Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-01-2009, 07:59 PM
anthony.tony's Avatar
anthony.tony
Registered User

anthony.tony is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Canowindra NSW Australia
Posts: 1,218
The Rosette Neb Canon 350D

Hello I shot this at 11.20pm. last night.582 secs. at ISO-800.Shot in raw format with 350D .with Badder Coma Corrector.800X200 Reflector.Guided on Eq6 mount, Camera Noise reduction on.Processing in Cs3 raw then in Cs3.Tony
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Moncer.rosette-Ice-in-Space.jpg)
197.5 KB37 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-01-2009, 08:20 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
pretty good for a single sub on an unmodded camera
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-01-2009, 08:25 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
Agreed, for one frame that is very well done indeed.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-01-2009, 09:14 PM
anthony.tony's Avatar
anthony.tony
Registered User

anthony.tony is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Canowindra NSW Australia
Posts: 1,218
Thank You.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-01-2009, 11:41 PM
bluescope's Avatar
bluescope
I've got a Sirius eye !

bluescope is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Country W.A.
Posts: 1,587
Now take about 20 - 30 more frames and stack them and you'll be amazed at what comes out at the other end Tony. By the way I'm not sure what you mean by .582 secs ?

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-01-2009, 11:49 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
I think that was 582 secs, not .582 secs.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-01-2009, 12:12 AM
anthony.tony's Avatar
anthony.tony
Registered User

anthony.tony is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Canowindra NSW Australia
Posts: 1,218
The Time of Exposure was 582 seconds taken from my camera Data. Tony
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-01-2009, 12:42 AM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
I agree, an amazing shot from an unmodded camera and a single exposure.

Baz.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-01-2009, 07:04 AM
anthony.tony's Avatar
anthony.tony
Registered User

anthony.tony is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Canowindra NSW Australia
Posts: 1,218
Shooting in Raw and processing in Camera Raw makes a Big difference.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-01-2009, 05:57 PM
anthony.tony's Avatar
anthony.tony
Registered User

anthony.tony is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Canowindra NSW Australia
Posts: 1,218
I have been Going into curves when Processing and opening the RED Channel and Pulling it up a Bit Trial and Error.,Then Opening the BLUE Channel and Moving it up a bit.This bring a Bit more Ha detail out. Tony
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-01-2009, 06:10 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Good effort Tony.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement