Hi Scott & All,
Quote:
Originally Posted by tornado33
The PN is Mag 14.7, so will be a nice visual challenge, but times running out this season. Anyone going to the SPSP may want to pencil it in for the big dobs there.
I love Planetaries, theres so many of them out there that have rarely been imaged in colour, and no 2 are exactly the same.
Scott
|
First up, Excellent image Scott! Love PNe!!
For visual observers, big dob not required, dark sky optional, but somewhat if not highly desirable.
SA 2-21 is visible in a 10" 'scope from suburbia -- it's really only mag 4.4 16 Puppis that makes it tricky to see.
Here is the 25cm observation from suburban Engadine in Jan 1997:
x138 21' TF + UHC filter.
Very difficult to see due to glare from a mag 4 * (16 Puppis) which is only 6' E. Must exclude that star to make even a dolubtful obs. A.V strictly needed. Disc, Nr a couple of mag 12 *s. Amorphus blob, maybe 40-50" diameter. No structure visible. Diffuse edges. V faint for home and 25cm!!
and a couple of nights later at Bargo under a "nearly dark" sky:
x181 15' TF + UHC.
x181 17' TF. Mag 13.5 Size 40". Confirming observation of one made at home on 02011997. Much easier in a DK sky. Can almost hold with D.V. Makes a RA Tri with 2 mag 12 *s. 5' W of mag 4 16 Puppis. Maybe annular, centre seems slightly darker. Edges seem harder than on 02011997.
It bears considerable similarity to M97. Undoubtedly would be a very nice sight in a big 'scope.
As for the other bits of stuff, a SIMBAD search (have I mentioed before how much I hate the SIMBAD interface) reveals nothing at their position. My
guess is that they are very distant galaxies. If you look carefully there are several more in the close crop of your image Scott and in the DSS frame here and there.
Best,
Les D