Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-09-2009, 01:37 AM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,898
M16 Eagle - 9.5 hours at F10

I'm trying my hand now at ISO 400 imaging (I usually use ISO 800). To preserve image fidelity I've done a few things differently:

1. Each day I shot at the same duration and create match dark to maintain temperatures
2. I try and frame the shot very carefully from the day I shot's starting position
3. I try and avoid longer duration shots when the moon is about

So the following is the fruit of my labour. With flats, flat darks and bias shots remove - this image is 30 shots totally 9 hours 25 minute of data on a C9.25 into a Canon 400D. The stacking is done in DSS and CS4 was used for levels and curves (and a very slight Gaussian blur on the dim region). I have combined 4 shots at 600 secs, 11 shots at 900 secs,
9 shots at 1200 secs and 6 shots at 1800 seconds).

I think my quality of shots is slowly creeping up!

Matt

PS

Thanks to Humayun for the image capture and processing suggestions! I've got a long way to go - but step by step I'm moving forward.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Eagle M16 9 hours 25 mins 30 frames v01 small.jpg)
173.8 KB256 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-09-2009, 07:00 AM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Another WOW image. Such detail on the actual Pillars. Lovely!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2009, 07:34 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Slowly? Nope, racing away Matt.
Very nice, very nice indeed, and at f10 as well.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-09-2009, 01:04 PM
David Fitz-Henr's Avatar
David Fitz-Henr
Registered User

David Fitz-Henr is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bowen Mountain
Posts: 837
Great shot Matt, nice colour and good detail in the pillars !

One question - I have started imaging with a Canon 400D as well, and was wondering if there is any difference in what ISO setting that you use ? That can all be done later in the image processing, right ? Or do you get a better dynamic range by choosing the optimal ISO for the image in the first place ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-09-2009, 01:44 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,425
well done nice shot. persistance does reap the rewards
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-09-2009, 02:47 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,898
David,

I read a few Canon reviews for the 400D model and for astro folk were suggesting ISO 800 as the sweet spot. I did that for a year - improving focus, pointing and guided tracking particularly. Once I could do longer duration subs reliabily I asked folk with alot more skill than I and Humayun in particular suggested I go with ISO 400 shots.

One key thing I've just noticed in my darks is that at ISO 400 there is significantly less noise at 10, 20 and 30 minutes shots. In my equivalent darks at ISO 800 there was real noise past 15 minutes. Now noise can't be perfectly subtracted - so I think I'll stay with the lower gain of ISO 400 on my longer shots.

Hope this suggestion helps. It boils down to if your darks are truely dark at the duration shot you wish, and you're still getting plenty of signal - then you should be laughing with ISO 400. Try it and see.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-09-2009, 07:25 AM
David Fitz-Henr's Avatar
David Fitz-Henr
Registered User

David Fitz-Henr is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bowen Mountain
Posts: 837
Quote:
Originally Posted by g__day View Post
David,

Hope this suggestion helps. It boils down to if your darks are truely dark at the duration shot you wish, and you're still getting plenty of signal - then you should be laughing with ISO 400. Try it and see.

Matt
Thanks Matt,
I have been doing all my work at ISO 200 (just posted another three shots from Friday night), and was going to try ISO400 last night but smoke clouds from bushfire preventative backburning ruined what would have been a nice night - that and a massive dose of hayfever ! I may try it tonight if the smoke blows away (looking not too bad this morning).
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13-09-2009, 10:52 AM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Good details on the pillars, colours look a bit too magenta to my eyes, but other than that, well done.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13-09-2009, 11:26 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,277
OK fundamentally it's a nice image but I don't believe anything was gained by capturing 9.5 hrs of data at varying exposures especially for this wide angle view.

Others will probably disagree but it's just my opinion
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13-09-2009, 12:45 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,898
Trevor,

Actually I think your dead right with that view - I was just experimenting. I think if you are not dealing with a high dynamic range target (e.g M42 Orion) then fixed duration shots should simplify your processing.

So I am shooting the Helix at 30 minute subs. Must say the burn offs are annoyance - given how faint the target is. Why they couldn't do this during the full moon or whilst there was alot of cloud cover puzzles me. First dark nights, otherwise clear skies they have to schedule their flame on skills!

Just bad luck huh?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 13-09-2009, 04:14 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Very nice Matt, exposure time is the biggest improvement most of us can make and with 9.5 hrs you have the final result to prove it.

Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22-09-2009, 11:11 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Matt,

Getting there, dude.

I'd still recommend just sticking to the one exposure time. Your tracking is phenomenal, but, beware, you have to compromise the exposure duration with the hideous amounts of noise the camera is going to generate after copious length exposures.

Colour balance is something that can be worked on easily after the fact. But, you must fix your framing!

Regards,
Humayun
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement