Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-04-2009, 12:53 AM
chrisc (Chris)
Registered User

chrisc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Canberra
Posts: 39
More of the moon

Not as nice as Geoff's, but I thought I'd toss these up here anyway, as they were taken with the same model camera (little compact digital in an afocal approach), but a much smaller telescope.

Camera: Canon IXUS 70 compact digital (7MP)
Exposure: ISO 400, f 4.9, 1/15th sec.
Scope: 130mm simple Newtonian reflector, f/5
Flimsy end of the spectrum equatorial mount (EQ 2 or 3?)
Motor drive disabled
10mm eyepiece + 2x Barlow + neodymium filter

Seeing sucked, and not that the moon isn't bright enough, but it was within 15 degrees of a sodium streetlight 20 metres away.

I got a little carried away and labelled a few craters... :-)

Cheers,
Chris

P.S: Is there any chance of increasing the allowed image size to something a bit bigger than 200KB?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (AprilMoon1.jpg)
94.4 KB44 views
Click for full-size image (AprilMoon2.jpg)
88.4 KB37 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-04-2009, 06:04 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Nice work Chris, good images.

200kb is generally plenty for most shots, as long as you reduce the resolution before saving for web (which you've done).

Photoshop "Save to Web" or Irfanview or many others let you select the compression so you can avoid artifacts.

If you've really got a hi-res photo, you can just upload it somewhere and link to it.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-04-2009, 11:18 AM
Quark's Avatar
Quark (Trevor)
Registered User

Quark is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Broken Hill NSW Australia
Posts: 4,106
Well done Chris,
It is great to see your enthusiasm, going the extra step with the labeling at least shows that you have taken the time to research your subject, I like it.

Also, with these images, you have demonstrated to others that nice work can be done with basic equipment.

Congratulations
Regards
Trevor
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-04-2009, 04:15 PM
chrisc (Chris)
Registered User

chrisc is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Canberra
Posts: 39
Is there anywhere online with an absolutely definitive list/map of all named features on the near side of the moon, by the way?

I'm not holding out much hope that there's anything I can see that hasn't already been named, I'm just curious. :-)

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-04-2009, 06:09 PM
Quark's Avatar
Quark (Trevor)
Registered User

Quark is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Broken Hill NSW Australia
Posts: 4,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisc View Post
Is there anywhere online with an absolutely definitive list/map of all named features on the near side of the moon, by the way?

I'm not holding out much hope that there's anything I can see that hasn't already been named, I'm just curious. :-)

Chris
Hi Chris,
Not sure about on the net but Antonin Rukl's "Atlas of the Moon" is the best reference that I know of. It is published by Sky Publishing Corp / Cambridge, Massachusetts 2004, ISBN 1-931559-07-4.

I purchased my copy through Australian Sky & Telescope, I think it would be at Bintel also.

Regards
Trevor
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement