Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 09-12-2004, 07:16 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Comet 2004 Q2 (Machholz)

Hi all,
anybody imaging/observing this latest visitor?
It is easy to see, and the attached image is from last night, from my backyard. Single shot, using a 300mm Nikkor @f4.5, 180 seconds, at ISO1000, Nikon D100.
While not as spectacular (yet anyway) as the two earlier in the year it is still refreshing to see new stuff.
Try it.
Gary
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (machholz-300mm-180s1000.jpg)
83.9 KB169 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2004, 07:25 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Great looking shot Gary! I'm still yet to see the darn thing, let alone image it.. There hasn't been a clear night since I learnt about the comet.

What sort of exposure times do you need to pick up anything? Will a standard tripod shot of 15 or 30 seconds pick anything up?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-12-2004, 07:52 AM
Saturn%5's Avatar
Saturn%5 (Graeme)
Registered User

Saturn%5 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Launceston
Posts: 758
Great shot Gary.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-12-2004, 08:13 AM
mch62's Avatar
mch62 (Mark)
Registered User

mch62 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Glenore Grove Queensland
Posts: 649
Ditto Iceman , still waiting on clear skys up here in sunny Qld
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-12-2004, 08:20 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Hi all,
in the old days (heck I am sounding old now), with film I would be looking at about 5 - 10 minutes at ISO800 etc.
These days the D100, and a "decent" lens (so about f4 or so) I normally hit the skyglow problem at about 5 minutes, so I use about 2 - 3 minutes, and if necessary, stack a few. This was a single 3 minute exposure at ISO1000.
Try it, you can't hurt.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-12-2004, 09:11 AM
Mick's Avatar
Mick (Michael)
Registered User

Mick is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Oz
Posts: 1,098
Very nice Gary, it's a beautiful Comet I've been observing it for a month or so. Good photo opp when it comes close to the Pleiades on and around the 8/01/05.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-12-2004, 10:43 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
THanks Mick,
I didn't know about that, but will certainly give it a decent try.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-12-2004, 12:11 PM
silvinator's Avatar
silvinator
Lady Post-a-holic

silvinator is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canberra, ACT, Australia
Posts: 448
Hi Gary, quick question: was your image tracked? If so, how did you track it?
Thanks in advance
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-12-2004, 01:47 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
lovely pic.
you need an xray lens on your camera ice
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-12-2004, 03:54 PM
rumples riot
Who knows

rumples riot is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackwood South Australia
Posts: 3,051
Fantastic shot Gary, real nice.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 20-12-2004, 08:32 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Hi Salvinator,
tracked? Yes, but only on a nearby star, so not really in as much as the comet is concerned. But with the short exposure like this it doesn't really matter anyway.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20-12-2004, 11:11 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
Here's what the comet looked like on december 16 from a Sydney suburban location-as seen through a small aperture short tube achromat (ETX 70) and a webcam (ATik 1 C)
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (comet macholz-version 3 16 december 2004.jpg)
68.4 KB97 views
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21-12-2004, 01:24 AM
Daring Dave's Avatar
Daring Dave
Back from Nowhere

Daring Dave is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 199
Unguided....using traditional 35m film how long could I image it before field rotation sets in badly ??????

Cheers DD
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 21-12-2004, 02:22 AM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
http://www.allaboutastro.com/Articlepages/fieldrotation.html

Top info here
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 21-12-2004, 06:29 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Well I get star trails after about 15seconds if I use my digital camera on a tripod.. I can take about 3 x15s shots and stack them together before the rotation means they don't stack well.

If you buy a program called ImagesPlus you can accomodate for field rotation (as best as it can) and will still try and stack them. I haven't really tried using it though, as I haven't bought it and the trial version won't let you save.

Plus, it's pretty complex to use right off the bat.

Great shot seeker! Nice job!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement