ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Last Quarter 40%
|
|

01-07-2005, 07:39 PM
|
 |
Planet photographer
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
|
|
nebula filters
Sorry if this has been discussed before in here, but I have very dark skies where I live, just wondering if a nebula filter would be of any benefit to me?
Thanks.
|

01-07-2005, 07:57 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
|
|
Hi John, yes mate It will still make a huge difference on nebs !
Louie
|

01-07-2005, 08:09 PM
|
 |
The 'DRAGON MAN'
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
|
|
Unlike a Moon filter which kills everything except the Moon.
I should know! I accidently leave mine in after Mooning on a regular basis and keep wondering why I can't see anything LOL!!
|

01-07-2005, 08:16 PM
|
Planetary neb & glob nut
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 879
|
|
Hi John,
They make a big difference in the intricate detail you can see, both from the suburbs and from dark sky sites. I would recommend bypassing SkyGlow and broadband nebular filters (i.e. Orion SkyGlow and Lumicon Deep Sky filter) as they are more useful for photography from the burbs and are of limited use for visual astronomy. For general visual use the UHC filters (i.e. Lumicon UHC, Orion Ultrablock, Astronomiks UHC) are the best. For specific uses (i.e. planetary nebula's and supernova remnants) the OIII filters are the best. For a more indepth read see:
http://www.cloudynights.com/item.php...d=63&pr=2x9x42
Hope that helps.
Darren
|

01-07-2005, 08:27 PM
|
 |
Planet photographer
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
|
|
Yes guys, that helps.. Thanks for your quick replys!
|

01-07-2005, 08:30 PM
|
Planetary neb & glob nut
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 879
|
|
Hey John,
If you are thinking of getting UHC or OIII filters, the current recommendation is for Astronomiks filters. Ask John Bambury and he will give you the details
Darren
|

01-07-2005, 08:32 PM
|
 |
The 'DRAGON MAN'
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
|
|
I am going to try those yellow night driving glasses as someone in our society said it brightens some objects. Interesting!
Darren, your location in the upper right of your posts say 'Brisbane'. I thought you moved to Hong Kong.
|

01-07-2005, 09:20 PM
|
 |
Planet photographer
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
|
|
TY Darren.
|

02-07-2005, 12:20 AM
|
Planetary neb & glob nut
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 879
|
|
I think you got me mixed up with someone else  I'm from Malaysia.....
Darren
|

02-07-2005, 12:29 AM
|
 |
Planet photographer
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
|
|
SHoooWeee! Those filters are DEAR! How bout a Baader? their a lot cheaper....?
|

02-07-2005, 12:34 AM
|
 |
The 'DRAGON MAN'
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
|
|
Sorry Darren, I must have.
John, Andrews sells fairly cheap filters but I don't know the quality.
Here is a great site about which filters to use though
http://sciastro.net/portia/advice/filters.htm
Last edited by ballaratdragons; 02-07-2005 at 12:36 AM.
|

02-07-2005, 12:59 AM
|
 |
Planet photographer
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
|
|
AOE seems to be the cheapest by the looks......but they only sell Baader, anyone know of the quality of these?
|

02-07-2005, 12:59 AM
|
 |
A very 'Senior' member.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,571
|
|
Are you looking at the 1 1/4" ?? They're cheap at around $190.00. Oh, if you have 2" E/Pcs.,they're around $500.00 & beyond!!!
If you have dark skies then you'll find the UHC & the OIII best.  L.
ps. Check Astronomik & Lumicon @ Bintel for quality filters.
Last edited by RAJAH235; 02-07-2005 at 01:11 AM.
|

02-07-2005, 01:05 AM
|
 |
Planet photographer
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
|
|
Thanks for the link Ken. Very informative.
L $119 at AOE for the baader 1.25" UHC
|

02-07-2005, 01:18 AM
|
 |
A very 'Senior' member.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,571
|
|
That's a good price for a UHC. What's the quality like? Anyone.  L.
|

02-07-2005, 01:31 AM
|
 |
Planet photographer
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
|
|
I'll have to go in search of some comparison reviews I think. I've been caught out a few times now by purchasing second-rate accessories.
|

02-07-2005, 02:02 AM
|
 |
A very 'Senior' member.
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,571
|
|
Last edited by RAJAH235; 02-07-2005 at 02:15 AM.
|

02-07-2005, 02:21 AM
|
 |
Planet photographer
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
|
|
|

02-07-2005, 09:05 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne Vic
Posts: 290
|
|
John I have a Sirius optics nebulae 1 filter and it works pretty well on my little scope. I was told that this filter is good for planetaries as well as nebulas where as others are only good for nebulas. My scope is dark anyway so it doesn,t do this filter justice. I can still see the difference though. I think through a better scope you would be able to really tell the difference. Ibought it from melbourne for $125 1.25". But I think that Telescope and Astronomy in South Australia sell them cheaper. I got an IR Baader filter for $85 for my webcam. Their website is www.telescope-astronomy.com.au
Regards Cristian
|

02-07-2005, 09:10 AM
|
 |
No GOTO..I enjoy the hunt
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,094
|
|
John
Tonight I hope to test out my new 2" NEB1 filter. It does similar things to a UHC, with subtle differences in the bandpass. I also have a Lumicon 1.25" UHC (a reason I wanted something slightly different). The NEB1 is from Sirius Optics (USA) and I purchased it from Andrews. It is cheaper than other filters as the coatings aren't laminated between two pieces of glass, rather the coatings are exposed on one side of the filter (the side that ends in the eyepiece when the filter is in place). Obviously much more care needs to be taken with these filters, but part of the idea is to improve the view by removing the extra glass.
I will get back to you with how it performed after tonight - fingers crossed
Last edited by astro_south; 02-07-2005 at 09:13 AM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:28 AM.
|
|