Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 11-08-2009, 11:06 PM
Sarge's Avatar
Sarge (Rod)
Registered User

Sarge is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne, Vic
Posts: 465
Thumbs up Tele Vue 27mm Panoptic

WOW . Picked up my new 27 mm panotic today. Kept my fingers crossed as the skies cleared in Melbourne. It lived up to its reputation. What an eyepiece! Extremely clear, very little to no coma, beautiful backgrounds and LARGE. 2" barrel and weighing in at 450 g, it towers over all my 1.25" plossols. M7, M8, Lagoon neb, omega cen, jewel box and a host of others - never looked so good. It cost a lot, but I think I'll get more than my monies worth. A truely beautiful eyepiece.

One very happy gazer. This one definately gets many thumbs up.


Rod
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2009, 09:07 AM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
I think I'm headed down the same path. Testing a kindly loaned at the moment.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2009, 08:55 PM
coldspace's Avatar
coldspace
Registered User

coldspace is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 506
Rod nothing beats a top quality eyepiece. I have owned many chinese ones but once I could afford to get the Televues I have not looked back.
Its like comparing a old TV from the 70's to one of the new HD panels around now the difference is day and night. The amount of money I have spent n cheap eyepieces was false economy if you choose carefully a few top self ones are all you need.

My 35mm Panoptic always wows me and friends everytime for wide field.

My 13mm Nagler is excellent on globs.planets/moon.

i have just invested in 17mm Ethos and it arrived yesterday so can't wait to try out this weekend.

Good luck with your new 27mm if you care for them they will last a lifetime.

Regards Matt.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2009, 08:57 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
been cloudy here all night -trying to clean & collimate an old pair of binos - nothing but clouds where i am - good luck with the ep
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-08-2009, 08:20 PM
Matt Wastell's Avatar
Matt Wastell (Matt)
Look up, look good!

Matt Wastell is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,762
Hi Rod

I am glad to hear how happy you are with the new eyepiece - when I was in Sydney this week I picked one up from Bintel. I have been wanting one for ages!
What scope do you use?
I will be out tomorrow night to give it some air time - but I will also be imaging with my new DMK31 - new toys and not enough time!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-08-2009, 08:33 PM
leinad's Avatar
leinad (Dan)
Registered User

leinad is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 1,307
Top eyepiece. Ive only mainly used it on the Coronado PST, and the view is crisp and clear
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-08-2009, 08:47 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Yep, the 27mm is on my future purchase list! Testing went well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28-08-2009, 09:38 PM
Sarge's Avatar
Sarge (Rod)
Registered User

Sarge is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne, Vic
Posts: 465
The 27 mm Panoptic is my first 2" eyepiece. Size really makes a difference. The larger eyepiece together with the 68 deg AFOV makes this eyepiece stand out in any crowd. The problem now is which medium eyepieice to a get to complememt the TV. I'm thinking of a TV Nagler IV 17 mm which also comes in 2", which in my scope gives 88 mag, or maybe a TV Powermate x2 which will give me 112 mag with the 27 mm. The 17 mm is over $500 and the powermate under $400.

I'm gunna have to start saving real hard for either, but there is always Christmas and and lot of hints!! Love to get both.

But anyone thinking of purchasing an excellent quality low power, I strongly recommend the 27 Panopotic.

Rod.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29-08-2009, 10:28 AM
Gallifreyboy's Avatar
Gallifreyboy
Dr Who Nut

Gallifreyboy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Perth
Posts: 218
I recently picked up the 27 Panoptic and agree it is a lovely eyepiece. My medium power EP is the Pentax XW14, although it is only 1.25" its FOV is greater than your eye has, its optics are flawless to my eye and it it really is a treat to look through. I would recommend it to anybody.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29-08-2009, 12:44 PM
GrahamL's Avatar
GrahamL
pro lumen

GrahamL is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ballina
Posts: 3,265
Its a great eyepiece Rod very comfortable to use , and if eye relief
is something thats important to you, as peter suggests consider
the 14 xw ..imo.. great views and a very comfortable view that you almost fall into .
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 30-08-2009, 07:55 AM
Matt Wastell's Avatar
Matt Wastell (Matt)
Look up, look good!

Matt Wastell is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,762
Cool - I have made a good purchase based on the feedback - it missed a run last night but I will share my experience later in the week.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 30-08-2009, 09:51 AM
Tamtarn's Avatar
Tamtarn
Barb and David

Tamtarn is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Warragul. Victoria.
Posts: 2,293
It sure is a top eyepiece Rod . It was our first premium EP purchase to use with our 12" Dob. We can highly recommend the Nagler 17mm it has a super FOV in the 12" and used with a good filter the contrast and clarity observing nebulae is amazing

We also have a 10mm and 7mm Pentax XW but must say the 17mm is the favourite.

D&B
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 31-08-2009, 11:05 PM
MarkN
Registered User

MarkN is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wollongong NSW
Posts: 111
Well, it could be my eyes but I couldn't bring my 27 Pano to focus in a 10" Bintel Newt; nor can it achieve focus in a 12" LB without either an extension tube or a Paracorr.

Not knocking the EP. Sharp views and the moderate weight makes it a good choice if balance is an issue.

Mark.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement