Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 30-11-2009, 06:05 PM
Enchilada
Enhanced Astronomer

Enchilada is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 753
Do You Understand Magnification?

I've come across this interesting article on arvix entitled;

"Is Magnification Consistent? Why people from amateur astronomers to science's worst enemy have some basic physics wrong, and why."

Written by Christopher M. Graney, who is a physics teacher,it is an informative and interesting paper.

What is it interesting about this paper it discusses how telescopic magnification works and talks on the misconceptions in how telescopes magnify.

I also like the concluding quote;
"The question of correct understanding of the phenomenon of magnification, something that is easily accessible to students and that has practical application to the “real world” of familiar optical devices, has had a real impact beyond just the world of physicists. Misunderstanding this bit of basic science helped produce broad misunderstanding of science in general. Now there’s a story to tell your students when they complain about your insisting they get the details right in your class! After all, you wouldn’t want one of them to someday become the newest “worst enemy of science” based on a misunderstanding of basic physics."
Link; http://au.arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0911/0911.4757.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-11-2009, 07:22 PM
Robh's Avatar
Robh (Rob)
Registered User

Robh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 1,338
Enchilada, very interesting and informative.
I always wondered why brighter stars appeared larger.
Thanks for posting.

Regards, Rob
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-12-2009, 02:32 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,107
Yes, very good article. I will send it to my daughter who is science teacher, just in case :-)
It reminded me of many nights spend by a telescope and explaining this very issue to public... and being annoyed by that ubiquitous question "how much this telescope magnifies" :-).. and then my attempts to point out to them that the light gathering is what really counts and not the magnification..
I am pretty sure that at least I did not add to those common misconceptions.. too much :-)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2009, 04:33 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,800
Please Explain.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-12-2009, 04:53 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is online now
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
Please Explain.

Leon
For DSO of course
And for resolution... small aperture = low resolution & low light gathering capability.
Once we have aperture, magnification starts to make sense.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement