for your constructive thoughts Mike. 
I hadn't purposely darkened that area. Having checked a hubble image and a few others some seemed to leave it dark so I left ours that way.
After your suggestion I realised that there was a lot of detail hidden away around the dark core so I did a repro selecting just that small area.
There's more detail there hope it looks better
(New image at beginning of thread)
Last edited by Tamtarn; 07-01-2010 at 12:27 AM.
|

07-01-2010, 12:22 AM
|
 |
Canon collector
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Taylors Lakes Melb
Posts: 1,965
|
|
Very nice with plenty of detail especially for only a few shots. Nice work with the blending too. I have also been playng around with blending some M42's in PS and am findig that core a little tricky to get perfect.
Great work guys
Cheers daniel.
|

07-01-2010, 05:06 PM
|
 |
Barb and David
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar
I just can't believe how well this has worked out considering it's only just single images.
Well done.
|
Thanks Doug. This session was cut short so we only ended up with a couple of long exposures so we were lucky it came out so well.
Hope to get longer subs this new moon
Quote:
Originally Posted by danielsun
Very nice with plenty of detail especially for only a few shots. Nice work with the blending too. I have also been playng around with blending some M42's in PS and am findig that core a little tricky to get perfect.
Great work guys
Cheers daniel.
|
Thanks for commenting Daniel
It's good to try different ways to blend the different length exposures. You just have to keep giving it more time and eventually something clicks.
I can't count the hours I spent trying to get this one just right So keep at it!
Barb
|

07-01-2010, 05:54 PM
|
 |
sword collector
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Evelyn
Posts: 2,925
|
|
Second image looks top notch and the core is very good.
For single exposure images this is very very good
|

08-01-2010, 03:59 PM
|
 |
Highest Observatory in Oz
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,657
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamtarn
Thanks for your constructive thoughts Mike. 
I hadn't purposely darkened that area. Having checked a hubble image and a few others some seemed to leave it dark so I left ours that way.
After your suggestion I realised that there was a lot of detail hidden away around the dark core so I did a repro selecting just that small area.
There's more detail there hope it looks better
(New image at beginning of thread)
|
I see, you have managed to reveal the inside of the dark bay (as I call it) nice! I ws refering though to the area around the trap as a whole. There are lots of interpretations for sure but the usual problem I see with this area in most M42 shots is that it looks unanaturally darker than the bright surrounds and the transition to this darkened area is too abrupt. It is very tricky to get right I recon but the Trap area is the brightest part of the whole nebula so it should really remain so to look natural. The trick is to gradually blend the darkened trap area into the surrounding bright areas so that it is showing plenty of detail but remains bright, just my opinion of course
Over all it is a very pleasing result and you must be quite happy with it. I really like how you have revealed stuff inside that dark bay section and the coliurs look good too, nice!
MIke
|

09-01-2010, 09:23 AM
|
 |
Barb and David
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mill
Second image looks top notch and the core is very good.
For single exposure images this is very very good 
|
Thanks Martin after acting on Mike's suggestion we're really happy with it
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
I see, you have managed to reveal the inside of the dark bay (as I call it) nice! I ws refering though to the area around the trap as a whole. There are lots of interpretations for sure but the usual problem I see with this area in most M42 shots is that it looks unanaturally darker than the bright surrounds and the transition to this darkened area is too abrupt. It is very tricky to get right I recon but the Trap area is the brightest part of the whole nebula so it should really remain so to look natural. The trick is to gradually blend the darkened trap area into the surrounding bright areas so that it is showing plenty of detail but remains bright, just my opinion of course
Over all it is a very pleasing result and you must be quite happy with it. I really like how you have revealed stuff inside that dark bay section and the coliurs look good too, nice!
MIke
|
Ahaaaa now I see what you mean Mike. I thought you were speaking about the dark bay
I understand your explanation now  You're right the trap is the brightest part of the nebula and most images as you say portray it unnaturally darker including ours.
I will try to highlight the trap and keep the detail if possible.
Thanks again for your thoughts it certainly helped me see things differently 
Barb
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:59 AM.
|
|