Unfortunately I can't edit the title of the thread.
Greg.
hehe.. our little secret Greg
To edit the title, edit and then press the "edit" at the bottom of the post. This will take you back into full edit mode, where you can change the title if you like.
Don't tell anyone about spelling gaffe, I pride myself on my literacy (plus $50 is on its way in the mail hehehe)
Greg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaroo
hehe.. our little secret Greg
To edit the title, edit and then press the "edit" at the bottom of the post. This will take you back into full edit mode, where you can change the title if you like.
Hi Greg,
What a lovely rendition, love the delicate detail you have captured.
As you have mentioned, this region is dominated by the density of the star field but your image is deep enough to really do justice to the very fine filaments of ionized gas that appear close to the central Wolf Rayet star which is the source of excitation.
When I showed your image to my family, they pointed out to me something within the picture.
In this crop, can you see the profile of a Koala facing to the right?
It is a beautiful if faint object. I didn't want to rush it as I knew it was faint. It comes out fairly well in Ha though.
Greg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon
Wow Greg, that 6 plus hours certainly paid off, well done indeed a beautiful image.
Leon
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quark
Hi Greg,
What a lovely rendition, love the delicate detail you have captured.
As you have mentioned, this region is dominated by the density of the star field but your image is deep enough to really do justice to the very fine filaments of ionized gas that appear close to the central Wolf Rayet star which is the source of excitation.
wow what a fantastic image - with so much detail within it and so much of the extents shown around it it looks a little like the running logo from the Beijing Olympics
Greg, have you considered that the image might be a little on the red side? I noted that all the stars appear to be white. I think that there is a red giant in this field. Probably wrong, but just thought I would ask.
