Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-08-2009, 07:05 PM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,892
Triffid - M20 - two long (3600 sec) DSLR shots

I am not displeased with this - stacked two 3600 second shots and one 1200 second shot.

Matt
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Triffid Nebulae 8400 secs - better darks - smaller.jpg)
173.2 KB417 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-08-2009, 07:08 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,786
Wow - nice work Matt! Were these taken through the C9.25 at F10?

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-08-2009, 07:09 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,078
The data is truely excellent. Spot on focus and guiding. Just the processing IMO is a tad harsh. I like a softer touch. Top shot regardless. Looks like you've got PHD tamed now
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-08-2009, 07:16 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
Very nice indeed. For such long subs the guiding is spot on and some very nice details are showing.

Top stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-08-2009, 07:42 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Smile

Wow...2hr 20min....that's quite a set of exposures there

Lots of data and detail. Have to agree with Marc...probably a little hard on the processing but a very very good shot

Well done, Matt
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-08-2009, 08:35 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,462
Grasshopper...you need to move from CMOS to CCD.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-08-2009, 10:22 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
That is looking Very nice mate! Guiding looks fantastic! Seems you've got it all nailed! I look forward to another 5~6 subs of that duration!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-08-2009, 11:19 PM
Craig_L
Craig

Craig_L is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 558
Wow! 1 hour subs on a DSLR. That might be a record. Tracking obviously nailed.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-08-2009, 12:06 AM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
Very nice work, all the elements coming together with the challenging focal length and exposure times.....might be related to guide star acquisition but maybe the subject framing is a little off but well done.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-08-2009, 12:38 AM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,892
Thanks very much for your comments guys,

For interest I imaged this shot below by combining the last 3 nights - in total 11 shots mainly at 20, 30 or 60 minutes (and ensure I took plenty of darks at 1 hour yesterday) put together in DeepSkyStacker and leveled and streched in CS4.

I know my image manipulation has a long learning curve - but I am happy that for my level of gear I am starting to get good signal / noise ratio (relative to my light drenched location) and with a plain Canon 400D (through a Hutech LPS filter).

The guiding is up to where I am fairly happy with it.

Yes Dennis - it's a C9.25 at F10

Peter - I wish - once I've saved up some pennies - that my next wish list item - then I have to work out which CCD best matches my OTA. So for the remainder of this year I'll practice image processing - then I'll graduate to CCD once the Bank balance looks healthier!

So here is a 11 shots comprise around 7 hours of data over three nights.

Beren

Yes the framing was a tad wrong - I only realign every couple of months - its been switch on, issue a goto and 2 minutes later I am imaging. I didn't expect the data and tracking to be that good - was more of an experiment, otherwise I would have nailed the framing and taken some shorter shots, layered it so that the core two / three stars wasn't blown out.

Matt
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Trifid 27930 secs v05 smaller.jpg)
182.8 KB271 views
Click for full-size image (Triffid M20 7 hrs 20 mins 11 frames v01 small.jpg)
169.2 KB7 views
Click for full-size image (Triffid M20 6 hrs 41 mins 12 frames v01 small.jpg)
188.0 KB7 views

Last edited by g__day; 27-08-2009 at 01:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 20-08-2009, 01:39 AM
Jen's Avatar
Jen
Moving to Pandora

Jen is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Swan Hill
Posts: 7,102
nice work Matt keep em coming
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20-08-2009, 09:50 AM
marc4darkskies's Avatar
marc4darkskies (Marcus)
Billions and Billions ...

marc4darkskies is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Quialigo, NSW
Posts: 3,143
Very nice Matt - great detail!! A bit of black clipping going on perhaps??

Cheers, Marcus
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21-08-2009, 09:00 AM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
One hour canon subs with darks, I'm impressed but I think you have too much time on your hands
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 21-08-2009, 09:47 AM
g__day's Avatar
g__day (Matthew)
Tech Guru

g__day is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,892
Robin - too much time - don't tell my wife or my list of jobs will get bigger!

The darks (6 of them) I ran at 1pm when I shut everything else down and locked up my little home made astrolab. I figure just cause I'm sleepy it doesn't mean my gear has to rest. Whenever its cloudy I guess I can use the time to take darks of a specific duration and use Deep Sky Stacker to turn them into a master dark tif for that duration.

Marcus,

Again thanks - you're probably right - I'm only now getting to the point where I understand what back clipping is. My processing generally is

Stack, dark frame and flat field and colour balance (align left hand edges of all coulur channels) and up saturation (21%) - in DSS (also I move the luminance curve to coincide with the start of my histograms)
Strech in either MaximDL or CS4
On the really dim zone - clip a bit to remove the worst light pollution and/ or do a heavy Gaussian Blur with CS4
On the dim / mid zone - do a bit of unsharp masking
On the bright zone - minor edits in curves just so things are swamped
Finalise the relative brightness of different zones using a fancy curve in CS4
Shrink and post here if I think its good enough

I don't yet use layers in CS4 to more precisely target my filters and processing - so I'm at a really basic stage of learning. If in a year I could do half of what Jase and other manage in CS4 - I'd be delighted!

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 21-08-2009, 11:04 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,588
Very nice result Matthew.
You're guiding is terrific and as you say once you start to get a better grasp of processing the data you'll be turning out some stunners.

When I use DSS I basically save the stacked image straight away and don't use any of the DSS controls, I find them awkward to use.
I simply open the image in CS3 and go from there.

Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 21-08-2009, 12:48 PM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Very nice images Matt. Obviously you have not got any mirror flop in the SCT. Tracking is perfect.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement