Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 09-05-2009, 06:04 PM
starfinder's Avatar
starfinder (Russ)
Registered User

starfinder is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 113
Southern Pinwheel Galaxy - M83

Hi all. An image I'd like to share with you all. Taken under dark skies through my Takahashi FS128 into a self-guided SBIG STL11000M camera. Two hours total exposure in 20min subs (LRGB 60:20:20:20); image is approx 25% of original frame. Processed in CCDStack and finished in Photoshop CS4. Comments always welcome. Russ
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M83_LRGB_small.jpg)
193.7 KB181 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-05-2009, 07:30 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Very nice image Russ but I would like to see a bit more colour saturation on this pretty galaxy.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-05-2009, 07:52 PM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Nice shot Russ - plenty of detail there.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-05-2009, 10:31 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Lovely capture Russ, very nicely detailed and a couple of little bonus galaxies at the bottom by the looks of it.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-05-2009, 01:50 PM
Jen's Avatar
Jen
Moving to Pandora

Jen is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Swan Hill
Posts: 7,102
Beautiful pic Russ
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-05-2009, 08:57 PM
starfinder's Avatar
starfinder (Russ)
Registered User

starfinder is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 113
Many thanks for your comments.

Picking up on Doug's suggestion - I've tried increasing saturation in Photoshop (+25-+35 in Master or Red) without significant increase in colour, just brought out red noise. BTW this is the first galaxy I've imaged using the LRGB method and I've only been doing this type of imaging/processing since the beginning of the year. Sooooooo much to learn, soooooo little time! Any advice from the Forum about how to improve saturation would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance for your help. Russ
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-05-2009, 08:11 PM
spacezebra's Avatar
spacezebra (Petra)
Lost in Namibia

spacezebra is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Albury NSW
Posts: 3,134
Hi Russ

This is a beautiful galaxy. You have captured so much detail.

Cheers Petra d.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-05-2009, 08:34 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Basically a nice shot Russ. A few possible improvements would be to get more colour into the galaxy which has a bluish hue with some red Ha patches and a yellowish core, some colour into the stars and to repair the star elongation from the tracking errors.

Star repair:
1. make a duplicate layer
2. set it to darken mode
3. lasso the galaxy and select invert so everything except the lassoed galaxy is selected.
4. filter/other/offset
5 adjust horizontal and vertical numbers until you get more round stars.
6. You can enter then edit/fade to reduce the effect for fine tuning as the offset filter only takes whole numbers.

Now select the stars and increase the colour saturation. Use the colour range tool to select out the stars only.

Then use colour balance tool to bring up the overall colours of the galaxy or if that is affecting the stars too much then use the sponge tool, set to saturate 5% and rub it on the galaxy only.

A bit of smart sharpening on the galaxy only (lasso it first and feather 25 pixels) - not too much should polish it off.

Cheers,

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-05-2009, 12:13 PM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,696
Hi Russ,

Your stars are elongated. I don't know if this is tracking or misregistration. If it's tracking you may need to take shorter exposures. Misregistration can be fixed in CCDStack by better selection of the reistration stars, DON'T use saturated stars, smaller ones are usually best as the centroid is better defined. Starsnap in CCDstack works best with roughly aligned images, for subs you can turn off the scale function and just use the rotate and shift functions. Sometimes the different colours require a little scaling though, particularly if there's a focus shift.

Cheers
Stuart
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-05-2009, 11:10 PM
starfinder's Avatar
starfinder (Russ)
Registered User

starfinder is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 113
Thanks

Thanks guys for your extremely helpful advice. Exposures were 20mins and were taken before I'd done PEC on the mount. You're right- exposures were too long under the prevailing sub-optimal conditions, but it's good to push the boundaries to see how far we can go. I'm intrigued about elongated star repair. I will give it a try, but nothing beats good data! Thanks again and clear skies. Russ
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement