Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-11-2008, 10:53 PM
deadsimple's Avatar
deadsimple (Ash)
Registered User

deadsimple is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 180
Image Processing Train

Hi all,

I was wondering what image processing programs everyone uses for astrophotography, and just as importantly what specific features/algorithms in these programs you invoke for what purpose - from initial frame grab through to final processed image.

For my planetary imaging (I'm still new at this): after capturing with WxAstroCapture, I do the typical BMP export with VirtualDub, fed to RGBsplit, then into ppmcentre, followed by per-channel processing in Registax (stacking, wavelets). Then I used GIMP to combine and offset the channels, sharpen, crop, etc.

While I'm here, I've been looking at adding Astra Image to the list. I was quite impressed with the deconvolution and reliable wavelet processing. Can anyone recommend it? Worth the $60AU for the basic version? What about $200AU for the Pro version?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-11-2008, 12:55 AM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
I paid the $60 AUD for Astra Image, Worth every cent... the difference it can make to an image is fantastic..

I bought the plug in for photoshop.. however Im now kind of wishing I got the stand alone version... as the photoshop plugin will not work with tiff files.. only BMP's, JPG's and PNG's.

I found RGB split to be a rather serious waste of time... others swear by it... I suppose its all up to you, but I wouldn't bother processing each color separatly.. After all, thats the reason you buy a color camera, so you dont have to do crazy stuff like RGB combines, and 3x the processing to achieve a marginally better image...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-11-2008, 01:29 AM
deadsimple's Avatar
deadsimple (Ash)
Registered User

deadsimple is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 180
Quote:
I found RGB split to be a rather serious waste of time... others swear by it...
Well I initially started using it to make it easier for ppmcentre and Registax to align - whether or not it helped in that regard is yet to be determined, but that's not why I continue doing separate-channel processing. I can stack different numbers of frames for different channels, which is a big deal considering my blue channel is usually a complete mess (thread here). Recently I've been using a much lower number of blue stacks, or just stripping out the blue channel completely and making RG images (which turn out fantastic).

Quote:
After all, thats the reason you buy a color camera, so you dont have to do crazy stuff like RGB combines, and 3x the processing to achieve a marginally better image...
Oh I don't mind the time spent processing, but for me it was a budget decision. A cheap colour webcam with IR filter and adapter was much cheaper than a good mono with filter wheel and filters.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
I paid the $60 AUD for Astra Image, Worth every cent... the difference it can make to an image is fantastic..
Great, I'll definitely consider it then. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement