Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Observational and Visual Astronomy
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 09-05-2009, 04:49 PM
Robh's Avatar
Robh (Rob)
Registered User

Robh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 1,338
Volunteers needed for naked-eye sample (Full Moon)

Hi all,

Something you can do out there under a Full Moon. The imagination runs wild here!
I'm hoping to get a sample of naked-eye limiting magnitudes using the constellation Crux. In a few weeks, I'm going to re-sample near New Moon.
If you would like to participate. Tonight, or over the next few nights, could you simply note the magnitude of the faintest star you can see (naked-eye) from the attached map. I haven't shown all stars to magnitude 6. Somewhere between 7pm and midnight will be fine.

Then report two things back to this thread.
a) limiting magnitude b) whether it was an inner city, inner suburban, outer suburban or rural reading.

Thanks, Rob.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Crux Vmag.jpg)
23.1 KB52 views

Last edited by Robh; 09-05-2009 at 10:56 PM. Reason: Correction mu Cru 4.0
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-05-2009, 05:03 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,437
I'll have a go.

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-05-2009, 07:40 PM
Robh's Avatar
Robh (Rob)
Registered User

Robh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 1,338
Guess I'm first.
Had to shield the Full Moon from view. Too distracting.
Could see mag 4.3 (mu Cru) with certainty and, off and on, the mag 4.6 star closer to it.
Live in an outer suburban area.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-05-2009, 08:20 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,437
20:15

Had to shield my eyes from the moon too.

Mag 4.7. (Is it iota? - I don't have my glasses)

Rural.

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-05-2009, 09:11 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
9pm
My husband Greg took part as well. We shielded our eyes from the moon, and we both agree that our limiting mag is 5.5.
Though I had to use averted vision and even then the star would pop in and out of view.
We live in a Rural area.

Interesting test, thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-05-2009, 09:18 PM
Rob_K
Registered User

Rob_K is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bright, Vic, Australia
Posts: 2,185
Had a go. Could see mu Cru easily, but I think it might be a bit brighter than the mag 4.3 you've got marked (mag 4.0). In any case, could see delta Cru at mag 4.3, and nearby zeta & eta Cru easily (4.0 & 4.1). Funnily enough, surprised that I could see the Jewel Box - also lambda Cru 4.6, right on the very limit & only popping into view occasionally. Nothing deeper.
So, limiting magnitude 4.6.
Rural setting (I live in a 'suburban' street in a country town say 3000 pop, but am right on the outer edge)

Good luck with it!

Cheers -
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-05-2009, 09:46 PM
ngcles's Avatar
ngcles
The Observologist

ngcles is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Billimari, NSW Central West
Posts: 1,664
Hi Rob,

Just checked outside at 9.30pm 09052009. Sky looks a little hazy, some cumulus too. Suburban Engadine 34km S of Sydney.

Mu (4.0)- yep

Zeta (4.05) - yep

Eta (4.14) - yep

Theta 1 (4.39) -yep (barely)

Iota (4.69) - no.

NELM in the area is therefore about +4.4


Best,

Les D
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-05-2009, 11:07 PM
Robh's Avatar
Robh (Rob)
Registered User

Robh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob_K View Post
Could see mu Cru easily, but I think it might be a bit brighter than the mag 4.3 you've got marked (mag 4.0).
Rob_K, thanks for the correction on mu Cru at 4.0. Also Les.
Have corrected attachment. Hasn't affected any of the readings on earlier posts. Fingers crossed for anyone outside now.
Apologies, Rob
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-05-2009, 11:15 AM
Robh's Avatar
Robh (Rob)
Registered User

Robh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 1,338
Thanks Al, Jeanette/Greg, Rob_K and Les.

Only a small sample but looks like NELM (naked-eye limiting mag)
around 4.5 for outer suburban
up to 5.5 for rural
under a Full Moon.

Appreciate any further input tonight or tomorrow night, especially any observations for inner suburban or inner city. Will update again tomorrow if I get any more data.

Regards, Rob.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-05-2009, 11:37 AM
Barrykgerdes
Registered User

Barrykgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Beaumont Hills NSW
Posts: 2,900
At the Macquarie Uni open night I could not see anything dimmer than mag 2.8. (only three stars of the Crux.). The telescope area was bright enough to read the paper even after some of the floods were turned off.

Through a 10" LX200 the jewell box was there but looked awful flat. Omega Centauri was just visible and The Tarantula the central portion (about two arc minutes) was visible. Luckily most only wanted to see Saturn or the Moon.

Barry
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-05-2009, 06:11 PM
Satchmo's Avatar
Satchmo
Registered User

Satchmo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,883
What was the deal with holding a public star party on the Full Moon ? I've never encountered such a thing. First quarter is a good idea though.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-05-2009, 08:25 PM
Rob_K
Registered User

Rob_K is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bright, Vic, Australia
Posts: 2,185
Had another go tonight, just out of interest. Transparency was better with skies noticeably 'darker', more than could be accounted for by the slight phase change. End result no different, but lambda Cru and the other mag 4.6 star could be held better tonight.

Cheers -
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-05-2009, 08:34 PM
telecasterguru's Avatar
telecasterguru (Frank)
Have scope will travel!

telecasterguru is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Pitnacree NSW
Posts: 1,501
I just went outside and had a bit of a squiz.
Only A, B and Ga were clearly visible at all. D and E became slightly visible after about 10 minutes of adjustment but nothing much else after that.
I live in the Inner city Sydney about 1.5k East of the CBD.

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-05-2009, 08:47 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
tonight kilmore VIC, only e-at 3.6 visible, virtual fullmoon
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-05-2009, 08:51 PM
Robert9's Avatar
Robert9 (Robert)
Registered User

Robert9 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mt. Waverley, VIC, Australia
Posts: 741
epsilon (3.6) visible
mu and xi (4.0) just visible and occasionally a glimpse of theta1 (4.3)
Outer suburbia (15Km East of Melbourne)

Robert

Last edited by Robert9; 11-05-2009 at 09:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-05-2009, 10:01 PM
Barrykgerdes
Registered User

Barrykgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Beaumont Hills NSW
Posts: 2,900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satchmo View Post
What was the deal with holding a public star party on the Full Moon ? I've never encountered such a thing. First quarter is a good idea though.
It is not actually a public viewing night. The telescopes are just an addition to a public astronomy lecture that is held twice a year (autumn and spring) and has more to do with available times at the university. It was just bad luck that this time was full moon, although this is the first time in about 20 years that that we have actually had a full moon. At least we had some clear sky fo a couple of hours. Better than rain or clouds.

Barry
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-05-2009, 02:52 PM
Robh's Avatar
Robh (Rob)
Registered User

Robh is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 1,338
Update for NELM.
Getting some idea of the rough ranges under a Full Moon:
inner city 3-3.5
inner suburban 3.5-4
outer suburban 4-4.5
rural 4.5-5.5

Will continue for another couple of nights as still near Full Moon.
If you would like to participate, grab the map below that now has some instructions.
The more data, the better I can gauge the moons effect on naked-eye limiting magnitude. I have a map ready with stars to mag 7 (Crux map 2) to repeat the test nearer New Moon, 19th to 25th May. Will post in new thread later.

Thanks to all contributors, Rob.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Crux NELM 1.pdf (61.3 KB, 11 views)

Last edited by Robh; 11-05-2009 at 08:42 PM. Reason: Attached new file
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement