Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-09-2008, 11:42 PM
norm's Avatar
norm
Registered User

norm is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ashfield NSW
Posts: 778
Spider Vane choice

Hi All,

Can someone advise what are the pros/cons to choosing either a 3, 4 or curved spider vane. (the curved type will most likely be a 180 degree type, not 60 degree).

I don't mind diffraction spikes but then again, I haven't really given them much thought. Are views different or neglible. Does one design give better views to the other, or does it boil down to personal preference ?
I prefer sharp/tack views and splitting doubles/multiples is something I'd like to get into, outside of DSOs and planetary stuff.

From what I have read a 60 degree curved spider vane seems to be the choice, but I don't think its an option.

Outside of what I have read on the net, comments and experience really appreciated.

PS: scope is an SDM 14" f4.8 WIP.

Cheers,

Norm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-09-2008, 03:21 AM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
I'd err on the concervative side and go for either a 4 vane standard spider or curved spider because this will give a more rigid unit.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-09-2008, 07:23 AM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
Q... are curved spiders comercially available, or is it the home made kit.

i suspect you are a visual person, but from experience the diffraction spikes make processing images a pain. (stars go square if you shrink them)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-09-2008, 08:28 AM
gb_astro
Registered User

gb_astro is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 877
Have you read this one?

http://www.telescope-optics.net/spider.htm

gb.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-09-2008, 08:56 AM
norm's Avatar
norm
Registered User

norm is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ashfield NSW
Posts: 778
Quote:
Have you read this one?
Hi GB, yes I have. The scope will be purely visual and the curved spider will most likely be commercially made, eg Protostar.



Cheers,

Norm
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-09-2008, 09:22 AM
Satchmo's Avatar
Satchmo
Registered User

Satchmo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,883
The best design is 3 vane each vane subtending a 60 degree arc. Protostar does make curved spiders but to their own design which may not be optimal, but still better than seeing 4 or six spikes on bright stars and planets.
You might want to check out these guys who make something closer to the correct design :
http://www.1800destiny.com/Merchant2...egory_Code=CVS

Curved spiders can be just as rigid as there is a fair bit of strength in bending it . If you are making one, make the vanes from 2mm steel. Thicker vanes are still not thick enough to lower contrast they just create a little more diffraction, which Is spread evenly over the whole field and not perceptible.

Dick Suiter showed the contrast transfer function ( MTF) of a scope was not significantly effected as long as the vane thckness was kept below 1/128 of the aperture in mm.

Hope this helps.

Last edited by Satchmo; 06-09-2008 at 09:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-09-2008, 08:47 PM
norm's Avatar
norm
Registered User

norm is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ashfield NSW
Posts: 778
Hi Mark,

Thanks for the link. If I went the curved spider, I'd being going the 3 vane type at 60degrees....

Cheers,

Norm
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement