Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-12-2009, 11:23 PM
CoolhandJo's Avatar
CoolhandJo (Paul)
Registered User

CoolhandJo is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,816
Plieades - but this time with a DSLR

Hi, a few days ago I posted a shot I took of the Plieades here -> Pleiades .

Well I thought I might try to get some more nebulosity through my Cannon 350D (Modded). Took 8 x 6min subs ICNR on, took flats - all through the ED80 and guided. Hutech LPS-2 also.

BUT - still not too much joy!

Starting to think the Light Pollution at that low location in the sky is causing the issue.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ISS-Plieades-final-with-fla.jpg)
176.2 KB106 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-12-2009, 09:08 AM
Tilt's Avatar
Tilt (Michael)
Registered User

Tilt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Emerald, QLD
Posts: 564
Still a reasonable effort

Not sure, but would it be better to go for 600sec subs and more of them?

Michael
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-12-2009, 10:04 AM
toryglen-boy's Avatar
toryglen-boy (Duncan)
Scotland to Australia

toryglen-boy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilt View Post
Still a reasonable effort

Not sure, but would it be better to go for 600sec subs and more of them?

Michael

Yeah, i dont really go under 10 mins now, but thats only with the QHY8, i can get 10 mins with the 1000D, but only in the very depths of winter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-12-2009, 10:07 AM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
I'm sure you could coax a little more out of your image using levels. Moving the centre slider to the left and the left hand slider to the right. Just a little bit at a time.
Can't wait to have a go at this one myself.
Thanks for posting.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-12-2009, 10:27 AM
CoolhandJo's Avatar
CoolhandJo (Paul)
Registered User

CoolhandJo is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,816
Thanks for feedback. JJ I will try and increase levels to see what happens. Michael/Duncan - I am mounted on a meade Lx200. I can get about 8min subs (so far). Anything more than that the random error gets in the way. But, point taken and will be pushing the subs out as much as I can during summer on these fainter objects thats for sure!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-12-2009, 10:59 AM
toryglen-boy's Avatar
toryglen-boy (Duncan)
Scotland to Australia

toryglen-boy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolhandJo View Post
Thanks for feedback. JJ I will try and increase levels to see what happens. Michael/Duncan - I am mounted on a meade Lx200. I can get about 8min subs (so far). Anything more than that the random error gets in the way. But, point taken and will be pushing the subs out as much as I can during summer on these fainter objects thats for sure!
I hear you, go for 8 mins then!

Seriously though, your images are of a good standard anyway

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-12-2009, 09:39 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Nice one Paul. Yeah M45 is a tough one. The neb comes out after a lot of sub stacking. Your moded DSLR won't do any better because they're reflection nebs not emission. I've tried these from dark skies too and even there you have to really push to get anything showing up around those bright stars. Then come the reflections.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-12-2009, 02:43 PM
CoolhandJo's Avatar
CoolhandJo (Paul)
Registered User

CoolhandJo is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,816
Thanks guys for the feedback. Marc, makes me feel a lot better knowing you have shared my difficulty also!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-12-2009, 03:32 PM
wasyoungonce's Avatar
wasyoungonce (Brendan)
Certified Village Idiot

wasyoungonce is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mexico city (Melb), Australia
Posts: 2,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolhandJo View Post
Hi, a few days ago I posted a shot I took of the Plieades here -> Pleiades .

Well I thought I might try to get some more nebulosity through my Cannon 350D (Modded). Took 8 x 6min subs ICNR on, took flats - all through the ED80 and guided. Hutech LPS-2 also.

BUT - still not too much joy!

Starting to think the Light Pollution at that low location in the sky is causing the issue.


Look that's ok..possibly needs more subs..and what ISO did you use?

I was mucking around with M45 last night & started on ISO400 @4 mins. I suspect if I got enough subs it'll be ok but with cloud rolling in I went to ISO800 (can 450D std) with ED80...only 4 shots before the dreaded cloud.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M45 more processing very small 3 .jpg)
145.0 KB37 views
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-12-2009, 04:13 PM
CoolhandJo's Avatar
CoolhandJo (Paul)
Registered User

CoolhandJo is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,816
Looks like you started to get some nebulosity! I took mine at ISO 800. Are you saying that ISO 400 would be better?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-12-2009, 04:44 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Hey Paul there is nothing wrong with that mate, DSLR's work a bit different, and you are dead right, the dame thing is just to low, and we, well at least me cope all that low light haze.

Other than that it is afine image indeed.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-12-2009, 05:48 PM
wasyoungonce's Avatar
wasyoungonce (Brendan)
Certified Village Idiot

wasyoungonce is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mexico city (Melb), Australia
Posts: 2,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoolhandJo View Post
Looks like you started to get some nebulosity! I took mine at ISO 800. Are you saying that ISO 400 would be better?

ISO800 would be better if you take less subs or shorter subs...it'll be more sensitive but have more noise. Aka ISO800 for less bright objects. I started last night at ISO400 but went to ISO800 as I saw the clouds rolling in and wanted to get some result!

I suspect ISO400 would be ok (for M45) if you had lots of subs...20-30+ and longer exposures lets say 5 mins each.

INCR is a bit of a pain doing subtraction after each sub...better to make your own darks. Last night I did my darks waiting for the clouds to go...they never did...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement