Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-10-2008, 12:17 PM
Tilt's Avatar
Tilt (Michael)
Registered User

Tilt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Emerald, QLD
Posts: 564
Tarantula Nebula | NGC 2070 | 30 Doradus

Hi Guys,

NGC 2070

Vixen NA140 (f5.7)
EQ6
Canon 350D (Unmodded)
Baader UHC-S filter

60 x 1min (ISO800), unguided... Prickly left the guide scope at home Some usual tweaks in PixInsight and CS3. (However I'm not really that good at processing, still learning).

Interestingly, the image is a bit noisy, maybe due to the warmer weather? The ICNR was enabled but it still seems a bit high - Well more than I expected with ISO800 anyway.

Michael
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Tarantula_Nebula_Web.jpg)
193.0 KB99 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-10-2008, 02:02 PM
peeb61's Avatar
peeb61 (Paul)
Always looking up

peeb61 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 730
Still a fine image Michael! Another for the album especially unguided.

Lots of images makes a good overall image, you can see that in yours.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-10-2008, 05:02 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Nice result, Michael. Some good detail there and nice colour (not the usual aqua from an unmodded camera).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-10-2008, 05:25 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
Excellent work Michael.

You have captured a lot of red data for an unmodded DSLR. All my attempts at the Tarantula have been green/aqua with my DSLR.

Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-10-2008, 10:08 PM
Prickly
Registered User

Prickly is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 347
Some of the graininess might be small stars too. The graininess is not uniform across the frame. Was looking at a photo from another site showing hundreds of faint stars across the image. The pattern of the darker regions matched that from our image.

Here is a link to a superb photo from another IIS member Marcus showing just how many stars there are in the region:

http://www.pbase.com/gailmarc/image/78651501

I think the old timers is catching up. Autoguiders work better with a scope to autoguide through. Better to remind myself of that now than at Lostock.



Cheers
David

Last edited by Prickly; 20-10-2008 at 10:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-10-2008, 10:28 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Very sharp and your colors are spot on too. Top shot
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-10-2008, 05:54 PM
Tilt's Avatar
Tilt (Michael)
Registered User

Tilt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Emerald, QLD
Posts: 564
Thanks all, I appreciate the feedback.

Depending on the weather, I'll get David to come around this weekend and we will point the NA140 at NGC 2070 again (with guiding this time).

Maybe I should mod this 350D? worth thinking about anyway...

Michael
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-10-2008, 08:35 PM
winensky's Avatar
winensky
Registered User

winensky is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ballarat Vic
Posts: 268
Really impresive. Great colour from an unmodded camera. have you done any adjustments in the colour processing?. Also nice and sharp without guiding. Great nebular detail for 1 min subs. One to be proud of!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 22-10-2008, 03:00 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
NGC 2070

Vixen NA140 (f5.7)
EQ6
Canon 350D (Unmodded)
Baader UHC-S filter

60 x 1min (ISO800), unguided... Prickly left the guide scope at home Some usual tweaks in PixInsight and CS3. (However I'm not really that good at processing, still learning).

Interestingly, the image is a bit noisy, maybe due to the warmer weather? The ICNR was enabled but it still seems a bit high - Well more than I expected with ISO800 anyway.

Michael[/quote]

Nice shot.

Yes noise is proportional to temperature.

Typical CCDs double noise with every 6 degrees C change or halve every 6 degrees C drop in temp.

I have read that in warmer temps it is more beneficial to use ISO1600. Not sure of the logic now. Perhaps shorter exposure with boosted gain is less noisy than longer with lower boost I imagine.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 22-10-2008, 08:25 PM
Prickly
Registered User

Prickly is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 347
Thats certainly a profound effect of temp. Mind you if we keep having nights like tonight here in Canberra we can forget worrying about noise.

Perhaps the effect of stacking is relatively greater at higher temps ie. outweighs the gains in noise from longer exposures at lower ISO.

Thanks for that bit of info.

Cheers
David
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement