Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 29-07-2009, 01:17 PM
Mike21's Avatar
Mike21 (Michael)
Registered User

Mike21 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 180
National Geographic - Space Debris as Shade

I've only ever bought two editions of NG. I bought this month's (July) because it has a long article on where the big boys are headed with the new generation of giant telescopes, the largest being 42 metres of scope. And in next month's (August) there is a brief introductory article on bizarre proposals to shoot millions of tons of reflective particles, such as sulfate, into space to provide shade and protection from global warming. Has anyone heard of this from sources other than NG? It'd sure put a quick end to astronomy.

Mike.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-07-2009, 09:27 PM
TJD's Avatar
TJD (Trevor)
ful time light collecter

TJD is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: perth
Posts: 325
I HEARD THE WORLDS GETTING COLDER i agree with that because we just had a freezing winter
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-07-2009, 12:55 PM
Mike21's Avatar
Mike21 (Michael)
Registered User

Mike21 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 180
I don't mean to be a smarty pants, but global warming doesn't necessarily mean everywhere will get hotter. It will mean the weather will get less predictable, more extreme (say colder in Perth), and that the average global temperature will rise. Some have mooted the point that increased amounts of global dust, due to human activity has already offset global warming with another phenominon coined Global Dimming.

Whatever the case, increases in atmospheric dust, whether intentional or as a by product of our activities will mean out pricey toys become less effective.

I only began the thread because I can't imagine National Geographic publishing tripe merely to boost sales. So I'm guessing that blasting sulfate particles into the upper atmopheres is a reasonably serious proposal.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-07-2009, 06:05 PM
TJD's Avatar
TJD (Trevor)
ful time light collecter

TJD is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: perth
Posts: 325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike21 View Post
I don't mean to be a smarty pants, but global warming doesn't necessarily mean everywhere will get hotter. It will mean the weather will get less predictable, more extreme (say colder in Perth), and that the average global temperature will rise. Some have mooted the point that increased amounts of global dust, due to human activity has already offset global warming with another phenominon coined Global Dimming.

Whatever the case, increases in atmospheric dust, whether intentional or as a by product of our activities will mean out pricey toys become less effective.

I only began the thread because I can't imagine National Geographic publishing tripe merely to boost sales. So I'm guessing that blasting sulfate particles into the upper atmopheres is a reasonably serious proposal.

Mike
that explains everything
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-07-2009, 06:59 PM
seanliddelow's Avatar
seanliddelow (Sean)
Astro-Addict

seanliddelow is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 633
perth is actually getting hotter
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31-07-2009, 07:22 PM
mozzie's Avatar
mozzie (Peter)
Registered User

mozzie is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: moonee beach
Posts: 2,179
it should be getting hotter thats what happens when the ice age finishes
mozzie
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement