Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 27-09-2008, 01:07 PM
cohiba (Robert)
Registered User

cohiba is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Perth
Posts: 70
Never Seen One Of These Before

Hey Guys check this out it looks awfully complicated
http://www.zerochromat.com/
I guess at over $15,000 it wants to be
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-09-2008, 02:39 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Very interesting design! First time i've seen one like that.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-09-2008, 05:02 PM
bkm2304's Avatar
bkm2304 (Richard Brown)
Heads Up!

bkm2304 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glen William, NSW
Posts: 625
Think that's weird? Have a look at these! I thought it was a Monty Python spoof page at first! The 12.5 inch Newtonian noted for its "simplicity" beggars belief!
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/hanwellob...ry/30_inch.htm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-10-2008, 11:53 PM
Wavytone
Registered User

Wavytone is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Killara, Sydney
Posts: 4,147
Aaah yes, amateur Boffinry at its British best.

It's basically a Dialyte, folded. The Dialyte (dating from the era of uncoated optics) was based on the idea of using a whopping positive singlet first element, as big as one could afford, followed by a second negative element well down the optical path of much smaller aperture (and lower cost) to correct the aberrations of that first element. The Dialyte design was a big compromise when it comes to off-axis astigmatism, field curvature, chromatism and lateral colour. Basically its a very big telephoto camera lens, with only 2 elements.

These guys have folded it and modernised it - coated optics suggests a four element second group should be no problem, and modern glass types suggest a significantly better result should be possible than the early Dialytes I have data for.

The snag is, if you're going to shell out for a multi-element sub-aperture second group you may as well shell out for a really decent ED doublet or better, triplet and folde the path of that; it will wind up about the same size, costing much the same, and outperforming it in all aspects. Finding some fool silly enough to make a 30" triplet shouldn't be too hard, in England, methinks...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement